![Open Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextgreen.png)
![Restricted Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextred.png)
![Open Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextgreen.png)
![Open Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltext_open_medium.gif)
![Restricted Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextred.png)
![Restricted Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltext_restricted_medium.gif)
On a Conductor Formula of Bushnell, Henniart and Kutzko
Subscribe/Renew Journal
The explicit conductor formula of Bushnell, Henniart and Kutzko [BHK98] computes the conductor of a pair of supercuspidal representations of general linear groups over a non-archimedean local field in terms of inducing data for these representations. There are essentially two cases to consider, depending on whether a supercuspidal type admits a split cover or not. The strategy in [BHK98] is to deal with the split case first and to reduce the non-split case to the split case. In this paper, we give a direct proof of the non-split (self-dual) case of the conductor formula.
User
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
Font Size
Information
![](https://i-scholar.in/public/site/images/abstractview.png)
Abstract Views: 196
![](https://i-scholar.in/public/site/images/pdfview.png)
PDF Views: 0