South Asian Journal of Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

An Empirical Study on the Relevance of Advertising, Sales Promotion, R&D and Training and Development Expenses on Firm Value in the Indian Context


Affiliations
1 Management Development Institute Gurgaon, Gurugram 122007, India
2 University Institute of Applied Management Sciences (UIAMS), Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India
3 University Business School (UBS), Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Discretionary expenses: R&D, advertisement, and training and development create intangible assets such as, innovative products, brand equity, and intellectual capital. Literature survey suggests that intangibles drive long-term value of the firm and reduce its systematic risk. Sales promotion expenses though create value in short-term, but dilute brand equity in the longterm and are a zero sum game. The present study has captured value relevance of such discretionary expenses on firm value in the Indian context. Positive and significant impact of sales promotion and training and development on firm value (Tobin’s q) in current year has been observed. Sales promotion impacts favorably in short-term, while no significant impact of R&D spend on firm value has been observed. Positive impact of training and development expenses on firm value has been captured and it does not dissipate with time. It emerges that firms may take holistic view of these discretionary expenses.

Keywords

Advertisement and Sales Promotion, Brand Value, Discretionary Expenses, Firm Value, Research and Development.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Abowd, J. M., Milkovich, G.T. & Hannon, J. M. (1990). The effect of human resource management decisions on shareholder value. ILR Review, 43(3), 203-S-236-S.

  • Adler, P. S. (1988). Managing flexible automation. California Management Review, 30(3), 34-56.

  • Arthur, J. B. (1994). Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 670-687.

  • Barney, J. (1986). Organization culture: Can it be a source of competitive advantage? Academy of Management Review, 11, 656-665.

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.

  • Barney, J. (1995). Looking inside for competitive advantage. Academy of Management Executive, 9(4), 49-51.

  • Becker, B., & Gerhart, B. (1996). The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: Progress and prospects. Academy of Management, 39(4), 779-801.

  • Becker, B. E., Huselid, M. A., & Ulrich, D. (2001). The HR scorecard: Linking people, strategy, and performance. Harvard Business Press.

  • Begin, J. P. (1991). Strategic employment policy: An organizational systems perspective. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  • Ben-Zion, U. (1978). The investment aspect of non-productive expenditures: An empirical test. Journal of Economics and Business, (Spring/summer), 224-229.

  • Bharadwaj, A. S., Bharadwaj, S. G., & Konsynski, B. R. (1999). Information Technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin’s q. Management Science, 45(6), 1008-1024.

  • Blattberg, R. C., & Neslin, S. A. (1989). Sales promotion: The long and the short of it. Marketing Letters, 1(1), 81-97.

  • Boselie, P. G., Dietz, G., & Boon, C. (2005). Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research. Human Resource Management Journal, 15(3), 67-94.

  • Bublitz, B., & Ettredge, M. (1989). The information in discretionary outlays: Advertising, research, and development. The Accounting Review, LXIV(1), 108-124.

  • Butler, J. E., Ferris, G. R., & Napier, N. K. (1991). Strategy and human resources management. Cincinnati: South-Western.

  • Castellanos, R. M. M., & Martin, M. Y. S. (2011). Training as a source of competitive advantage: performance impact and role of firm strategy, the Spanish case. Human Resource Management, 22(3), 574-594.

  • Chadwick, C., & Dabu, A. (2009). Human resources, human resource management, and the competitive advantage of firms: Toward a more comprehensive model of casual linkages. Organization Science, 20(1), 253-272.

  • Chakravarty, A., & Grewal, R. (2011). The stock market in the driver’s seat! Implications for R&D and marketing. Management Science, 57(9), 1594-1609.

  • Chan, L. K. C., Lakonishoki, J., & Sougiannis, T. (2001). The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures. Journal of Finance, LVI(6), 2431-2456.

  • Chan, S. H., Martin, J. D., & Kensinger, J. W. (1990). Corporate research and development expenditures and share prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 26, 255-77.

  • Chauvin, K. W., & Hirschey, M. (1993). Advertising, R&D expenditures, and the market value of the firm. Financial Management, Winter, 128-140.

  • Cheng, Q., Lee, J., & Shevlin, T. (2016). Internal governance and real earnings management. The Accounting Review, 91(4), 1051-1085.

  • Chung, K. H., Wright, P., & Charoenwong, C. (1998). Investment opportunities and market reaction to capital expenditure decisions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22, 41-60.

  • Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(November), 386-405.

  • Cumming, D. J., & Macintosh, J. G. (2000). The determinants of R&D expenditure: A study of the Canadian Biotechnology industry. Review of Industrial Organization, 17, 357-370.

  • Delaney, J. T., & Huselid, M. A. (1996). The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 949-969.

  • Dutta, S., Narasimhan, O., & Rajiv, S. (1999). Success in high-technology markets: Is marketing capability critical? Marketing Science, 18(4), 547-568.

  • Eng, L. L., & Keh, H. T. (2007). The effects of advertising and brand value on future operating and market performance, Journal of Advertising, 36(4), 91-100.

  • Erickson, G., & Jacobson, R. (1992). Gaining comparative advantage through discretionary expenditures: The returns to R&D and advertising. Management Science, 38(9), 1264-1279.

  • Fahlenbrach, R., & Stulz, R. M. (2009). Managerial ownership, dynamics and firm value. Journal of Financial Economics, 92, 342-361.

  • Falk, M. (2012). Quantile estimates of the impact of R&D intensity on firm performance. Small Business Economics, 39, 19-37.

  • Fey, C. F., Morgulis-Yakushev, S., Park, H. J., & Bjorkman, I. (2009). Opening the balck box of the relationship between HRM practices and firm performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(4), 690-712.

  • Filbeck, G., Zhao, X., Tompkins, D., & Chong, P. (2009). Share price reaction to advertising announcements and broadcast of media events. Managerial and Decision Economics, 30, 253-264.

  • Fisher, C. D. (1989). Current and recurrent challenges in human resource management. Journal of Management, 15, 157-180.

  • Gande, A., Schenzler, C., and Senbet, L. W. (2009). Valuation effects of global diversification. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, 1515-1532.

  • Graham, Jr., R. C., & Frankenberger, K. D. (2000). The contribution of changes in advertising expenditures to earnings and market values. Journal of Business Research, 50, 149-155.

  • Griliches, Z. (1981). Market value, R&D, and patents. Economic Letters, 7(2), 183-187.

  • Gunny, K. A. (2010). The relation between earnings management using real activities manipulation and future performance: Evidence from meeting earnings benchmarks. Contemporary Accounting Research, 27(3), 855-888.

  • Gupta, S., Lehmann, D. R., and Stuart, J. A. (2004). Valuing customers. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(1), 7-18.

  • Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the future. Harvard Business Press: Boston, MA.

  • Hirschey, M. (1982). Intangible capital aspects of advertising and R&D expenditures. Journal of Industrial Economics, 30, 375-390.

  • Hirschey, M. (1985). Market structure and market value. Journal of Business, 58(1), 89-98.

  • Hirschey, M and Weygandt. J. (1985). Amortization policy for advertising and research and development expenditures. Journal of Accounting Research, 23, 326-335.

  • Ho, Y. K., Tjahjapranata, M., & Yap, C. M. (2006). Size, leverage, concentration, and R&D investment in generating growth opportunities. Journal of Business, 79(2), 851-876.

  • Huselid, M. A. (1994). The impact of environmental volatility on human resource planning and strategic human resource management. Human Resource Planning, 16(3), 35-51.

  • Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3),635-672.

  • Huselid, M. A., Jackson, S. E., & Schuler, R. S. (1997). Technical and strategic human resource management effectiveness as determinants of firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 171-188.

  • Itami, H., & Roehl, T. E. (1987). Mobilizing Invisible Assets. Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press.

  • Jackson, S. E., & Schuler, R.S. (1995). Understanding human resource management in the context of organizations and their environment. In M. R. Rosenzweig., & L. W. Porter. (Eds). Annual Review of of Psychology, 46, 237-264.

  • Jedidi, K., Mela, C. F., & Gupta, S. (1999). Managing advertising and promotion for long-run profitability. Marketing Science, 18(1), 1-22.

  • Johnson, J. (1967). A consequential approach to accounting for R&D. Journal of Accounting Research, (Autumn), 164-172.

  • Johnson, L. D., & Pazderka, B. (1993). Firm value and investment in R&D. Managerial and Decision Economics, 14, 15-24.

  • Jose, M. L., Nichols, L. M., & Stevens, J. L. (1986). Contributions of diversification, promotion, and R&D to the value of multiproduct firms: A Tobin’s q approach. Financial Management, Winter, 33-42.

  • Kerin, R. A., & Sethuraman, R. (1998). Exploring the brand value-shareholder value nexus for consumer goods company. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(4), 260-273.

  • Kim, C., & Bettis, R. A. (2014). Cash is surprisingly valuable as a strategic asset. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 2053-2063.

  • Kim, M., & McAlister, L. M. (2011). Stock market reaction to unexpected growth in marketing expenditure: Negative for sales force, contingent on spending levels for advertising. Journal of Marketing, 75(July), 68-85.

  • Kraft, A. G., Vashishtha, R., & Venkatachalam, M. (2018). Frequent financial reporting and managerial myopia, The Accounting Review, 93(2), 249-275.

  • Krishnan, H. A., Tadepalli, R., & Park, D. (2009). R&D intensity, marketing intensity, and organizational performance. Journal of Management Issues, XXI(2), 232-244.

  • Lang, L. H. P., & Stulz, R. M. (1994). Tobin’s q, corporate diversification, and firm performance. Journal of Political Economy, 102(6), 1248-1280.

  • Laursen, K., & Foss, N. J. (2003). New human resource management practices, complementarities and the impact on innovation performance. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27(2), 243-263.

  • Lengnick-Hall, C. A., & Lengnick-Hall, M. A. (1988). Strategic human resource management: a review of the literature and a proposed typology. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 454-470.

  • Lewllen, W. G., & Badrinath, S. G. (1997). On the measurement of Tobin’s q. Journal of Financial Economics, 44, 77-122.

  • Lindenberg, E. B., & Ross, S. (1981). Tobin’s q ratio and industrial organization.The Journal of Business, 54(1), 1-32.

  • Luo, X. (2008). When marketing strategy first meets Wall Street: Marketing spending and firms’ initial public offerings. Journal of Marketing, 72(September), 98-109.

  • Luo, X., Homburg, C., & Wieseke, J (2010). Customer satisfaction, analyst stock recommendations, and firm value. Journal of Marketing Research, XLVII (December), 1041-1058.

  • Lustgarten, S., & Thomadakis, S. (1987). Mobility barriers and Tobin’s q. Journal of Business, 60(4), 519-537.

  • Mahoney, T. A., & Deckop, J. R. (1986). Evolution of concept and practice in personnel administration and human resource management. Journal of Management, 12, 223-241.

  • McAlister, L., Srinivasan, R., & Kim, MinChung (2007). Advertising, research and development, and systematic risk of the firm. Journal of Marketing, 71(January), 35-48.

  • Mela, C. F., Jedidi, K., & Bowman, D. (1998). The long-term impact of promotions on consumer stockpiling behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(2), 250-262.

  • Milburn, A. (1971). An empirical study of the relationship of research and development expenditures to subsequent benefits. Department of Accountancy, University of Illinois.

  • Miller, M. H., & Modigliani, F. (1961). Dividend Policy growth and the valuation of the shares. Journal of Business, 34(4), 411-433.

  • Morck, R., & Yeung, B. (1991). Why investors value multi-nationality. Journal of Business, 64(2), 165-187.

  • Newman, M. (1968). Equating return from R&D expenditures. Financial Executive (April), 26-33.

  • O’Brien, J. P., & Folta, T. B. (2009). A transaction cost perspective on why, how, and when cash impacts firm performance. Managerial and Decision Economics, 30(7), 465-479.

  • Parcharidis, E. G., & Varsakelis, N. C. (2010). R&D and Tobin’s q in an emerging financial market: the case of the Athens Stock Exchange. Managerial and Decision Economics, 31, 353-361.

  • Peters, R. H., & Taylor, L. A. (2017). Intangible capital and the investment-q relation. Journal of Financial Economics, 123, 251-272.

  • Peters, T., & Waterman, R. (1982). In search of excellence. New York: Harper & Row.

  • Pfeffer, J. (1994). Competitive advantage through people. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

  • Prahalad, C. K. (1983). Developing strategic capability: an agenda for top management. Human Resource Management, Autumn, 22(3) 237-254.

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-89.

  • Raithatha, M., & Komera, S. (2016). Executive compensation and firm performance: evidence from Indian firms. IIMB Management Review, 28, 160-189.

  • Rao, R. K. S., & Bharadwaj, N. (2008). Marketing initiatives, expected cash flows, and shareholders’ wealth. Journal of Marketing, 72(January), 16-26.

  • Rizov, M., & Croucher, R. (2009). Human resource management and performance in European firms. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33, 253-272.

  • Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory & models. In Strategic Management: A new view of business policy and planning, D. E. Schendel., & C. Hofer. (Ed.), Boston, Little, Brown & Co., 196-212.

  • Russell, J. S., Terborg, J. R., & Powers, M. L. (1985). Organizational performance and organizational level training and support. Personnel Psychology, 38, 849-863.

  • Sahay, A., & Pilai, A. (2009). Differential impact of advertising and distribution expenditure on Tobin’s q: A perspective from listed firms in India. Journal of Indian Business Research, 1(2/3), 77-94.

  • Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investments in human capital. American Economic Review, 1-17.

  • Shevlin, T. (1991). The valuation of R&D firms with R&D limited partnerships. The Accounting Review, 66, 1-21.

  • Smirlock, M., Gilligan, T., & Marshall, W. (1984).Tobin’s q and the structureperformance relationship. American Economic Review, 74, 1051-1060.

  • Srinivasan, R., Lilien, G. L., & Sridhar, S. (2011). Should firms spend more on research and development and advertising during recessions? Journal of Marketing, 75, 49-65.

  • Srivastava, R. K., Shervani, T. A., & Fahey, L. (1998). Market-based assets and shareholder value: A framework for analysis. Journal of Marketing, 62(1), 2-18.

  • Truss, C., & Gratton, L. (1994). Strategic human resource management: A International Journal of Human Resource Management, 5, 663-686.

  • Tseng, C-V., & Geo, Y-Jia J (2005). Intellectual capital and corporate value in an emerging economy: empirical study of Taiwanese manufacturers. R&D Management, 35(2), 187-201.

  • Vorst, P. (2016). Real Earnings Management and Long-Term Operating Performance: The Role of Reversals in Discretionary Investment Cuts. The Accounting Review, 91(4), 1219-1256.

  • Welbourne, T. M., & Andrews, A. O. (1996). Predicting the performance of initial public offerings: Should human resource management be in the equation? Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 891-919.

  • Winter, S. G. (1987). Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets. In David Teece (Ed.), The Competitive Challenges: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal, Cambridge, Ballinger Publishing Company, 159-184.

  • Wright, P. M., McMahan, G. C., & McWilliams, A. (1994). Human resources and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based perspective. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 5, 301-326.

  • Youndt, M. A., Snell, S. A., Dean Jr., J. W., & Lepak, D. P. (1996). Human resource management, manufacturing strategy, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 830-866.


Abstract Views: 171

PDF Views: 0




  • An Empirical Study on the Relevance of Advertising, Sales Promotion, R&D and Training and Development Expenses on Firm Value in the Indian Context

Abstract Views: 171  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Manoj Anand
Management Development Institute Gurgaon, Gurugram 122007, India
Jagandeep Singh
University Institute of Applied Management Sciences (UIAMS), Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India
Karan Gandhi
University Business School (UBS), Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India

Abstract


Discretionary expenses: R&D, advertisement, and training and development create intangible assets such as, innovative products, brand equity, and intellectual capital. Literature survey suggests that intangibles drive long-term value of the firm and reduce its systematic risk. Sales promotion expenses though create value in short-term, but dilute brand equity in the longterm and are a zero sum game. The present study has captured value relevance of such discretionary expenses on firm value in the Indian context. Positive and significant impact of sales promotion and training and development on firm value (Tobin’s q) in current year has been observed. Sales promotion impacts favorably in short-term, while no significant impact of R&D spend on firm value has been observed. Positive impact of training and development expenses on firm value has been captured and it does not dissipate with time. It emerges that firms may take holistic view of these discretionary expenses.

Keywords


Advertisement and Sales Promotion, Brand Value, Discretionary Expenses, Firm Value, Research and Development.

References