Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Critical Factors to Technology Development in Indian Academia : An ISM-MICMAC Approach


Affiliations
1 Research Scholar, Amity Business School, Amity University, Sector - 125, Noida - 201 313, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Professor - Leadership, Entrepreneurship, and IT and Vice-Chancellor, Amity University, Sector - 125, Noida - 201 313, Uttar Pradesh, India
3 Managing Director, Foundation for Innovation and Technology Transfer, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IIT Delhi), Hauz Khas, New Delhi - 110 016, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The significance of research translation and technology transfer in academia is getting increasing attention for the greater public interest. Besides, the successful transfer of knowledge to augment a university’s outreach mission is in a large measure driven by R&D outcomes, more particularly, in terms of developed technologies. It thus becomes worthwhile to analyze the factors that enable technology development in academia. This objective remains a gap in extant literature. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the enabling factors of technology development in the university ecosystem and to examine their interrelationships. An interpretive structural modelling (ISM) technique was applied to identify the interrelationship among factors. Further, MICMAC analysis was applied to identify the driving and dependent enabling factors. Our findings revealed that top management’s leadership and visionary approach ; research mission ; strategy & culture ; adequate research infrastructure ; and intramural funding for research, development, and innovation-related activities are the key driving factors to technology development in academia. This study will be useful for the managers and decision-makers to comprehend the relationship between technology development enablers and framing the institutional policies and strategies.

Keywords

academia, ISM, MICMAC, research translation, technology development, technology transfer, universities

JEL Classification Codes : C65, I23, O32

Paper Submission Date : August 20, 2021 ; Paper sent back for Revision : February 10, 2022 ; Paper Acceptance Date : March 17, 2022 ; Paper Published Online : May 15, 2022

User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Ahmed, A., & Newton, D. J. (2005). Strengthening African universities' strategic role in knowledge and technology development: Policies and practice from Sudan. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 2(1), 66–80. http://doi.org/10.1504/IJLIC.2005.006806

  • Anatan, L. (2018). An institutional perspective of knowledge transfer within university and industry alliance. International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, 11(4), 378–395. http://doi.org/10.1504/IJEPEE.2018.094519

  • Aristodemou, L., Tietze, F., O'Leary, E., & Shaw, M. (2019). A literature review on technology development process (TDP) models. 1–31. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.35692

  • Arumugam, V., & Jain, K. (2012). Technology transfer from higher technical institutions to the industry in India – A case study of IIT Bombay. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17(2), 141–151.

  • Attri, R., Dev, N., & Sharma, V. (2013). Interpretive structural modelling (ISM) approach: An overview. Research Journal of Management Sciences, 2(2), 3 – 8.

  • Bag, S., & Anand, N. (2014). Modeling soft dimensions of FMS and their interrelationship using ISM and MICMAC analysis. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 7(10), 43–54. http://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2014/v7i10/59252

  • Bagchi, K., Mandal, P., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2011). Attitude towards technology development: A cross-cultural study of India and the USA. International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management, 5(1), 3–21. https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/IJISCM.2011.039067

  • Bagga, T. (2017). Accreditation compulsion or inducement: A perception study of various stakeholders. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 10(12), 7–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2017/v10i12/119977

  • Bagga, T., Bansal, S., Kumar, P., & Jain, S. (2016). New wave of accreditation in Indian higher education: Comparison of accreditation bodies for management programmes. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 9(8), 26–40. http://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2016/v9i8/99778

  • Biranvand, A., Seif, M. H., & Cheraghi, Z. (2018). Interpretive structural modeling of barriers to knowledge commercialization. Journal of Studies in Library and Information Science, 10(26), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.22055/SLIS.2019.14850

  • Boh, W. F., De-Haan, U., & Strom, R. (2016). University technology transfer through entrepreneurship: Faculty and students in spinoffs. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(4), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9399-6

  • Borrego, M., & Newswander, L. K. (2010). Definitions of interdisciplinary research: Toward graduate-level interdisciplinary learning outcomes. The Review of Higher Education, 34(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2010.0006

  • Caetano, M., Araujo, C. S., Amaral, D. C., & Guerrini, F. M. (2011). Open innovation and technology development process: The gap on partnership adoption from a case study perspective. Product Management & Development, 9(2), 111–120.

  • Calcagnini, G., & Favaretto, I. (2016). Models of university technology transfer: Analyses and policies. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(4), 655–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9427-6

  • Cáñez, L., Puig, L., Quintero, R., & Garfias, M. (2007). Linking technology acquisition to a Gated NPD process. Research-Technology Management, 50(4), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2007.11657451

  • Chakrabarti, A. K., & Bhaumik, P. K. (2010). Globalisation of technology development: Offshoring of R&D to China, India and Brazil. International Journal of Engineering Management and Economics, 1(1), 68–79. https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/IJEME.2010.0346

  • Choudhury, D. K. (2016). Sustainable research culture for enhancing the quality of deliverables in classroom teaching-learning environment: An in-depth analysis. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 9(9), 27–43. http://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2016/v9i9/101505

  • Cooper, R. G. (2006). Managing technology development projects. Research-Technology Management, 49(6), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2006.11657405

  • Devi Ramachandran, S., Chong, S. - C., & Wong, K. - Y. (2013). Knowledge management practices and enablers in public universities: A gap analysis. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 30(2), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650741311306273

  • Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

  • Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4

  • Garg, A., Shukla, B., & Kendall, G. (2015). Barriers to implementation of IT in educational institutions. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 32(2), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-11-2014-0026

  • Gargate, G., & Jain, K. (2013). Role of IP policy in innovation and entrepreneurship development : Case study of HEI in India. Udyog Pragati, 37(3), 75 – 85.

  • Geiger, R. L., & Sá, C. (2005). Beyond technology transfer: US state policies to harness university research for economic development. Minerva, 43(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-004-6623-1

  • Govindaraju, C. (2010). Commercialization challenges for developing countries: The case of Malaysia. Technology Monitor, Nov-Dec, 25–30. http://www.techmonitor.net/tm/images/d/dd/10nov_dec_sf3.pdf

  • Halcomb, E. J., Gholizadeh, L., DiGiacomo, M., Phillips, J., & Davidson, P. M. (2007). Literature review: Considerations in undertaking focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16(6), 1000–1011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01760.x

  • Hatakenaka, S. (2008). The role of higher education in high tech industry development: What can international experience tell us? In, Proceedings of the 2008 Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.471.3048&rep=rep1&type=pdf

  • Heinzl, J., Kor, A.-L., Orange, G., & Kaufmann, H. R. (2013). Technology transfer model for Austrian higher education institutions. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(5), 607–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9258-7

  • Khan, J., Haleem, A., & Husain, Z. (2017). Barriers to technology transfer: A total interpretative structural model approach. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 31(6), 511–536. https://www.inderscience.com/info/inarticle.php?artid=89075

  • Kumar, A. A., & Shekhar, V. (2017). Invigorating knowledge sharing in higher education: Indian initiatives. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 10(9), 7–15. http://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2017/v10i9/118235

  • Kumar, S., Luthra, S., Haleem, A., Mangla, S. K., & Garg, D. (2015). Identification and evaluation of critical factors to technology transfer using AHP approach. International Strategic Management Review, 3(1–2), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ism.2015.09.001

  • Lee, A. H., Kang, H.-Y., & Chang, C.-C. (2011). An integrated interpretive structural modeling-fuzzy analytic network process-benefits, opportunities, costs and risks models for selecting technologies. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 10(5), 843–771. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622011004592

  • Lee, Y., & Gaertner, R. (1994). Technology transfer from university to industry: A large - scale experiment with technology development and commercialization. Policy Studies Journal, 22(2), 384–399. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1994.tb01476.x

  • Lercher, H. (2016). Big picture innovation model handbook. Technical report. https://cdn.website-editor.net/bed0b45825b547789e02e711c48a09bf/files/uploaded/150828-BIG-Picture-Leitfaden-ENGLISCH.pdf

  • Luthra, S., Garg, D., & Haleem, A. (2015). An analysis of interactions among critical success factors to implement green supply chain management towards sustainability: An Indian perspective. Resources Policy, 46, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2014.12.006

  • Luthra, S., Kumar, V., Kumar, S., & Haleem, A. (2011). Barriers to implement green supply chain management in automobile industry using interpretive structural modeling technique: An Indian perspective. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 4(2), 231–257. http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jiem..v4n2.p231-257

  • Mallari, M. Q., & Santiago, M. (2016). The profile and functions of vice-presidents for administration of state universities and colleges in the Philippines: Basis for policy inputs. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 5(4), 122–137.

  • Marques, H. R., De Oliveira Garcia, M., Scalioni, D. L., & De Souza Bermejo, P. H. (2016). Cooperation for technological development: An analysis in the context of Federal universities of Minas Gerais state. RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação, 13(1), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rai.2016.02.003

  • Nandagopal, M. (2013). Commercializing technologies from universities and research institutes in India: Some insights from the US experience. Current Science Association, 104(2), 183–189. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24089383

  • Necoechea-Mondragón, H., Pineda-Domínguez, D., & Soto-Flores, R. (2013). A conceptual model of technology transfer for public universities in Mexico. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 8(4), 24–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242013000500003

  • Newcomer, K. E., Hatry, H. P., & Wholey, J. S. (2015). Conducting semi-structured interviews. In, Handbook of practical program evaluation (4th ed., pp.492–505). Wiley. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/9781119171386.ch19

  • Panackal, N., & Venkataramani, B. (2021). A study of the enablers of social capital in an organization: A total interpretative structural modelling and MICMAC approach. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management,14(4), 22–38. http://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2021/v14i4/158725

  • Purushotham, H., Sridhar, V., & Sunder, C. S. (2013). Management of technology transfer from Indian publicly funded R&D institutions to industry-modeling of factors impacting successful technology transfer. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 4(4), 422–428. http://ijimt.org/papers/434-CM505.pdf

  • Raj, T., Shankar, R., & Suhaib, M. (2008). An ISM approach for modelling the enablers of flexible manufacturing system: The case for India. International Journal of Production Research, 46(24), 6883–6912. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540701429926

  • Ramjeawon, P. V., & Rowley, J. (2017). Knowledge management in higher education institutions: Enablers and barriers in Mauritius. The Learning Organization, 24(5), 366–377. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-03-2017-0030

  • Rath, S., Nathani, A., Patel, D., Kulkarni, P., & Gota, V. (2014). Status of technology transfer in India – the much needed Magic Remedy. Current Science Association, 106(8), 1058–1060. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24102297

  • Razmerita, L., Kirchner, K., & Nielsen, P. (2016). What factors influence knowledge sharing in organizations? A social dilemma perspective of social media communication. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(6), 1225–1246. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2016-0112

  • Reddy, P. (2011). The evolving role of universities in economic development: The case of university-industry linkages. In, B. Göransson & C. Brundenius (eds), Universities in transition. Insight and innovation in international development. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7509-6_3

  • Saad, M., Guermat, C., & Brodie, L. (2015). National innovation and knowledge performance: The role of higher education teaching and training. Studies in Higher Education, 40(7), 1194–1209. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.881344

  • Saxena, J. P., & Vrat, P. (1990). Impact of indirect relationships in classification of variables — A micmac analysis for energy conservation. Systems Research, 7(4), 245–253. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/sres.3850070404

  • Sheth, B. P., Acharya, S. R., & Sareen, S. B. (2019). Policy implications for the improvement of technology transfer and commercialization process in the Indian context. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 10(1), 214–233. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-09-2017-0043

  • Shouwu, J., Yong, X., & Zheng, L. (2016). Analysis on the factors influencing the international technology transfer based on ISM model. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 8(3), 206–213. http://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v8n3p206

  • Siadat, S. A., Hoveida, R., Abbaszadeh, M., & Moghtadaie, L. (2012). Knowledge creation in universities and some related factors. Journal of Management Development, 31(8), 845–872. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621711211253286

  • Singh, A., Kazi, R., & Divekar, R. (2019). A conceptual model on fee perception and quality of management education using ISM and fuzzy MICMAC analysis. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 12(7), 36–48. http://doi.org/0.17010/pijom/2019/v12i7/145584

  • Sohani, N., & Sohani, N. (2012). Developing interpretive structural model for quality framework in higher education: Indian context. Journal of Engineering, Science & Management Education, 5(2), 495–501. http://nitttrbpl.ac.in/journal/volume5/Neena%20Sohani.pdf

  • Srivastava, P., & Chandra, S. (2012). Technology commercialization: Indian university perspective. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 7(4), 121–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242012000400010

  • Sung, T. K., & Gibson, D. V. (2005). Knowledge and technology transfer grid: Empirical assessment. International Journal of Technology Management, 29(3–4), 216–230. https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/10.1504/IJTM.2005.005997

  • Supapawawisit, B., Chandrachai, A., & Thawesaengskulthai, N. (2018). The critical factors of research and innovation creation in public universities in Thailand. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 11(1–2), 109–117. http://doi.org/10.1504/IJTGM.2018.092486

  • Suresh, M., & Balajee, T. K. (2021). Modelling of factors influencing on informal learning among school teachers: An ISM-MICMAC approach. Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.547

  • Taghizadeh, H., & Shokri, A. (2015). Relationship among the dimensions of knowledge management from the viewpoint of social capital based on interpretive structural modelling (A case study). Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 14(03), 1550024. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649215500240

  • Tidd, J., & Thuriaux - Alemán, B. (2016). Innovation management practices: Cross - sectorial adoption, variation, and effectiveness. R&D Management, 46(S3), 1024–1043. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12199

  • Van Noorden, R. (2015). Interdisciplinary research by the numbers. Nature, 525(7569), 306–307. https://doi.org/10.1038/525306a

  • Van Ta, C., & Zyngier, S. (2018). Knowledge sharing barriers in Vietnamese higher education institutions (HEIS). International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), 14(1), 51–70. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJKM.2018010104

  • Wang, Y., Yuan, C., Zhang, S., & Wang, R. (2021). Moderation in all things : Industry-university-research alliance portfolio configuration and SMEs' innovation performance in China. Journal of Small Business Management, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2020.1867735

  • Wu, W., & Zhou, Y. (2012). The third mission stalled? Universities in China's technological progress. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(6), 812 – 827.

  • Yip, M. W., & Ng, A. H. (2019). Critical success factors of knowledge management implementation in higher learning institutions. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 13(1), 45–65. https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/IJKL.2019.099362


Abstract Views: 292

PDF Views: 0




  • Critical Factors to Technology Development in Indian Academia : An ISM-MICMAC Approach

Abstract Views: 292  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Meenakshi Kanojia
Research Scholar, Amity Business School, Amity University, Sector - 125, Noida - 201 313, Uttar Pradesh, India
Balvinder Shukla
Professor - Leadership, Entrepreneurship, and IT and Vice-Chancellor, Amity University, Sector - 125, Noida - 201 313, Uttar Pradesh, India
Anil Wali
Managing Director, Foundation for Innovation and Technology Transfer, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IIT Delhi), Hauz Khas, New Delhi - 110 016, India

Abstract


The significance of research translation and technology transfer in academia is getting increasing attention for the greater public interest. Besides, the successful transfer of knowledge to augment a university’s outreach mission is in a large measure driven by R&D outcomes, more particularly, in terms of developed technologies. It thus becomes worthwhile to analyze the factors that enable technology development in academia. This objective remains a gap in extant literature. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the enabling factors of technology development in the university ecosystem and to examine their interrelationships. An interpretive structural modelling (ISM) technique was applied to identify the interrelationship among factors. Further, MICMAC analysis was applied to identify the driving and dependent enabling factors. Our findings revealed that top management’s leadership and visionary approach ; research mission ; strategy & culture ; adequate research infrastructure ; and intramural funding for research, development, and innovation-related activities are the key driving factors to technology development in academia. This study will be useful for the managers and decision-makers to comprehend the relationship between technology development enablers and framing the institutional policies and strategies.

Keywords


academia, ISM, MICMAC, research translation, technology development, technology transfer, universities

JEL Classification Codes : C65, I23, O32

Paper Submission Date : August 20, 2021 ; Paper sent back for Revision : February 10, 2022 ; Paper Acceptance Date : March 17, 2022 ; Paper Published Online : May 15, 2022


References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom%2F2022%2Fv15i5%2F169578