South Asian Journal of Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Motivations of Distributor Sales Executives (DSEs) in the Telecom Sector:An Exploratory Study in the State of Jharkhand, India


Affiliations
1 ICFAI University Jharkhand (IUJ), Plot No. 2065, Daladali Chowk, Simalia, Near Ring Road, Ranchi 835222, India
2 International Management Institute Bhubaneswar (IMIB), IDCO Plot No 1, Gothapatna, PO: Malipada, Bhubaneswar 751003, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


In the recent years, there has been an emergence of a new entity called the Distribution Sales Executive (DSE) in the telecom industry in India. A DSE is a ‘sales executive’ attached to the distributor. This leads to ambiguity in role ownership, guidance and regulations which in turn leads to exploitation of the DSE leading to low motivation of the DSE. Motivational literature has extensively studied salaried on-roll employees but very few studies have touched on the aspect of off-roll employees. This research is an attempt to fill the lacuna. The study was carried out in the state of Jharkhand (India). It hypothesized that marketing support (MKTSUP), recognition support (RECOGSUP) and career progression support (PROGSUP) would have direct positive effect on motivation of the DSE. PLS-SEM was used to explore the hypothesized model. It was found that marketing support (MKTSUP) had a negative impact and progression support (PROGSUP) has no impact on motivation. The recognition support (RECOGSUP)—both from organisation, social standing amongst peers and community—emerged as a key factor in motivation of DSE. It is hoped that the results of the study would provide better understanding as to the motivations of DSE for the corporates and will stimulate further research on the topic.

Keywords

Distribution, Motivation, PLS-SEM, Sales Executive, Telecom.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Abraham, R. K. (2013, 19 April 2016). Cities and Towns Retrieved 18 November, 2017, from http://www.arthapedia.in/index.php?title=Cities_and_Towns

  • Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422-436.

  • Alderfer, C. P. (1969). An empirical test of a new theory of human needs. Organisational Behaviour and Human Performance, 4, 142-175.

  • Bhat, S., & Shah, H. (2010). Managing Work Motivation at the Bottom - A Case from Footwear Manufacturing Organization in India. . Vilakshan: The XIMB Journal of Management, 7(1), 141-162.

  • Bhattacharjee, D. (2016). Problems and Prospects of Network Marketing in Assam (India). International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 5(2), 167-182.

  • Bodla, M. A., & Naeem, B. (2008). Relevance of Herzberg’s Theory to Pharmaceutical Salesforce in Pakistan. The International Journal of Knowlede, Culture, & Change Management, 8(2), 151-158.

  • Buciuniene, I., & Skudiene, V. (2009). Factors Influencing Salespeople Motivation and Relationship with the Organization in B2B Sector Inzinerine Ekonomika Engineering Economics, 4, 78-85.

  • Chaudhary, N., & Sharma, B. (2012). Impact of Employee Motivation on Performance (Productivity) In Private Organization. International Journal of Business Trends and Technology, 2(4), 29-35.

  • Chitra, K., & Badrinath, V. (2014). Movitation as a Tool to Hold Back the Employees-A Pragmatic Study with Reference to Indian Banking Sector. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 12(4), 491-500.

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent and asymptotically normal PLS estimators for linear structural equations. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 81(1), 10-23.

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research 18(1), 39-50.

  • Garson, G. D. (2016). Partial Least Squares: Regression & Structural Equation Modelling. North Carolina State University: Statistical Associates Publishing.

  • Government of India. (2016). Model Guidelines on Direct Selling. New Delhi Department of Consumer Affairs Retrieved from https://consumeraffairs.nic.in/writereaddata/Direct%20Selling%20guidelines.pdf.

  • Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. M. (2004). A Beginner’s Guide to Partial Least Squares Analysis. Understanding Statistics, 3(4), 283-297.

  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-151.

  • Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A Primer on Partial LEast Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Henseler, J., & Dijkstra, T. K. (2015). ADANCO 2.0. Kleve, Germany: Composite Modeling. Retrieved from https://www.composite-modeling.com/

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-based Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.

  • Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The Motivation to Work (2 ed.). New York: John Wiley.

  • Jobber, D., & Lee, R. (1994). A Comparison of the Perceptions of Sales Management and Salespeople Towards Sales Force Motivation and Demotivation. Journal of Marketing Management, 10, 325-332.

  • Kock, N. (2016). Hypothesis Testing with Confidence Intervals and P values in PLS-SEM. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 12(3), 1-6.

  • Lacmanovic, D. (2010). Salespeople Motivation As Key Factor In Achieving Sales Management Goals In Hotel Industry Tourism and Hospitality Management, 12(2), 155-169.

  • Locke, E. A. (1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3(2), 157-189.

  • Malik, M. E., & Naeem, B. (2009). Motivational Preferences of Pharmaceutical Salesforce: Empirical Evidence From Pakistan. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 47(1), 19-30.

  • Maslow, A. H. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-396.

  • McClelland, D. C. (1961). The Achieving Society. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand.

  • McGregor, D. M. (1957, 9 April). The Human Side of Enterprise. Paper presented at the Adventure in Thought and Action, Proceedings of the Fifth Anniversary Convocation of the School of Industrial Management, Cambridge, MA.

  • Mitchell, T. R. (1982). Motivation: new direction for theory, research, and practices. Academy of Management Review, 7, 80-88.

  • Monecke, A., & Leisch, F. (2012). semPLS: Structural Equation Modeling Using Partial Least Squares. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(3), 1-32.

  • Mulky, A. G. (2013). Distribution Challenges and Workable Solutions. IIMB Management Review, 25(25), 179-195.

  • Robbins, S. P., Judge, T. A., & Vohra, N. (2016). Organizational Behavior (16 ed.). New Delhi: Pearson Education.

  • Sahoo, S. K., Routray, P., & Dash, A. K. (2014). Does Motivation Really Count for Sales force Performance in Pharmaceutical Industry? Business and Management Research, 3(2), 1-9.

  • Telecom Regulatory Authority of India. (2017). A Twenty Year Odyssey: 19972017. New Delhi, India: National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.

  • USLegal.com. (2017). Distributorships and Dealerships Law and Legal Definition Retrieved 30 October 2017, 2017, from https://definitions.uslegal.com/d/distributorships-and-dealerships/

  • Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley.

  • Wang, L., Prieto, L., & Hinriches, K. T. (2010). Direct and Indirect Effects of Individual and Environmental Factors on Motivation for Self-Employmen. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 15(4), 481-502.


Abstract Views: 164

PDF Views: 0




  • Motivations of Distributor Sales Executives (DSEs) in the Telecom Sector:An Exploratory Study in the State of Jharkhand, India

Abstract Views: 164  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Ajitabh Kumar Dubey
ICFAI University Jharkhand (IUJ), Plot No. 2065, Daladali Chowk, Simalia, Near Ring Road, Ranchi 835222, India
Rohit Vishal Kumar
International Management Institute Bhubaneswar (IMIB), IDCO Plot No 1, Gothapatna, PO: Malipada, Bhubaneswar 751003, India

Abstract


In the recent years, there has been an emergence of a new entity called the Distribution Sales Executive (DSE) in the telecom industry in India. A DSE is a ‘sales executive’ attached to the distributor. This leads to ambiguity in role ownership, guidance and regulations which in turn leads to exploitation of the DSE leading to low motivation of the DSE. Motivational literature has extensively studied salaried on-roll employees but very few studies have touched on the aspect of off-roll employees. This research is an attempt to fill the lacuna. The study was carried out in the state of Jharkhand (India). It hypothesized that marketing support (MKTSUP), recognition support (RECOGSUP) and career progression support (PROGSUP) would have direct positive effect on motivation of the DSE. PLS-SEM was used to explore the hypothesized model. It was found that marketing support (MKTSUP) had a negative impact and progression support (PROGSUP) has no impact on motivation. The recognition support (RECOGSUP)—both from organisation, social standing amongst peers and community—emerged as a key factor in motivation of DSE. It is hoped that the results of the study would provide better understanding as to the motivations of DSE for the corporates and will stimulate further research on the topic.

Keywords


Distribution, Motivation, PLS-SEM, Sales Executive, Telecom.

References