Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Variation in Conflict Behaviours at Departments and Levels of Management


Affiliations
1 Associate Professor, School of Management, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar - 751 024, Odisha, India
2 Student, School of Management, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar - 751 024, Odisha, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Conflict within an organization is ubiquitous. Usually, an organization as a whole is taken as the unit of observation in conflict research. However, the task, processes, and relationship as conflict-sources are more likely to be homogeneous within but heterogeneous across functions. We proposed and studied differences of conflict sources, bullying behaviour, emotions and resolution methods, different business functions, and management levels in a stable public sector steel manufacturing organization. The study found the overall level of conflict and bullying behaviour to be low and stress level to be high. Confrontation and negotiation were more used as a conflict-resolution strategy. Age and experience did not have a significant influence on conflict behaviour. However, task, process, and relationship conflicts were significantly different among departments. Significant differences were observed in bullying behaviours and associated emotions. Confrontation was found to be a major conflict resolution strategy that varied across departments. Process conflict varied significantly among different levels of management. The higher level of management experienced greater process conflict. Middle-level managers reported significantly higher withholding of information, unrealistic targets, belittling, criticism, and excessive monitoring. Middle-level managers extensively used confrontation to resolve conflicts.

Keywords

Conflict, Emotions, Bullying Behaviour, Resolution Strategy, Public Sector, Steel.

JEL Classification : J5, J53, L61, M51, M14.

Paper Submission Date : March 15, 2020; Paper Sent Back for Revision : August 28, 2020; Paper Acceptance Date : November 18, 2020.

User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Agervold, M., & Mikkelsen, E. G. (2004). Relationships between bullying, psychosocial work environment and individual stress reactions. Work & Stress, 18(4), 336–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370412331319794

  • Ayoko, O. B., Callan, V. J., & Härtel, C. E. J. (2003). Workplace conflict, bullying, and counterproductive behaviors. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 11(4), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb028976

  • Ayoko, O. B., Callan, V. J., & Härtel, C. E. J. (2008). The influence of team emotional intelligence climate on conflict and team members’ reactions to conflict. Small Group Research, 39(2), 121–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496407304921

  • Baillien, E., & De Witte, H. (2009). Why is organizational change related to workplace bullying ? Role conflict and job insecurity as mediators. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 30(3), 348–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X09336557

  • Baillien, E., Neyens, I., De Witte, H., & De Cuyper, N. (2009). A qualitative study on the development of workplace bullying: Towards a three way model. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 19(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.977

  • Bartlett, J. E., & Bartlett, M. E. (2011). Workplace bullying : An integrative literature review. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 13(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422311410651

  • Bartlett, J. E., Kotrlik, J. E., & Higgins, C. C. (2001). Organizational research : Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19(1), 43–50.

  • Biswas, W., & Chakraborty, D. (2019). Impact of organizational values, compassion, and well-being on industrial disputes: An empirical study. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 12(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2019/v12i1/141427

  • Boddy, C. R. (2014). Corporate psychopaths, conflict, employee affective well-being and counterproductive work behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(1), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1688-0

  • Caputo, A., Marzi, G., Maley, J., & Silic, M. (2019). Ten years of conflict management research 2007–2017: An update on themes, concepts and relationships. International Journal of Conflict Management, 30(1), 87–110. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-06-2018-0078

  • Chan, J. C. Y., Sit, E. N. M., & Lau, W. M. (2014). Conflict management styles, emotional intelligence and implicit theories of personality of nursing students : A cross-sectional study. Nurse Education Today, 34(6), 934–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEDT.2013.10.012

  • Cheung, C. C., & Chuah, K. B. (1999). Conflict management styles in Hong Kong industries. International Journal of Project Management, 17(6), 393–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00059-3

  • Datta, S., & Madhavi, N. B. (2018). The professional dilemma – To wield the stick for once or to yield yet again: A case analysis. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 11(5), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2018/v11i5/123800

  • De Church, L. A., & Marks, M. A. (2001). Maximizing the benefits of task conflict : The role of conflict management. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12(1), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022847

  • De Clercq, D., & Belausteguigoitia, I. (2017). Overcoming the dark side of task conflict : Buffering roles of transformational leadership, tenacity, and passion for work. European Management Journal, 35(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EMJ.2016.06.008

  • Einarsen, S., & Skogstad, A. (1996). Bullying at work : Epidemiological findings in public and private organizations. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594329608414854

  • Farrastama, D. N., Asmony, T., & Hermanto, H. (2019). Effect of emotional intelligence on counter productive work behavior with job stress as an intervening variable : Study on civil servants in Mataram City. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v3n1.248

  • Flink, C. M. (2015). Multidimensional conflict and organizational performance. The American Review of Public Administration, 45(2), 182–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074013490825

  • Ford, D. P., Myrden, S. E., & Kelloway, E. K. (2016). Workplace aggression targets’ vulnerability factor : Job engagement. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 9(2), 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWHM-11-2015-0065

  • González-Navarro, P., Llinares-Insa, L., Zurriaga-Llorens, R., & Lloret-Segura, S. (2017). Development and validation of the work conflict appraisal scale (WCAS). Psicothema, 29(2), 268–274. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.174

  • Hoel, H., & Cooper, C. (2000). Destructive conflict and bullying at work Extracts of study report compiled for Launch of the Civil Service Race Equality Network. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8321/ffcc35416b266ccd84e0da63fb3348bfb5ac.pdf

  • Hopkins, M. M., & Yonker, R. D. (2015). Managing conflict with emotional intelligence : Abilities that make a difference. Journal of Management Development, 34(2), 226–244. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-04 2013-0051

  • Jimmieson, N. L., Tucker, M. K., & Campbell, J. L. (2017). Task conflict leads to relationship conflict when employees are low in trait self-control : Implications for employee strain. Personality and Individual Differences, 113, 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PAID.2017.03.035

  • Kumari, K. T. (2020). Effect of professional attributes on professional – life conflict: Gender as a moderator in the Indian IT industry. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 13(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2020/v13i1/149946

  • Lee, H. O., & Rogan, R. G. (1991). A cross - cultural comparison of organizational conflict management behaviors. International Journal of Conflict Management, 2(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022698

  • Lewis, D. (2004). Bullying at work : The impact of shame among university and college lecturers. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 32(3), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069880410001723521

  • Lu, W., & Wang, J. (2017). The influence of conflict management styles on relationship quality: The moderating effect of the level of task conflict. International Journal of Project Management, 35(8), 1483–1494. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPROMAN.2017.08.012

  • McCormack, D., Casimir, G., Djurkovic, N., & Yang, L. (2006). The concurrent effects of workplace bullying, satisfaction with supervisor, and satisfaction with co - workers on affective commitment among schoolteachers in China. International Journal of Conflict Management, 17(4), 316–331. https://doi.org/10.1108/10444060610749473

  • Mitra, D., & Chatterjee, I. (2016). Interpersonal relationship needs of employees of private and public sector organizations : A FIRO perspective. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 9(7), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2016/v9i7/97783

  • Morton, S. M. B., Bandara, D. K., Robinson, E. M., & Carr, P. E. A. (2012). In the 21st century, what is an acceptable response rate ? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 36(2), 106–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2012.00854.x

  • Nulty, D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys : What can be done? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701293231

  • Randeree, K., & El Faramawy, A. T. (2011). Islamic perspectives on conflict management within project managed environments. International Journal of Project Management, 29(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPROMAN.2010.01.013

  • Rispens, S. (2012). The influence of conflict issue importance on the co-occurrence of task and relationship conflict in teams. Applied Psychology, 61(3), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00473.x

  • Salin, D. (2003). Ways of explaining workplace bullying: A review of enabling, motivating and precipitating structures and processes in the work environment. Human Relations, 56(10), 1213–1232. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267035610003

  • Saunders, P., Huynh, A., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2007). Defining workplace bullying behaviour professional lay definitions of workplace bullying. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 30(4–5), 340–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJLP.2007.06.007

  • Shaukat, R., Yousaf, A., & Sanders, K. (2017). Examining the linkages between relationship conflict, performance and turnover intentions : Role of job burnout as a mediator. International Journal of Conflict Management, 28(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-08-2015-0051

  • Thomas, K. W., Fann Thomas, G., & Schaubhut, N. (2008). Conflict styles of men and women at six organization levels. International Journal of Conflict Management, 19(2), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1108/10444060810856085

  • Van den Brande, W., Baillien, E., De Witte, H., Vander Elst, T., & Godderis, L. (2016). The role of work stressors, coping strategies and coping resources in the process of workplace bullying : A systematic review and development of a comprehensive model. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 29, 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AVB.2016.06.004

  • Weingart, L. R., Behfar, K. J., Bendersky, C., Todorova, G., & Jehn, K. A. (2015). The directness and oppositional intensity of conflict expression. Academy of Management Review, 40(2), 235–262. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0124


Abstract Views: 169

PDF Views: 0




  • Variation in Conflict Behaviours at Departments and Levels of Management

Abstract Views: 169  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Brajaballav Kar
Associate Professor, School of Management, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar - 751 024, Odisha, India
Aishwarya Tripathy
Student, School of Management, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar - 751 024, Odisha, India

Abstract


Conflict within an organization is ubiquitous. Usually, an organization as a whole is taken as the unit of observation in conflict research. However, the task, processes, and relationship as conflict-sources are more likely to be homogeneous within but heterogeneous across functions. We proposed and studied differences of conflict sources, bullying behaviour, emotions and resolution methods, different business functions, and management levels in a stable public sector steel manufacturing organization. The study found the overall level of conflict and bullying behaviour to be low and stress level to be high. Confrontation and negotiation were more used as a conflict-resolution strategy. Age and experience did not have a significant influence on conflict behaviour. However, task, process, and relationship conflicts were significantly different among departments. Significant differences were observed in bullying behaviours and associated emotions. Confrontation was found to be a major conflict resolution strategy that varied across departments. Process conflict varied significantly among different levels of management. The higher level of management experienced greater process conflict. Middle-level managers reported significantly higher withholding of information, unrealistic targets, belittling, criticism, and excessive monitoring. Middle-level managers extensively used confrontation to resolve conflicts.

Keywords


Conflict, Emotions, Bullying Behaviour, Resolution Strategy, Public Sector, Steel.

JEL Classification : J5, J53, L61, M51, M14.

Paper Submission Date : March 15, 2020; Paper Sent Back for Revision : August 28, 2020; Paper Acceptance Date : November 18, 2020.


References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom%2F2021%2Fv14i1%2F157062