South Asian Journal of Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Consumer-Based Brand Equity:Does Country of Origin (COO) Matter to Generation Z Consumers?


Affiliations
1 Jaipuria Institute of Management, A-32A, Sector- 62, Noida (UP), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Brand equity refers to the value added to a brand due to its name and it endows the brand with several advantages, such as, better margins, better quality perceptions, brand loyalty and opportunities for brand extensions. Although the concept of brand equity has drawn the attention of researchers in past, the focus has been primarily on marketing mix elements and certain critical elements such as Country of Origin (COO) have been ignored. Further, brands cannot ignore Generation Z due to their ability to influence decisions and purchasing power. The current study intends to understand the role of COO image on the these young consumers so as to help firms in shaping their marketing strategies by establishing relationships between different variables such as COO image, perceived brand quality, brand loyalty and overall brand equity. Data were gathered through personally administered questionnaires distributed to 466 Generation Z respondents in India by using three categories as product stimuli: electronic gadgets; apparels and accessories. Among the three independent variables investigated in this study, brand loyalty had the most significant impact on brand equity. Our findings also show a significant positive role of perceived quality in influencing brand equity; perceived quality’s insignificant influence on brand loyalty; and COO image’s positive influence on brand equity. The findings however do not show any significant influence of COO image on quality perceptions of Generation Z consumers. Important theoretical and managerial contributions of the study have been discussed before providing limitations and directions for future research.

Keywords

Brand Equity, Brand Loyalty, Country of Origin (COO), Generation Z, Perceived Quality.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity: capitalizing on the value of a brand name. New York: The Free Press.

  • Aaker, D. A. (1992). The value of brand equity. Journal of Business Strategy, 13(4), 27-32.

  • Agarwal, M. K., & Rao, V. R. (1996). An empirical comparison of consumer-based measures of brand equity. Marketing Letters, 7(3), 237-247.

  • Amatulli, C., & Guido, G. (2011). Determinants of purchasing intention for fashion luxury goods in the Italian market: a laddering approach. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 15(1), 123-136.

  • Anand, M., Singh, J., & Gandhi,K. (2018). An empirical study on the relevance of Advertising, sales promotions, R&D, and training & development expenses on Firm value in the Indian context, South Asian Journal of Management, 25(3), 7-31.

  • Ashaduzzaman, M., Hoque, I., & Mahbub, F. (2018). Factors influencing bike purchase decision: A study of consumers in Bangladesh, South Asian Journal of Management, 25(1),129-149.

  • Askegaard, S., & Ger, G. (1997). Product-Country Images: Towards a contextualized approach. European Advances in Consumer Research, 3, 50-57.

  • Bagozzi, R. P. (1994). Structural Equation Models in Marketing Research: Basic Principles. In R. P. Bagozzi (ed.), Principles of Marketing Research, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 125-140.

  • Baker, J. M., & Ballington, L. (2002). Country-of-origin as a source of competitive advantage. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 10(1), 157-168.

  • Biel, A. L. (1992). How brand image drives brand equity. Journal of Advertising, 32(6), RC6-13.

  • Biel, A. L. (1993). Converting Image into Equity. in D. A. Aaker., & A. L. Biel (eds.). Brand Equity and Advertising: Advertising’s Role in Building Strong Brands. Lawrence Erlbaum. London.

  • Bilkey, W. J., & Nes, E. (1982). Country-of-origin effects on product evaluations. Journal of International Business Studies, 13(1), 89-99.

  • Bowen, J. T., & Shoemaker, S. (1998). Loyalty: A strategic commitment. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 39(1), 12-25.

  • Chao, P. (1998). Impact of country of origin dimensions on product quality and design quality perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 42(1), 1-6.

  • Chaudhuri, A. (1995). Brand equity or double jeopardy? Journal of Product & Brand Management, 4(1), 26-32.

  • Chaudhuri, A. (2002). How brand reputation affects the advertising brand equity link? Journal of Advertising Research, 42(3), 33-43.

  • Chi, H. K., Yeh, H. R., & Chio, C. Y. (2009). The effect of brand affect on female cosmetic user brand loyalty in Taiwan. The Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 14, 230-236.

  • Cobb-Walgren, C. J., Beal, C., & Donthu, N. (1995). Brand equity brand preferences, and purchase intent. Journal of Advertising, 24(3), 25-40.

  • Cordell, V. V. (1991). Competitive context and price as moderators of country-oforiginal preferences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19(2), 123-135.

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests, Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.

  • Cronin, J. J., & Hult, G. T. M. (2000). Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 193-218.

  • de Chernatony, L., Harris, F. J., & Christodoulides, G. (2004).Developing a brand performance measure for financial services brands. Services Industries Journal, 24(2),15-33.

  • de kimpe, M., Steenkamp, J. B., Mellens, M., & Abeele, P. (1997). Decline and variability in brand loyalty. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 14(5), 405-420.

  • Dinnie, K. (2004). Country-of-Origin 1965-2004: A literature review. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 3, 165-213.

  • Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory. Journal of Marketing Research, XIX(November), 440-452

  • Fornell, C. G., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.

  • Garma, R., Polonsky, M. J., & Wong, C. Y. (2008). The impact of consumer ethnocentrism and country-oforigin sub-components for high involvement products on young Chinese consumers’ product assessments. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 20(4), 455-476.

  • Hall, W., & Keynes, M. (2011). The net generation and digital natives implications for higher education. higher education academy, 1–56. Accessed on Aug 25, 2018 at http://oro.open.ac.uk/30014/1/Jones_and_Shao-Final.pdf

  • Hsich, M. H. (2004). An investigation of Country-of-Origin effect using correspondence analysis: a cross national context. International Journal of Market Research, 46(3), 267-295.

  • Hsu, C.H.C., Oh, H., & Assaf, A.G. (2012). A customer-based brand equity model for upscale hotels. Journal of Travel Research, 51(1), 81-93.

  • Javalgi, R. G., Cutler, B. D., & Winans, W. A. (2001) ‘At your service! Does country-of-origin research apply to services? Journal of Services Marketing, 15(7), 565-582.

  • Kaynak, E., & Cavusgil, T. S. (1983). Consumer attitudes towards products of foreign origin: do they vary across product classes? International Journal of Advertising, 2(2), 147-57.

  • Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1-22.

  • Keller, K. L. (2001). Building customer-based brand equity: A blueprint for creating strong brands. Marketing Science Institute, 01-107, 1-38.

  • Keller, K. L. (2003). Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring and Managing Brand Equity, 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

  • Khan, M. A., & Mahmood, Z. (2012). Impact of brand loyalty factors on brand equity. International Journal of Academic Research, 4(1), 33-37.

  • Kim, C. K. (1995). Brand popularity and country image in global competition: managerial implications. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 4(5), 21-33.

  • Kitchen, P. J., & Proctor, T. (2015). Marketing communications in a postmodern world. Journal of Business Strategy, 36(5), 34-42.

  • Leclerc, F., Schmitt, B. H., & Dube, L. (1994). Foreign branding and its effects on product perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 263-70.

  • Levy, S., & Guterman, H. G. (2012). Does advertising matter to store brand purchase intention? A conceptual framework. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 21(2), 89-97.

  • Lim, J.-S., Darley, W. K., & Summers, J. O. (1994). An assessment of country of origin effects under alternative presentation formats. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22(3), 274-282.

  • Llosa, S., Chandon, J. L., & Orsingher, C. (1998). An empirical study of SERVQUAL’s dimensionality. The Services Industries Journal, 18(2), 16-44.

  • Mackay, M. M. (2001). Evaluation of Brand Equity Measures: Further Empirical Results. The Journal of Product and Brand Management, 10(1), 38-51.

  • Nebenzahl, I. D., Jaffe, E. D., & Lampert, S. I. (1997). Towards a theory of country image effect on product evaluation, Management International Review, 37(1), 27-49.

  • Norjaya, M. Y, Mohd N. N, & Osman M, (2007).Does image of country-of-origin matter to brand equity?. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 16(1), 38-48

  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Papadopoulos, N., & Heslop, L. (2002). Country equity and country branding: Problems and prospects’, Brand Management, 9(4-5), 294-314.

  • Pappu, R., Quester, G. P., & Cooksey, W. R. (2005).Consumer based brand equity: improving the measurement – empirical evidence. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 14(3), 143-154.

  • Pappu, R., Quester, G. P., & Cooksey, W. R. (2006), Consumer-based brand equity and country of origin relationships. European Journal of Marketing, 40(5/6), 696-717.

  • Pappu, R., Quester, G. P., & Cooksey, W. R. (2007).Country image and consumer based brand equity: relationship and implications for international marketing. Journal of International Business Studies, 3, 726-745.

  • Parameswaran, R., & Yaprak, A. (Spring, 1987). A cross-national comparison of consumer research measures. Journal of International Business Studies, 18, 35-49.

  • Paswan, A. K., Kulkarni, S., & Ganesh, G. (2003). Loyalty towards the country, the state and the service brands. The Journal of Brand Management, 10(3), 233-251.

  • Palfrey J., & Gasser, U. 2008. Born Digital: Understanding the First Generation of Digital Natives. Basic Books, New York.

  • Pharr, J. M. (2005). Synthesizing country-of-origin research from the last decade: is the concept still salient in an era of global brands. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 13(4), 34-45.

  • Rajh, E. (2005). The effects of marketing mix elements on brand equity, 102, 30-59. Retrieved Aug 25, 2018, from http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/9601

  • Roth, M. S., & Romeo, J. B. (1992). Matching product category and country image perceptions: a framework for managing country-of-origin effects. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(3), 477-497.

  • Rundle-Thiele, S., & Bennett, R. (2001). A brand for all seasons? A discussion of brand loyalty approaches and their applicability for different markets. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 10(1), 25-37.

  • Samiee, S. (1994). Customer evaluation of products in a global market. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(3), 579-604.

  • Shocker, A. D., Srivastava, R. K., & Rueckert, R. W. (1994). Challenges and opportunities facing brand management: An introduction to a special issue. Journal of Marketing Research, 149-158.

  • Srikatanyoo, N., & Gnoth, J. (2002). Country image and international tertiary education. Journal of Brand Management, 10 (2), 139-48.

  • Tong, X., & Hawley, J. M. (2009). Measuring customer-based brand equity: Empirical evidence from the sportswear market in China. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 18(4), 262-271.

  • Torres, A., Bijmolt, T. H. A., Tribó, J. A., & Verhoef, P. (2013). Generating global brand equity through corporate social responsibility to key stakeholders. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(1), 13-24.

  • Usunier, J.C., & Cestre, G. (2008). Further considerations on the relevance of country-of-origin research. European Management Review, 5, 271-4.

  • Villarejo-Ramos, A. F., & Sánchez-Franco, M. J. (2005). The impact of marketing communication and price promotion on brand equity. The Journal of Brand Management, 12(6), 431-444.

  • Washburn, J. H., & Plank, R. E. (2002). Measuring brand equity: An evaluation of a consumer-based brand equity scale. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 10(1), 46-62.

  • Xu, J. B., & Chan, A. (2010). A conceptual framework of hotel experience and customer-based brand equity: some research questions and implications. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 22(2), 174-193.

  • Yasin, N. M., Noor, M. N., & Mohamad, O. (2007). Does image of country-oforigin matter to brand equity? Journal of Product and Brand Management, 16(1), 38-48.

  • Yoo, B., Donthu, N., & Lee, S. (2000). An examination of selected marketing mix elements and brand equity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 195-211.

  • Yoo, B., & Donthu, N. (2001). Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale. Journal of Business Research, 52(1), 1-14.

  • Young, A. M., & Hinesly, M. D. (2012). Identifying Millennials’ key influencers from early childhood: Insights into current consumer preferences. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(2), 146-155.

  • Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: a meansend model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.


Abstract Views: 196

PDF Views: 1




  • Consumer-Based Brand Equity:Does Country of Origin (COO) Matter to Generation Z Consumers?

Abstract Views: 196  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Rajesh Sharma
Jaipuria Institute of Management, A-32A, Sector- 62, Noida (UP), India

Abstract


Brand equity refers to the value added to a brand due to its name and it endows the brand with several advantages, such as, better margins, better quality perceptions, brand loyalty and opportunities for brand extensions. Although the concept of brand equity has drawn the attention of researchers in past, the focus has been primarily on marketing mix elements and certain critical elements such as Country of Origin (COO) have been ignored. Further, brands cannot ignore Generation Z due to their ability to influence decisions and purchasing power. The current study intends to understand the role of COO image on the these young consumers so as to help firms in shaping their marketing strategies by establishing relationships between different variables such as COO image, perceived brand quality, brand loyalty and overall brand equity. Data were gathered through personally administered questionnaires distributed to 466 Generation Z respondents in India by using three categories as product stimuli: electronic gadgets; apparels and accessories. Among the three independent variables investigated in this study, brand loyalty had the most significant impact on brand equity. Our findings also show a significant positive role of perceived quality in influencing brand equity; perceived quality’s insignificant influence on brand loyalty; and COO image’s positive influence on brand equity. The findings however do not show any significant influence of COO image on quality perceptions of Generation Z consumers. Important theoretical and managerial contributions of the study have been discussed before providing limitations and directions for future research.

Keywords


Brand Equity, Brand Loyalty, Country of Origin (COO), Generation Z, Perceived Quality.

References