Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Idiosyncratic Behavior of Shareholders Toward Corporate Sustainability Reports
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Purpose : The present study focused on identifying the factors influencing shareholders’ perception toward corporate sustainability reports. The growing importance of climate-sensitive activities in response to global warming induced us to find out the importance of sustainability reports in the minds of shareholders. Methodology : Seven independent latent variables, namely message characteristics, manager characteristics, assurance and accountability, standards and ratings, intra-firm factors, corporate governance mechanisms, and challenges and risks, were undertaken in the study. Further, the perception of the shareholders measured along the parameter of importance was taken as the dependent variable. For the study, we floated a structured questionnaire, received 412 responses, and ran the analysis on SMART PLS. Findings : We found that only four variables out of seven significantly influenced the perception of the shareholders toward corporate sustainability reports. To elaborate, message characteristics, assurance and accountability, and corporate governance mechanisms positively influenced the perception of the shareholders, while standards and ratings negatively influenced the perception of the shareholders. Practical Implications : It was recommended that corporations must publish credible, accurate, and adequate information while inviting active participation from the shareholders. Our study is not free from limitations and allows scope for future researchers – whether differences in the perception of the shareholders arising due to various boundaries could be undertaken in future research work. Originality : Unlike prior research on corporate social responsibility, the current work builds a model to examine shareholders’ perceptions toward corporate sustainability reports..
Keywords
Corporate Sustainability, Perception of Shareholders, Corporate Governance, Assurance, and Accountability
JELClassification Codes : G24, G34, G38, G41
Paper Submission Date :September 5, 2022 ; Paper sent back for Revision : January 5, 2023 ; Paper Acceptance Date : January 10, 2023 ; Paper Published Online : February 15, 2023
User
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
Font Size
Information
- Adrian C.& Wright, S. (2020). Perception of shareholders and directors on corporate governance: What we learn about director primacy.Accounting and Finance,60(S1),1209–1236. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12418
- Aras G. & Crowther, D. (2009). Corporate sustainability reporting: A study in disingenuity? Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 279 – 288. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40294968
- Ballou B. Heitger D. L. & Landes C.E.(2006).The future of corporate sustainability reporting: Arapidly growing assurance opportunity. Journal of Accountancy, 200(6), 65 – 74.
- Behal V. & Gupta M. (2022). Reporting of corporate social responsibility practices: An evidence from Indian BSE-listed companies. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 15(3), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2022/v15i3/165633
- Byrne B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.
- Christensen H. B. Hail L. & Leuz,C. (2021). Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review. Review of Accounting Studies, 26, 1176 – 1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-021- 09609-5
- Clarkson P. M. Li Y. Richardson G. D. & Vasvari F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4 – 5), 303 – 327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.003
- Cullinan, C., Mahoney, L. S., & Roush, P. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and shareholder support for corporate governance changes. Social Responsibility Journal, 12(4), 687–705. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-10-2015-0161
- Epstein M. J.& Freedman M. (1994). Social disclosure and the individual investor. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 7(4), 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579410069867
- Fakhari H. Malekian E. & Jafaei Rahni M. (2018). Explaining and ranking of the components and indicators of environmental, social and corporate governance reporting by analytic hierarchy process in the companies listed in stock exchange. Iranian Journal of Value and Behavioral Accounting, 2(4), 153–187. https://doi.org/10.29252/aapc.2.4.153
- Fifka M. & Drabble M. (2012). Focus and standardization of sustainability reporting – A comparative study of the United Kingdom and Finland. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(7), 455–474. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1730
- Gillan S. & Starks L. (2000). Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: The role of institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics, 57(2), 275–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304- 405X(00)00058-1
Abstract Views: 181
PDF Views: 0