South Asian Journal of Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Impact of Business Group Size and Diversification on Dividend Policy and Payouts:Evidence from Indian Companies


Affiliations
1 School of Management, Presidency University, Bengaluru 560064, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur 721306, West Bengal, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This paper investigates how the decision of likelihood of dividend payments and the dividend payout level decision vary within business-group-affiliated firms by utilizing 781 sample firms listed on National Stock Exchange (NSE) during 1995-2015. This study is different from previous studies as it examines the impact of business-group size and diversification on dividend policy and payouts considering exhaustive list of explanatory variables taken from major theories of dividend policy during post-liberalization and second-generation reform period in India. The comparative analysis results indicate that the dividend payout ratio increases with the increase in the level of groups’ size and diversification during the entire study period as well as during the post-liberalization and the second-generation reform period. The econometric results indicate that the larger and diversified business-group-affiliated firms are lesser sensitive to investment opportunities, financial leverage, the firm’s maturity, and profitability as compared with the standalone and the other business-group-affiliated firms.

Keywords

Dividends, Dividend policy, Diversified business-groups, Emerging financial markets, Internal capital markets.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Aharony, J., & Swary, I. (1980). Quarterly dividend and earnings announcements and stockholders’ returns: An empirical analysis. The Journal of Finance, 35(1), 1-12.

  • Ang, J. S. (1987). Do Dividends Matter?: A Review of Corporate Dividend Theories and Evidence (1st ed.). New York: NYU Stern School of Business.

  • Asquith, P., & Mullins, D. W. (1983). The impact of initiating dividend payments on shareholders’ wealth. Journal of Business, 56(1), 77-96.

  • Bhattacharya, S. (1979). Imperfect information, dividend policy, and ‘the bird in the hand’ fallacy. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 259-270.

  • Buysschaert, A., Deloof, M., Jegers, M., & Rommens, A. (2008). Is group affiliation profitable in developed countries? Belgian evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(6), 504-518.

  • Bulan, L. T., & Subramanian, N. (2009). The firm life cycle theory of dividends. In H. K. Baker (Ed). Dividends and Dividend Policy (pp. 201-213). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Caves, R. E., Porter, M. E., Spence, A. M., & Scott. J. T. (1980). Competition in the Open Economy: A model Applied to Canada (1st ed.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Claessens, S., Fan, J. P., & Lang, L. H. (2006). The benefits and costs of group affiliation: Evidence from East Asia. Emerging Markets Review, 7(1), 1-26.

  • DeAngelo, H., DeAngelo, L., & Stulz, R. M. (2006). Dividend policy and the earned/contributed capital mix: a test of the life-cycle theory. Journal of Financial Economics, 81(2), 227-254.

  • Denis, D. J., & Osobov, I. (2008). Why do firms pay dividends? International evidence on the determinants of dividend policy. Journal of Financial Economics, 89(1), 62-82.

  • Dewenter, K., Novaes, W., & Pettway, R. H. (2001). Visibility versus complexity in business groups: Evidence from Japanese keiretsu. The Journal of Business, 74(1), 79-100.

  • Easterbrook, F. H. (1984). Two agency-cost explanations of dividends. The American Economic Review, 74(4), 650-659.

  • Frankfurter, G., Wood, B. G., & Wansley, J. (2003). Dividend Policy: Theory and Practice (1st ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.

  • George, R., & Kabir, R. (2012). Heterogeneity in business groups and the corporate diversification–firm performance relationship. Journal of Business Research, 65(3), 412-420.

  • Grullon, G., Michaely, R., & Swaminathan, B. (2002). Are Dividend Changes a Sign of Firm Maturity?*. The Journal of Business, 75(3), 387-424.

  • Higgins, R. C. (1972). The corporate dividend-saving decision. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 7(2), 1527-1541.

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.

  • Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (2000a). Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups. The Journal of Finance, 55(2), 867-891.

  • Khanna, T., & Rivkin, J. W. (2001). Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets. Strategic Management Journal, 22(1), 45-74.

  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.

  • Labhane, N. B., & Mahakud, J. (2018). Dividend Smoothing and Business groups: Evidence from Indian companies. Global Business Review, 19(3), 690-706.

  • Labhane, N. B. (2019). Dividend Policy Decisions in India: Standalone Versus Business Group-Affiliated Firms. Global Business Review, 20(1), 133-150.

  • Leff, N. (1976). Capital markets in the less developed countries: The group principle. Money and Finance in Economic Growth and Development, 3(1), 97-126.

  • Leff, N. H. (1978). Industrial organization and entrepreneurship in the developing countries: The economic groups. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 26(4), 661-675.

  • Lins, K. V., & Servaes, H. (2002). Is corporate diversification beneficial in emerging markets?. Financial Management, 31(2), 5-31.

  • Majumdar, S. K., & Chhibber, P. (1999). Capital structure and performance: Evidence from a transition economy on an aspect of corporate governance. Public Choice, 98(3), 287-305.

  • Manos, R., Murinde, V., & Green, C. J. (2012). Dividend policy and business groups: Evidence from Indian firms. International Review of Economics & Finance, 21(1), 42-56.

  • Martin, J. D., & Sayrak, A. (2003). Corporate diversification and shareholder value: a survey of recent literature. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9(1), 37-57.

  • Myers, S. C. (1984). The capital structure puzzle. The Journal of Finance, 39(3), 574-592.

  • Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187-221.

  • Rozeff, M. S. (1982). Growth, beta and agency costs as determinants of dividend payout ratios. Journal of Financial Research, 5(3), 249-259.

  • Singh, M., Nejadmalayeri, A., & Mathur, I. (2007). Performance impact of business group affiliation: An analysis of the diversification-performance link in a developing economy. Journal of Business Research, 60(4), 339-347.

  • Titman, S., & Wessels, R. (1988). The determinants of capital structure choice. The Journal of Finance, 43(1), 1-19.

  • Tobin, J. (1958). Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables. Econometrica, 26(1), 24-36.

  • Williamson, O. E. (1967). Hierarchical control and optimum firm size. Journal of Political Economy, 75(2), 123-138.


Abstract Views: 160

PDF Views: 0




  • Impact of Business Group Size and Diversification on Dividend Policy and Payouts:Evidence from Indian Companies

Abstract Views: 160  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Nishant B. Labhane
School of Management, Presidency University, Bengaluru 560064, Karnataka, India
Jitendra Mahakud
Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur 721306, West Bengal, India

Abstract


This paper investigates how the decision of likelihood of dividend payments and the dividend payout level decision vary within business-group-affiliated firms by utilizing 781 sample firms listed on National Stock Exchange (NSE) during 1995-2015. This study is different from previous studies as it examines the impact of business-group size and diversification on dividend policy and payouts considering exhaustive list of explanatory variables taken from major theories of dividend policy during post-liberalization and second-generation reform period in India. The comparative analysis results indicate that the dividend payout ratio increases with the increase in the level of groups’ size and diversification during the entire study period as well as during the post-liberalization and the second-generation reform period. The econometric results indicate that the larger and diversified business-group-affiliated firms are lesser sensitive to investment opportunities, financial leverage, the firm’s maturity, and profitability as compared with the standalone and the other business-group-affiliated firms.

Keywords


Dividends, Dividend policy, Diversified business-groups, Emerging financial markets, Internal capital markets.

References