Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Technical Resilience in Intrapreneurs for Product Innovations : An Exploratory Study


Affiliations
1 Amity Business School, Amity University, Sector - 125, Noida - 201313, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Amity Centre for Entrepreneurship Development, Amity University, Noida - 201 313, Uttar Pradesh, India
3 Indian Institute of Management Tiruchirappalli, Tiruchirappalli - 620 024, Tamil Nadu, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Technical resilience in intrapreneurs was accepting realities and taking responsible actions through leading change. This research paper actualized an exploratory analysis of technical resilience leadership of intrapreneurs working in hi-tech product innovation companies. It deliberated on technical resilience leadership patterns of technical engineers and their socio-conscious progressive behavior in a technically competitive world. The paper conducted a descriptive, compared means, and exploratory analysis of the technical resilience leadership of 240 intrapreneurs and their product innovations with a statistical tool (SPSS). It examined intrapreneurs’ visionary thinking, opportunity-seeking, capability-building, and environment-conscious behavior for creating novel product innovations. It evaluated the different scenario plans and featured the innovative work behaviors of intrapreneurs through novel product innovations. Scenarios significantly built high-risk-taking capabilities to address future uncertainties/complexities and improve social well-being. The exploratory analysis explored the core determinants of technical resilience leadership and their effect on assessing the usefulness of scenario plans for novel productions. The paper expressed the importance of scenario planning for change-making and building something new for societal value. The article meaningfully called the attention of audience readers, practitioners, scenario definers, policy formulators, academicians, and technopreneurs (intrapreneurs) on sense-making and differential approaches to scenario planning and idea building for fruitful, innovative production outcomes via technical resilience leadership. The paper proposed the various aspects of technical resilience leadership in intrapreneurs that concurrently led them to high scenario planning efforts for innovative project ideas with a keenness for resilient, differential action behavior.

Keywords

Technical Resilience Leadership (Intrapreneurship), Scenario Planning, Exploratory Analysis, Product Innovations (Applications).

JEL Classification Codes : D81, O15, O32, O33

Paper Submission Date : April 25, 2022 ; Paper sent back for Revision : June 15, 2022 ; Paper Acceptance Date : August 18, 2022 ; Paper Published Online : October 15, 2022

User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Afsar, B., Badir, Y. F., & Bin Saeed, B. (2014). Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(8), 1270–1300. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-05-2014-0152

  • Aggarwal, V. (2019). A conceptual study on factors of entrepreneurial potentiality and their impact on entrepreneurial intention with the moderating role of entrepreneurship education. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 12(6), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2019/v12i6/144932

  • Alekseev, M. A., Freidina, E. V., & Tropin, A. A. (2019). On overcoming strategic uncertainty through the integration of robust control and scenario planning. Economics and Management, 9, 97–106. https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2019-9-97-106

  • Amer, M., Daim, T. U., & Jetter, A. (2013). A review of scenario planning. Futures, 46, 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2012.10.003

  • Appleyard, M. M., Enders, A. H., & Velazquez, H. (2020). Regaining R&D leadership: The role of design thinking and creative forbearance. California Management Review, 62(2), 12–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619897395

  • Arenas, J. J., Gómez, J. E., Ortiz, E., Paz, F., & Parra, C. (2020). Elements of the persistence in innovation: Systematic literature review. Administrative Sciences, 10(4), 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10040083

  • Battistelli, A., Odoardi, C., Vandenberghe, C., Di Napoli, G., & Piccione, L. (2019). Information sharing and innovative work behavior: The role of work‐based learning, challenging tasks, and organizational commitment. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 30(3), 361–381. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21344

  • Birasnav, M., Chaudhary, R., & Scillitoe, J. (2019). Integration of social capital and organizational learning theories to improve operational performance. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 20, 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-019-00206-9

  • Bodwell, W., & Chermack, T. J. (2010). Organizational ambidexterity: Integrating deliberate and emergent strategy with scenario planning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.07.004

  • Bouhalleb, A., & Smida, A. (2020). Exploring the relationship between scenario planning and strategic flexibility and complexity. European Journal of International Management, 14(3), 476–493. https://doi.org/10.1504/ejim.2020.107033

  • Brenk, S., Lüttgens, D., Diener, K., & Piller, F. (2019). Learning from failures in business model innovation: Solving decision-making logic conflicts through intrapreneurial effectuation. Journal of Business Economics, 89, 1097–1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-019-00954-1

  • Burt, G., & Nair, A. K. (2020). Rigidities of imagination in scenario planning: Strategic foresight through 'Unlearning.' Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, 119927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119927

  • Chen, L., Gong, Y., Song, Y., & Wang, M. (2021). From creative environment to administrative innovation: Creation and implementation in top management teams. Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(3), 604–621. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.475

  • Derbyshire, J. (2017). Potential surprise theory as a theoretical foundation for scenario planning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 124, 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.05.008

  • Do, H., Budhwar, P., Shipton, H., Nguyen, H.-D., & Nguyen, B. (2022). Building organizational resilience, innovation through resource-based management initiatives, organizational learning, and environmental dynamism. Journal of Business Research, 141, 808–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.090

  • Duus, H. J. (2016). Strategic scenario construction made easy. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 11(1–3), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJFIP.2016.078349

  • Farrukh, M., Meng, F., & Raza, A. (2022). Believe they can succeed, and they will: Intrapreneurial behavior and leadership. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(3), 661–679. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2020-0393

  • Fiorineschi, L., Frillici, F. S., Gregori, G., & Rotini, F. (2019). Stimulating idea generation for new product applications. International Journal of Innovation Science, 10(4), 454–474. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-09-2017-0099

  • Fontana, R., & Vezzulli, A. (2016). Technological leadership and persistence in product innovation in the Local Area Network industry 1990–1999. Research Policy, 45(8), 1604–1619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.002

  • Gandhi, S. J., Robb, C. C., & Lee, A. (2021). The entrepreneurial intrapreneur: A managerial approach to building entrepreneurial competencies. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 25(2–3), 211–232. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2021.115049

  • Gaur, S. P. (2016). Kindling the creative potential. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 20(4), 290–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262916668712

  • Glynn, M. A., Kazanjian, R., & Drazin, R. (2010). Fostering innovation in complex product development settings : The role of team member identity and interteam interdependence. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(7), 1082–1095. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00772.x

  • Gupta, A. K., & Gupta, N. (2019). Innovation and culture as a dynamic capability for firm performance: A study from emerging markets. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 20, 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-019-00218-5

  • Hahn, H. A. (2021). Why systems engineers may have an edge when it comes to personal resilience. INCOSE International Symposium, 31(1), 664–684. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2021.00861.x

  • Hoever, I. J., Van Knippenberg, D., Van Ginkel, W. P., & Barkema, H. G. (2012). Fostering team creativity: Perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity's potential. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 982–996. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029159

  • Huang, L.-Y., Yang Lin, S.-M., & Hsieh, Y.-J. (2021). Cultivation of intrapreneurship: A framework and challenges. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 731990. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.731990

  • Hussein, H. W., & Hafedh, A. A. (2020). Reflection of strategic behaviors in scenario planning. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 10(4), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.37648/ijrssh.v10i04.013

  • Jena, L. K., Bhattacharyya, P., & Pradhan, S. (2019). Am I empowered through meaningful work? The moderating role of perceived flexibility in connecting meaningful work and psychological empowerment. IIMB Management Review, 31(3), 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2019.03.010

  • Jnaneswar, K. (2019). Can work engagement and job satisfaction predict employee innovation? Case of Indian telecom employees. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 12(10), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2019/v12i10/147813

  • Klimczak, K. M., Machowiak, W., Shachmurove, Y., & Staniec, I. (2020). Perceived collaborative risk in small and medium technology enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2020.1799305

  • Kör, B., Wakkee, I., & van der Sijde, P. (2021). How to promote managers' innovative behavior at work: Individual factors and perceptions. Technovation, 99, Article 102127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102127

  • Kulshrestha, V., & Jain, K. (2018). Technology integration in the mobile communication industry: A review. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 11(4), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2018/v11i4/122824

  • Le Bas, C., Mothe, C., & Nguyen-Thi, T. U. (2015). The differentiated impacts of organizational innovation practices on technological innovation persistence. European Journal of Innovation Management, 18(1), 110–127. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2012-0085

  • Madrigano, J., Chandra, A., Costigan, T., & Acosta, J. D. (2017). Beyond disaster preparedness: Building a resilience-oriented workforce for the future. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(12), 1563. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121563

  • Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014). Sense-making in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 57–125. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.873177

  • Margolis, J. A., & Ziegert, J. C. (2016). Vertical flow of collectivistic leadership: An examination of the cascade of visionary leadership across levels. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(2), 334–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.01.005

  • Montgomery, T. (2017). What critical factors do companies consider when selecting innovation ideas? Muma Business Review, 1, 069–080. https://doi.org/10.28945/3843

  • Mura, M., Lettieri, E., Radaelli, G., & Spiller, N. (2013). Promoting professionals' innovative behavior through knowledge sharing: The moderating role of social capital. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(4), 527–544. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2013-0105

  • Mutsuddi, I., & Sinha, R. (2021). Role of leadership skills for developing digital acumen in information technology employees. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 26(2), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262920985955

  • Nandana Prabhu, K. P., Rodrigues, L. L., & Pai, Y. (2019). Transformational leadership and workplace spirituality: A structural model of team effectiveness. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 12(4), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2019/v12i4/143344

  • Obschonka, M., Silbereisen, R. K., & Schmitt-Rodermund, E. (2010). Entrepreneurial intention as developmental outcome. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.02.008

  • Pastuszak, Z., Shyu, S. H.-P., Lee, T.-R., Anussornnitisarn, P., & Kaewchur, O. (2012). Establishing interrelationships among organisational learning, innovation and performance. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 11(2), 200–215. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2012.045176

  • Prabhu, N., & Koodamara, N. K. (2022). Exploring shared leadership: Mediating roles of spirit at work and team trust. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 15(2), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2022/v15i2/168333

  • Pradhan, S., & Pradhan, R. K. (2015). An empirical investigation of relationship among transformational leadership, affective organizational commitment and contextual performance. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 19(3), 227–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262915597089

  • Pradhan, S., Jena, L. K., & Bhattacharyya, P. (2018). Transformational leadership and contextual performance: Role of integrity among Indian IT professionals. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(2), 445–462. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-08-2016-0186

  • Pradhan, S., & Jena, L. K. (2019). Does meaningful work explains the relationship between transformational leadership and innovative work behavior? Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, 44(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090919832434

  • Rivera, M. J. (2017). Leveraging innovation and intrapreneurship as a source for organizational growth. International Journal of Innovation Science, 9(2), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-12-2016-0057

  • Schemmann, B., Herrmann, A. M., Chappin, M. M., & Heimeriks, G. J. (2016). Crowdsourcing ideas: Involving ordinary users in the ideation phase of new product development. Research Policy, 45(6), 1145–1154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.02.003

  • Schumacher, T. R. (2012). Constructing vision with scenario planning. In, 2012 Proceedings of PICMET '12: Technology Management for Emerging Technologies, pp. 122-132.

  • Stam, D., Lord, R. G., van Knippenberg, D., & Wisse, B. (2014). An image of who we might become: Vision communication, possible selves, and vision pursuit. Organization Science, 25(4), 1172–1194. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0891

  • Steele, L. M., Johnson, G., & Medeiros, K. E. (2018). Looking beyond the generation of creative ideas: Confidence in evaluating ideas predicts creative outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences, 125, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.028

  • Stock, R. M., & Schnarr, N. L. (2016). Exploring the product innovation outcomes of corporate culture and executive leadership. International Journal of Innovation Management, 20(1), 1650009. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919616500092

  • Tripathi, A., Bagga, T., & Aggarwal, R. K. (2020). Strategic impact of business intelligence: A review of literature. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 13(3), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2020/v13i3/151175

  • Verma, A., & Singh, P. (2020). Elucidating the effect of learning ability on employees' potential: A study of IT sector in India. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 13(2), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2020/v13i2/150561

  • Zhao, A., Sun, Z., Guan, H., & Jia, J. (2020). Research on the evolution of innovation behavior of new generation entrepreneurs in different scenarios. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 26(5), 1098–1124. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2020.12373

  • Zinn, J. O. (2019). The meaning of risk-taking – key concepts and dimensions. Journal of Risk Research, 22(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2017.1351465


Abstract Views: 249

PDF Views: 0




  • Technical Resilience in Intrapreneurs for Product Innovations : An Exploratory Study

Abstract Views: 249  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Anuja Sehgal
Amity Business School, Amity University, Sector - 125, Noida - 201313, Uttar Pradesh, India
Neelam Saxena
Amity Centre for Entrepreneurship Development, Amity University, Noida - 201 313, Uttar Pradesh, India
Sajeet Pradhan
Indian Institute of Management Tiruchirappalli, Tiruchirappalli - 620 024, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract


Technical resilience in intrapreneurs was accepting realities and taking responsible actions through leading change. This research paper actualized an exploratory analysis of technical resilience leadership of intrapreneurs working in hi-tech product innovation companies. It deliberated on technical resilience leadership patterns of technical engineers and their socio-conscious progressive behavior in a technically competitive world. The paper conducted a descriptive, compared means, and exploratory analysis of the technical resilience leadership of 240 intrapreneurs and their product innovations with a statistical tool (SPSS). It examined intrapreneurs’ visionary thinking, opportunity-seeking, capability-building, and environment-conscious behavior for creating novel product innovations. It evaluated the different scenario plans and featured the innovative work behaviors of intrapreneurs through novel product innovations. Scenarios significantly built high-risk-taking capabilities to address future uncertainties/complexities and improve social well-being. The exploratory analysis explored the core determinants of technical resilience leadership and their effect on assessing the usefulness of scenario plans for novel productions. The paper expressed the importance of scenario planning for change-making and building something new for societal value. The article meaningfully called the attention of audience readers, practitioners, scenario definers, policy formulators, academicians, and technopreneurs (intrapreneurs) on sense-making and differential approaches to scenario planning and idea building for fruitful, innovative production outcomes via technical resilience leadership. The paper proposed the various aspects of technical resilience leadership in intrapreneurs that concurrently led them to high scenario planning efforts for innovative project ideas with a keenness for resilient, differential action behavior.

Keywords


Technical Resilience Leadership (Intrapreneurship), Scenario Planning, Exploratory Analysis, Product Innovations (Applications).

JEL Classification Codes : D81, O15, O32, O33

Paper Submission Date : April 25, 2022 ; Paper sent back for Revision : June 15, 2022 ; Paper Acceptance Date : August 18, 2022 ; Paper Published Online : October 15, 2022


References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom%2F2022%2Fv15i10%2F172407