Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Working Efficiency of Contrasting Genders under Eustress, Distress, Hyper-Stress, and Hypo-Stress


Affiliations
1 Research Scholar, Doctorate of Business Administration (DBA), Department of Business and Management, ABMS Open University of Switzerland, Zurich, Switzerland
2 Business Lecturer, Doctorate of Business Administration (DBA), Business and Management, London Graduate School, London, United Kingdom
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The aim of the study was to investigate the types of stressors affecting the working efficiency of distinctive genders in Pakistan. A total of 281 employees (Males = 140 and Females = 141) working in the IT sector were recruited through stratified (probability) and purposive and convenience (non-probability) sampling techniques. An online matrix based 5-point scale survey was circulated through gatekeepers. The results showed that younger females had higher ‘eustress’; whereas, males had higher ‘distress’ due to less moral and emotional support. Overall, males were more vulnerable to stress as compared to the females. Females effectively used social support in contrast to their counterparts. Personal stressors frequently distressed females; while, organizational stressors distressed males. The behavioural and physiological reactions resulted from hyper-stress among females; whereas, psychological reactions were shown by males under hypo-stress. Job role affected the working efficiency of non-managers more as compared to the managers. Adequate usage of personal resources was reported to be effective for coping with the job-related stress.

Keywords

Contrasting Gender, Distress, Eustress, Hyper-stress, Hypo-Stress, Working Efficiency.

JEL Classification: G14, J82, L02, L10, L19, M0, M10.

Paper Submission Date: December 10, 2018; Paper Sent Back for Revision: October 5, 2019; Paper Acceptance Date: October 15, 2019.

User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

Abstract Views: 225

PDF Views: 0




  • Working Efficiency of Contrasting Genders under Eustress, Distress, Hyper-Stress, and Hypo-Stress

Abstract Views: 225  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Riffat Faizan
Research Scholar, Doctorate of Business Administration (DBA), Department of Business and Management, ABMS Open University of Switzerland, Zurich, Switzerland
Adnan ul Haque
Business Lecturer, Doctorate of Business Administration (DBA), Business and Management, London Graduate School, London, United Kingdom

Abstract


The aim of the study was to investigate the types of stressors affecting the working efficiency of distinctive genders in Pakistan. A total of 281 employees (Males = 140 and Females = 141) working in the IT sector were recruited through stratified (probability) and purposive and convenience (non-probability) sampling techniques. An online matrix based 5-point scale survey was circulated through gatekeepers. The results showed that younger females had higher ‘eustress’; whereas, males had higher ‘distress’ due to less moral and emotional support. Overall, males were more vulnerable to stress as compared to the females. Females effectively used social support in contrast to their counterparts. Personal stressors frequently distressed females; while, organizational stressors distressed males. The behavioural and physiological reactions resulted from hyper-stress among females; whereas, psychological reactions were shown by males under hypo-stress. Job role affected the working efficiency of non-managers more as compared to the managers. Adequate usage of personal resources was reported to be effective for coping with the job-related stress.

Keywords


Contrasting Gender, Distress, Eustress, Hyper-stress, Hypo-Stress, Working Efficiency.

JEL Classification: G14, J82, L02, L10, L19, M0, M10.

Paper Submission Date: December 10, 2018; Paper Sent Back for Revision: October 5, 2019; Paper Acceptance Date: October 15, 2019.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom%2F2019%2Fv12i11%2F148411