Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Board Characteristics and Risk Disclosure Quality by Integrated Reporters : Evidence from Indian Banks


Affiliations
1 Research Scholar, Banasthali Vidyapith, Tonk - 304 022, Rajasthan, India
2 Assistant Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, Tonk - 304 022, Rajasthan, India
3 Deputy Director, FOSTIIMA Business School, New Delhi - 110 077, India
4 Assistant Professor, School of Commerce Management and Research, ITM University, Raipur - 492 001, Chhattisgarh, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This study aimed to analyze the influence of board characteristics on the quality of risk disclosures in integrated annual reports of banks in India. Integrated reports support organizations in controlling risks, identifying opportunities, connecting risks with business policies, developing business models, and contributing to the value creation process. In February 2017, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) recommended the adoption of an integrated reporting (IR) framework by the top 500 companies in India on a voluntary basis from 2017–18. Considering the relevance of integrated reporting and its underlying benefits to various stakeholders, banks have primarily adopted the IR framework and started publishing their annual reports in line with the IR principles. Using content analysis on the sample of 30 banks listed on the National Stock Exchange (NSE) in India, the efficacy of risk disclosures, the outlook orientation (past, present, and future), approaches to risk (positive, neutral, and negative) were investigated, and the influence of attributes of board of directors on the quality of risk disclosure was examined. On examining 4,183 sentences concerning risk disclosures by Indian banks, the results showed a positive relationship between board size, diversity, independence, meetings, and education background in accounting/finance with risk disclosure quality (RDQ). Also, it was found that integrated reporters tended to disclose more risks and suggested ways to mitigate those risks compared to non-adopters.

Keywords

risk disclosure, agency theory, integrated reporting, corporate governance, disclosure quality

JEL Classification Codes : G21, G28, G32, M48

Paper Submission Date : September 15, 2021 ; Paper sent back for Revision : February 18, 2022 ; Paper Acceptance Date : April 28, 2022 ; Paper Published Online : May 15, 2022

User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Abraham, S., & Cox, P. (2007). Analyzing the determinants of narrative risk information in UKFTSE 100 annual reports. The British Accounting Review, 39(3), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2007.06.002

  • Abraham, S., & Shrives, P. J. (2014). Improving the relevance of risk factor disclosure in corporate annual reports. The British Accounting Review, 46(1), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2013.10.002

  • Allegrini, M., & Greco, G. (2013). Corporate boards, audit committees and voluntary disclosure: Evidence from Italian listed companies. Journal of Management & Governance, 17(1),187–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-011-9168-3

  • Al-Maghzom, A., Hussainey, K., & Aly, D. (2016). Corporate governance and risk disclosure: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. Corporate Ownership and Control, 13(2), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i2p14

  • Al-Hadi, A., Al-Yahyaee, K. H., Hussain, S. M., & Taylor, G. (2019). Market risk disclosures and corporate governance structure: Evidence from GCC financial firms. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 73, 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2017.11.008

  • Anderson, D. R., & Anderson, K. E. (2009). Sustainability risk management. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 12(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6296.2009.01152.x

  • Barako, D. G., Hancock, P., & Izan, H. Y. (2006). Factors influencing voluntary corporate disclosure by Kenyan companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(2), 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00491.x

  • Beretta, S., & Bozzolan, S. (2004). A framework for the analysis of firm risk communication. The International Journal of Accounting, 39(3), 265–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2004.06.006

  • Bianco, M., Ciavarella, A., & Signoretti, R. (2011). Women on boards in Italy. Available at SSRN. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1945855

  • Chen, G., Firth, M., Gao, D. N., & Rui, O. M. (2006). Ownership structure, corporate governance, and fraud: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3), 424–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2005.09.002

  • Cole, C. J., & Jones, C. L. (2004). The usefulness of MD&A disclosures in the retail industry. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 19(4), 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X0401900401

  • Cormier, D., Magnan, M., & Van Velthoven, B. (2005). Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies: Economic incentives, public pressures or institutional conditions? European Accounting Review, 14(1), 3–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963818042000339617

  • De Andres, P., Azofra, V., & Lopez, F. (2005). Corporate boards in OECD countries: Size, composition, functioning and effectiveness. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(2), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00418.x

  • De Villiers, C., Naiker, V., & Van Staden, C. J. (2011). The effect of board characteristics on firm environmental performance. Journal of Management, 37(6), 1636–1663. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311411506

  • Donnelly, R., & Mulcahy, M. (2008). Board structure, ownership, and voluntary disclosure in Ireland. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(5), 416–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00692.x

  • Elghaffar, E. S., Abotalib, A. M., & Mohamed Khalil, M. A. (2019). Determining factors that affect risk disclosure level in Egyptian banks. Banks & Bank Systems, 14(1), 159–171. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.14(1).2019.14

  • Elshandidy, T., Fraser, I., & Hussainey, K. (2013). Aggregated, voluntary, and mandatory risk disclosure incentives: Evidence from UK FTSE all-share companies. International Review of Financial Analysis, 30, 320–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2013.07.010

  • Elshandidy, T., & Neri, L. (2015). Corporate governance, risk disclosure practices, and market liquidity: Comparative evidence from the UK and Italy. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(4), 331–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12095

  • Enslin, Z., Bruwer, W., & Viljoen, C. (2015). Enhancing risk-related disclosure in South Africa: A study on guidelines and current practices. Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences, 8(1), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.4102/jef.v8i1.94

  • Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325. http://www.jstor.org/stable/725104

  • Frias-Aceituno, J. V., Rodriguez-Ariza, L., & Garcia-Sanchez, I.M. (2013). The role of the board in the dissemination of integrated corporate social reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(4), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1294

  • Hackston, D., & Milne, M. J. (1996). Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(1), 77–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579610109987

  • Hariharan, B. R., Sailaja, V. N., & Patel, K. (2017). A study of disclosures on risk management of life insurance companies in India. Indian Journal of Finance,11(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2017/v11i1/108959

  • IIRC.(2013).Internationalframework. http://integratedreporting.org/resource/international-ir-framework

  • Jackson, S. E. (1992). Consequences of group composition for the interpersonal dynamics of strategic issue processing. Advances in Strategic Management, 8(3), 345–382.

  • Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. The Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831–880. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04022.x

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

  • Jorion, P. (2002). How informative are value-at-risk disclosures? The Accounting Review, 77(4), 911–931. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.4.911

  • Kajüter, P. (2006). Risk disclosures of listed firms in Germany: A longitudinal study. Paper presented at the 10th Financial Reporting & Business Communication Conference, July, Cardiff Business School.

  • Kakkar, D., & Kamboj, G. (2011). Board structure and corporate performance: A causal analysis of select Indian companies. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 4(11), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2011/v4i11/62647

  • Kravet, T., & Muslu, V. (2013). Textual risk disclosures and investors' risk perceptions. Review of Accounting Studies, 18(4), 1088–1122. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11142-013-9228-9

  • Lajili, K., & Zéghal, D. (2005). A content analysis of risk management disclosure in Canadian annual reports. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 22(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.2005.tb00714.x

  • Lamboglia, R., Paolone, F., & Mancini, D. (2019). Determinants of the implementation of environmental risk indicators: Empirical evidence from the Italian manufacturing context. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1680

  • Linsley, P. M., & Shrives, P. J. (2006). Risk reporting: A study of risk disclosure in the annual reports of UK companies. The British Accounting Review, 38(4), 387–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2006.05.002

  • Linsmeier, T. J., Thornton, D. B., Venkatachalam, M., & Welker, M. (2002). The effect of mandated market risk disclosures on trading volume sensitivity to interest rate, exchange rate, and commodity price movements. The Accounting Review, 77(2), 343–377. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.2.343

  • Manes-Rossi, F., Nicolo, G., & Levy Orelli, R. (2017). Reshaping risk disclosure through integrated reporting: Evidence from Italian early adopters. International Journal of Business and Management, 12(10), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v12n10p11

  • Marshall, A., & Weetman, P. (2007). Modelling transparency in disclosure: The case of foreign exchange risk management. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 34(5–6), 705–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2007.02007.x

  • Matta, R., & Mohapatra, A. K. (2021). Do content elements and capitals of integrated reporting framework require rethinking amid COVID-19? Empirical Economics Letters, 20, (July Special Issue 1), 13–25. http://www.eel.my100megs.com/2021-7-july-si-1-abstract-p2.pdf

  • McNally, M.-A., Cerbone, D., & Maroun, W. (2017). Exploring the challenges of preparing an integrated report. Meditari Accountancy Research, 25(4), 481–504. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-10-2016-0085

  • Milne, M. J., & Adler, R. W. (1999). Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 12(2), 237–256. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579910270138

  • Mohapatra, A. K., & Jha, S. (2018). Bank recapitalization in India: A critique of public policy concerns. FIIB Business Review, 7(1), 10–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2319714518766113

  • Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2010). Women directors' contribution to board decision-making and strategic involvement: The role of equality perception. European Management Review, 7(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1057/emr.2009.27

  • Oliveira, J., Rodrigues, L. L., & Craig, R. (2011). Voluntary risk reporting to enhance institutional and organizational legitimacy: Evidence from Portuguese banks. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 19(3), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/13581981111147892

  • Pavlopoulos, A., Magnis, C., & Iatridis, G. E. (2019). Integrated reporting: An accounting disclosure tool for high quality financial reporting. Research in International Business and Finance, 49, 13–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.02.007

  • Raar, J. (2002). Environmental initiatives: Towards triple bottom line reporting. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 7(3), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280210436781

  • Rajpurohit, P. D., & Rijwani, P. R. (2020). Financial reporting practices and internal corporate governance mechanisms in emerging markets. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 13(8–9), 8–27. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2020/v13i8-9/155230

  • Robinson, G., & Dechant, K. (1997). Building a business case for diversity. Academy of Management Perspectives, 11(3), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.1997.9709231661

  • Sarpal, S. (2015). Antecedents of corporate board independence in simultaneous equation framework: Evidence from India. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management,8(9), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2015/v8i9/77191

  • Singh, A. K., Maurya, S., & Mohapatra, A. (2019). IPO underpricing and predictive power of board related corporate governance mechanisms: A study of Indian IPO market. Theoretical Economics Letters, 9(6), 2002–2018. https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2019.96127

  • Solomon, J. F., Solomon, A., Norton, S. D., & Joseph, N. L. (2011). Private climate change reporting: An emerging discourse of risk and opportunity? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 24(8), 1119–1148. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571111184788

  • Steyn, M. (2014). Organisational benefits and implementation challenges of mandatory integrated reporting: Perspectives of senior executives at South African listed companies. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 5(4), 476503. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-11-2013-0052

  • Tonk, M. S. (2012). Independent directors: An Indian perspective. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 5(4), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2012/v5i4/60328

  • Vafeas, N. (1999). Board meeting frequency and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(1), 113–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00018-5

  • Van Zijl, W., Wöstmann, C., & Maroun, W. (2017). Strategy disclosures by listed financial services companies: Signalling theory, legitimacy theory and South African integrated reporting practices. South African Journal of Business Management, 48(3), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v48i3.37

  • Vitolla, F., Raimo, N., & Rubino, M. (2020). Board characteristics and integrated reporting quality: An agency theory perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2),1152–1163. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1879

  • Watson, A., Shrives, P., & Marston, C. (2002). Voluntary disclosure of accounting ratios in the UK. The British Accounting Review, 34(4), 289–313. https://doi.org/10.1006/bare.2002.0213

  • Welford, R. (2000). Corporate environmental management 3: Towards sustainable development (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315825106

  • Williams, K. Y., & O'Reilly III, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In, B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (eds.), Research in organizational behaviour (Vol. 20, pp. 77–140). JAI Wilson.

  • Wong, A. (2014). Corporate sustainability through non-financial risk management. Corporate Governance, 14(4), 575–586. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-02-2013-0026


Abstract Views: 221

PDF Views: 0




  • Board Characteristics and Risk Disclosure Quality by Integrated Reporters : Evidence from Indian Banks

Abstract Views: 221  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Rahul Matta
Research Scholar, Banasthali Vidyapith, Tonk - 304 022, Rajasthan, India
Khyati Kochhar
Assistant Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, Tonk - 304 022, Rajasthan, India
Amiya Kumar Mohapatra
Deputy Director, FOSTIIMA Business School, New Delhi - 110 077, India
Debasis Mohanty
Assistant Professor, School of Commerce Management and Research, ITM University, Raipur - 492 001, Chhattisgarh, India

Abstract


This study aimed to analyze the influence of board characteristics on the quality of risk disclosures in integrated annual reports of banks in India. Integrated reports support organizations in controlling risks, identifying opportunities, connecting risks with business policies, developing business models, and contributing to the value creation process. In February 2017, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) recommended the adoption of an integrated reporting (IR) framework by the top 500 companies in India on a voluntary basis from 2017–18. Considering the relevance of integrated reporting and its underlying benefits to various stakeholders, banks have primarily adopted the IR framework and started publishing their annual reports in line with the IR principles. Using content analysis on the sample of 30 banks listed on the National Stock Exchange (NSE) in India, the efficacy of risk disclosures, the outlook orientation (past, present, and future), approaches to risk (positive, neutral, and negative) were investigated, and the influence of attributes of board of directors on the quality of risk disclosure was examined. On examining 4,183 sentences concerning risk disclosures by Indian banks, the results showed a positive relationship between board size, diversity, independence, meetings, and education background in accounting/finance with risk disclosure quality (RDQ). Also, it was found that integrated reporters tended to disclose more risks and suggested ways to mitigate those risks compared to non-adopters.

Keywords


risk disclosure, agency theory, integrated reporting, corporate governance, disclosure quality

JEL Classification Codes : G21, G28, G32, M48

Paper Submission Date : September 15, 2021 ; Paper sent back for Revision : February 18, 2022 ; Paper Acceptance Date : April 28, 2022 ; Paper Published Online : May 15, 2022


References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom%2F2022%2Fv15i5%2F169579