South Asian Journal of Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Study on the Formation of Organizational Legitimacy Perception of Newcomer Employees: Broadening the Organizational Justice-trust Relationship


Affiliations
1 Indian Institute of Management Raipur, Government Engineering College (GEC) Campus, Sejbahar, Raipur 492015, Chhattisgarh, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present study is based on the context of socialization in the formation of organizational legitimacy perception of newcomer employees. Specifically, it borrows from the legal socialization literature to broaden the implications of organizational justice by considering organizational legitimacy perception as an outcome. This study applies the organizational theories of fairness heuristic and psychological contract fulfillment to outline the process of formation of organizational legitimacy perception for newcomer employees. Further, it outlines the mediational role of trustworthiness and its multiple dimensions such as ability, benevolence, and integrity in the relationship between organizational justice and organizational legitimacy. Further, supervisor referent interpersonal justice has been examined to moderate this mediation. The findings suggest that the indirect relationship between interactional justice and legitimacy is partially mediated and indirect relationship between procedural justice and legitimacy is fully mediated through all the three dimensions of trustworthiness. Theoretical implications of the results are discussed as well.

Keywords

Organizational Justice, Trustworthiness, Organizational Legitimacy, Uncertainty, Socialization, Psychological Contract Fulfillment, Fairness Heuristic, Moderated Mediation.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Albert, S., Ashforth, B. E., & Dutton, J. E. (2000). Organizational identity and identification: Charting new waters and building new bridges. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 13-17.

  • Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34(3), 325-374.

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.ObO13e31812e5535

  • Augustyn, M. B. (2015). The (ir) relevance of procedural justice in the pathways to crime. Law and Human Behavior, 39(4), 388.

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.

  • Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1994). Effect of newcomer involvement in workrelated activities: a longitudinal study of socialization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(2), 211.

  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Transaction Publishers.

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Sage.

  • Chao, G. T., O’Leary-Kelly, A. M., Wolf, S., Klein, H. J., & Gardner, P. D. (1994). Organizational socialization: Its content and consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(5), 730.

  • Colquitt, J. A., & Rodell, J. B. (2011). Justice, trust, and trustworthiness: A longitudinal analysis integrating three theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1183-1206.

  • Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900.

  • Fagan, J., & Piquero, A. R. (2007). Rational choice and developmental influences on recidivism among adolescent felony offenders. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4(4), 715-748.

  • Fagan, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2005). Legal socialization of children and adolescents. Social Justice Research, 18(3), 217-241.

  • Foa, E. B., & Foa, U. G. (1980). Resource theory. In Social exchange (pp. 77-94). Springer.

  • Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (2001). Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. In Advances in Organizational Justice, 1, 1-55.

  • Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(2), 340.

  • Greenberg, J., & Wiethoff, C. (2001). Organizational justice as proaction and reaction: Implications for research and application. In Justice in the workplace: From theory to practice, 2, 271-302.

  • Jackson, J., Huq, A. Z., Bradford, B., & Tyler, T. R. (2013). Monopolizing force? Police legitimacy and public attitudes toward the acceptability of violence. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19(4), 479.

  • Johnson, M., & Senges, M. (2010). Learning to be a programmer in a complex organization: A case study on practice-based learning during the onboarding process at Google. Journal of Workplace Learning, 22(3), 180-194.

  • Kong, D. T., & Barsness, Z. I. (2016). Perceived managerial (remote leader) trustworthiness as a moderator for the relationship between overall fairness and perceived supervisory (direct leader) trustworthiness. Current Psychology, 1-15.

  • Lavelle, J. J., Rupp, D. E., & Brockner, J. (2007). Taking a multifoci approach to the study of justice, social exchange, and citizenship behavior: The target similarity model. Journal of Management, 33(6), 841-866.

  • Lester, S. W., Turnley, W. H., Bloodgood, J. M., & Bolino, M. C. (2002). Not seeing eye to eye: Differences in supervisor and subordinate perceptions of and attributions for psychological contract breach. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(1), 39-56.

  • Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? In Social Exchange (pp. 27-55). Springer.

  • Lewicki, R. J., Wiethoff, C., & Tomlinson, E. C. (2005). What is the role of trust in organizational justice. In Handbook of Organizational Justice (pp. 247-270). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Louis, M. R. (1980). Surprise and sense making: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(2), 226-251.

  • Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (1999). The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1), 123.

  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.

  • Mayer, R. C., & Gavin, M. B. (2005). Trust in management and performance: Who minds the shop while the employees watch the boss? Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 874-888.

  • Morrison, E. W., & Robinson, S. L. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 226-256.

  • Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior. Lexington: D. C. Heath and Co.

  • Piquero, A. R., Fagan, J., Mulvey, E. P., Steinberg, L., & Odgers, C. (2005). Developmental trajectories of legal socialization among serious adolescent offenders. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 96(1), 267.

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891.

  • Restubog, S. L. D., Bordia, P., & Tang, R. L. (2006). Effects of psychological contract breach on performance of IT employees: The mediating role of affective commitment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79(2), 299-306.

  • Robinson, S. L., Kraatz, M. S., & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Changing obligations and the psychological contract: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 37(1), 137-152.

  • Robinson, S. L., & Morrison, E. W. (1995). Psychological contracts and OCB: The effect of unfulfilled obligations on civic virtue behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(3), 289-298.

  • Robinson, S. L., & Morrison, E. W. (2000). The development of psychological contract breach and violation: A longitudinal study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(5), 525-546.

  • Robinson, S. L., & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(3), 245-259.

  • Rousseau, D. M. (1990). New hire perceptions of their own and their employer’s obligations: A study of psychological contracts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11(5), 389-400.

  • Rupp, D. E., & Cropanzano, R. (2002). The mediating effects of social exchange relationships in predicting workplace outcomes from multifoci organizational justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89(1), 925-946.

  • Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (2007). An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 344-354.

  • Serva, M. A., Fuller, M. A., & Mayer, R. C. (2005). The reciprocal nature of trust: A longitudinal study of interacting teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(6), 625-648.

  • Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review, 37(3), 513-548.

  • Tankebe, J. (2013). Viewing things differently: The dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy. Criminology, 51(1), 103-135.

  • Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. L. Erlbaum Associates.

  • Thomas, H. D. C., & Anderson, N. (1998). Changes in newcomers’ psychological contracts during organizational socialization: A study of recruits entering the British Army. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 745-767.

  • Trinkner, R., & Cohn, E. S. (2014). Putting the “social” back in legal socialization: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and cynicism in legal and nonlegal authorities. Law and Human Behavior, 38(6), 602.

  • Trinkner, R., Tyler, T. R., & Goff, P. A. (2016). Justice from within: The relations between a procedurally just organizational climate and police organizational efficiency, endorsement of democratic policing, and officer well-being. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 22(2), 158.

  • Turnley, W. H., Bolino, M. C., Lester, S. W., & Bloodgood, J. M. (2003). The impact of psychological contract fulfillment on the performance of in-role and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 29(2), 187-206.

  • Tyler, T. R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 830.

  • Tyler, T. R. (2006a). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375-400.

  • Tyler, T. R. (2006b). Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press.


Abstract Views: 272

PDF Views: 0




  • A Study on the Formation of Organizational Legitimacy Perception of Newcomer Employees: Broadening the Organizational Justice-trust Relationship

Abstract Views: 272  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Shashank Mittal
Indian Institute of Management Raipur, Government Engineering College (GEC) Campus, Sejbahar, Raipur 492015, Chhattisgarh, India
Shubham Singh
Indian Institute of Management Raipur, Government Engineering College (GEC) Campus, Sejbahar, Raipur 492015, Chhattisgarh, India
Vivek Roy
Indian Institute of Management Raipur, Government Engineering College (GEC) Campus, Sejbahar, Raipur 492015, Chhattisgarh, India

Abstract


The present study is based on the context of socialization in the formation of organizational legitimacy perception of newcomer employees. Specifically, it borrows from the legal socialization literature to broaden the implications of organizational justice by considering organizational legitimacy perception as an outcome. This study applies the organizational theories of fairness heuristic and psychological contract fulfillment to outline the process of formation of organizational legitimacy perception for newcomer employees. Further, it outlines the mediational role of trustworthiness and its multiple dimensions such as ability, benevolence, and integrity in the relationship between organizational justice and organizational legitimacy. Further, supervisor referent interpersonal justice has been examined to moderate this mediation. The findings suggest that the indirect relationship between interactional justice and legitimacy is partially mediated and indirect relationship between procedural justice and legitimacy is fully mediated through all the three dimensions of trustworthiness. Theoretical implications of the results are discussed as well.

Keywords


Organizational Justice, Trustworthiness, Organizational Legitimacy, Uncertainty, Socialization, Psychological Contract Fulfillment, Fairness Heuristic, Moderated Mediation.

References