Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Evolution of Operational Improvement in Management Science/Operations Research (2000-2016):A Social Network Co-Word Analysis


Affiliations
1 Doctoral Student, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhongguancun Road East 80, Haidian District, Beijing, China
2 Associate Professor, School of Economics and Management, Beijing Information Science and Technology University, Beijing, China
3 Professor, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhongguancun Road East 80, Haidian District, Beijing, China
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This paper elucidates the process of evolution of Operational Improvement (OI) by a coword analysis based on data downloaded from the database of Web of Science. Our research reveals that the published papers indicate an overall growth trend during the selected 17 years and have a rapid increasing between 2002 and 2008 but hold a relatively stable growth in recent years. “Quality management” and “Lean and six sigma management” are direct and core themes of OI in most research phases since they appeared. Lean and six sigma management especially locates itself in the most critical position in the research field of OI in Management Science/Operations Research (MS/OR). Research methods, optimization algorithm and decision analysis provide support for the research of OI in most stages. In recent years, some peripheral research topics also appear as emerging topics in the research of OI which need pay more attention in future, such as service and CRM, healthcare services and risk and safety management. The operations improvement will have an immeasurable effect on the service and healthcare field. Network characteristic indexes indicate that the overall tightness of the keywords show a gradual declining trend with the timespan ongoing, the research themes’ dispersion of the second and third stage research points to some extent and keywords in the first and second stages has the higher degree of contact with the adjacent keywords.

Keywords

Co-Word Analysis, Continuous improvement, Lean and Six Sigma, Operational Improvement, Process Improvement, Quality Improvement, Social Network Analysis.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Abdulmouti, H. (2015). The role of kaizen (continuous improvement) in improving companies’ performance: A case study. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on of the Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (IEOM) (pp. 16). New York, NY: IEEE.
  • Ahire, S. L., Golhar, D. Y., & Waller, M. A. (1996). Development and validation of TQM implementation constructs. Decision Sciences, 27(1), 23-56.
  • Anand, G., Ward, P. T., Tatikonda, M. V., & Schilling, D. A. (2009). Dynamic capabilities through continuous improvement infrastructure. Journal of Operations Management, 27(6), 444-461.
  • Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (2018). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Breyfogle III, F. W. (2003). Implementing six sigma: Smarter solutions using statistical methods. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Breyfogle III, F. W., Cupello, J. M., & Meadows, B. (2000). Managing six sigma: A practical guide to understanding, assessing, and implementing the strategy that yields bottomline success. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Buffa, E. S. (1984). Meeting the competitive challenge: Manufacturing strategy for US companies. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin Professional Publishing.
  • Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., & Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry. Scientometrics, 22(1), 155-205.
  • Cherrafi, A., Elfezazi, S., Chiarini, A., Mokhlis, A., & Benhida, K. (2016). The integration of lean manufacturing, six sigma and sustainability: A literature review and future research directions for developing a specific model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 828-846.
  • Cobo, M. J., L´opez-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146-166.
  • Coetzee, R., Van der Merwe, K., & Van Dyk, L. (2016). Lean implementation strategies: how are the toyota way principles addressed? South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 27(3), 79-91.
  • Corrales-Garay, D., Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M., & Mora-Valentín, E. M. (2019). Knowledge areas, themes and future research on open data: A co-word analysis. Government Information Quarterly, 36(1), 77-87.
  • Costa, L. B. M., & Godinho Filho, M. (2016). Lean healthcare: review, classification and analysis of literature. Production Planning & Control, 27(10), 823-836.
  • Coulter, N., Monarch, I., & Konda, S. (1998). Software engineering as seen through its research literature: A study in co-word analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 49(13), 1206-1223.
  • De Koning, H., & De Mast, J. (2006). A rational reconstruction of six-sigma’s breakthrough cookbook. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 23(7), 766-787.
  • De Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2011). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • DelliFraine, J. L., Langabeer, J. R., & Nembhard, I. M. (2010). Assessing the evidence of six sigma and lean in the health care industry. Quality Management in Healthcare, 19(3), 211-225.
  • Dobrzykowski, D., Deilami, V. S., Hong, P., & Kim, S.-C. (2014). A structured analysis of operations and supply chain management research in healthcare (1982– 2011). International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 514-530.
  • Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., & Davarzani, H. (2015). Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 162,101-114.
  • Gijo, E., & Antony, J. (2014). Reducing patient waiting time in outpatient department using lean six sigma methodology. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 30(8), 1481-1491.
  • Glasgow, J. M., Scott-Caziewell, J. R., & Kaboli, P. J. (2010). Guiding inpatient quality improvement: a systematic review of lean and six sigma. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 36(12), 533-AP5.
  • Grossman, R. G. (1998). Quality improvement: an overview. The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing, 12(1), 42-50.
  • Harry, M., & Schroeder, R. R. (2005). Six Sigma: The breakthrough management strategy revolutionizing the world’s top corporations. New York, NY: Doubleday.
  • He, Q. (1999). Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Library Trends, 48(1), 133-59.
  • Hipkin, I., & De Cock, C. (2000). TQM and BPR: lessons for maintenance management. Omega, 28(3), 277-292.
  • Hou, K.-L., Lin, L.-C., & Huang, Y.-F. (2016). Integrated inventory models with process quality improvement under imperfect quality and carbon emissions. In Proceedings of 2016 IEEE International Conference on Mobile Services (MS) (pp. 166-169). New York, NY: IEEE.
  • Hutton, B., Salanti, G., Chaimani, A., Caldwell, D. M., Schmid, C., Thorlund, K., Mills, E., Catal´a-L´opez, F., Turner, L., & Altman, D. G. (2014). The quality of reporting methods and results in network meta-analyses: an overview of reviews and suggestions for improvement. PloS One, 9(3), e92508.
  • Imai, M. (1986). Kaizen: The key to Japan’s competitiveness success. New York, NY: McGraw Hill Higher Education.
  • Jacobs, B. W., Swink, M., & Linderman, K. (2015). Performance eects of early and late six sigma adoptions. Journal of Operations Management, 36, 244-257.
  • Jones, E. C., Parast, M. M., & Adams, S. G. (2010). A framework for eective six sigma implementation. Total Quality Management, 21(4), 415-424.
  • Jones-Farmer, L. A., Woodall, W. H., Steiner, S. H., & Champ, C. W. (2014). An overview of phase I analysis for process improvement and monitoring. Journal of Quality Technology, 46(3), 265-280.
  • Khasseh, A. A., Soheili, F., Moghaddam, H. S., and Chelak, A. M. (2017). Intellectual structure of knowledge in imetrics: A co-word analysis. Information Processing & Management, 53(3), 705-720.
  • Kosto, R. (1995). Federal research impact assessment: Axioms, approaches, applications. Scientometrics, 34(2), 163-206.
  • Kutucuoglu, K., Hamali, J., Irani, Z., & Sharp, J. (2001). A framework for managing maintenance using performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(1/2), 173-195.
  • Law, J., Bauin, S., Courtial, J., & Whittaker, J. (1988). Policy and the mapping of scientific change: A co-word analysis of research into environmental acidification. Scientometrics, 14(3-4), 251-264.
  • Li, C., Li, Q., Van Mieghem, P., Stanley, H. E., & Wang, H. (2015). Correlation between centrality metrics and their application to the opinion model. The European Physical Journal B, 88(3), 1-13.
  • Li, J. (2013). Continuous improvement at toyota manufacturing plant: applications of production systems engineering methods. International Journal of Production Research, 51(23- 24), 7235-7249.
  • Li, J., Papadopoulos, C. T., & Zhang, L. (2016). Continuous improvement in manufacturing and service systems. International Journal of Production Research, 54(21), 6281-6284.
  • Liker, J. K., & Morgan, J. M. (2006). The toyota way in services: the case of lean product development. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(2), 5-20.
  • Linderman, K., Schroeder, R. G., & Choo, A. S. (2006). Six sigma: the role of goals in improvement teams. Journal of Operations Management, 24(6), 779-790.
  • Linderman, K., Schroeder, R. G., Zaheer, S., & Choo, A. S. (2003). Six sigma: A goal-theoretic perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 21(2), 193-203.
  • MacCarthy, B. L., Lewis, M., Voss, C., & Narasimhan, R. (2013). The same old methodologies? perspectives on om research in the postlean age. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 33(7), 934-956.
  • Matthews, R. L., & Marzec, P. E. (2015). Continuous, quality and process improvement: disintegrating and reintegrating operational improvement? Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 28(3-4), 296-317.
  • McLean, R. S., Antony, J., & Dahlgaard, J. J. (2017). Failure of continuous improvement initiatives in manufacturing environments: a systematic review of the evidence. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 28(3-4), 219-237.
  • Meredith, J. R. (2001). Hopes for the future of operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 19(4), 397-402.
  • Munoz-Leiva, F., Viedmadel Jesus, M. I., Sanchez-Fernandez, J., & Lopez-Herrera, A. G. (2012). An application of co-word analysis and bibliometric maps for detecting the most highlighting themes in the consumer behaviour research from a longitudinal perspective. Quality & Quantity, 46(4), 1077-1095.
  • Nair, A., Malhotra, M. K., and Ahire, S. L. (2011). Toward a theory of managing context in six sigma process-improvement projects: An action research investigation. Journal of Operations Management, 29(5), 529-548.
  • Oliver, J. (2009). Continuous improvement: role of organisational learning mechanisms. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 26(6), 546-563.
  • Pande, P. S., Neuman, R. P., and Cavanagh, R. R. (2000). The six sigma way: How GE, Motorola, and other top companies are honing their performance. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Persson, O., Danell, R., and Schneider, J. W. (2009). How to use bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. Celebrating scholarly communication studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th Birthday, 5, 9-24.
  • Pilkington, A., & Meredith, J. (2009). The evolution of the intellectual structure of operations management1980–2006: A citation/co-citation analysis. Journal of Operations Management, 27(3), 185-202.
  • Poksinska, B., Swartling, D., & Drotz, E. (2013). The daily work of lean leaders– lessons from manufacturing and healthcare. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 24(7-8), 886–898.
  • Porteus, E. L. (1986). Optimal lot sizing, process quality improvement and setup cost reduction. Operations Research, 34(1), 137-144.
  • Prajogo, D. I., & Sohal, A. S. (2001). TQM and innovation: a literature review and research framework. Technovation, 21(9), 539-558.
  • Ritchie, W. J., & Melnyk, S. A. (2012). The impact of emerging institutional norms on adoption timing decisions: evidence from c-tpata government antiterrorism initiative. Strategic Management Journal, 33(7), 860-870.
  • Robinson, S., Radnor, Z. J., Burgess, N., & Worthington, C. (2012). Simlean: Utilising simulation in the implementation of lean in healthcare. European Journal of Operational Research, 219(1), 188-197.
  • Ronda-Pupo, G. A., & Guerras-Martin, L. A. (2012). Dynamics of the evolution of the strategy concept 1962–2008: a co-word analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 33(2), 162-188.
  • Sabet, E., Adams, E., &Yazdani, B. (2016). Quality management in heavy duty manufacturing industry: TQM vs. six sigma. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 27(1-2), 215-225.
  • Salton, G., & McGill, M. (1983). Introduction to modern information. Philadelphia, PA: American Association for Artificial Intelligence Retrieval.
  • Sanchez, L., & Blanco, B. (2014). Three decades of continuous improvement. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25(9-10), 986-1001.
  • Schroeder, R. G., Linderman, K., Liedtke, C., & Choo, A. S. (2008). Six sigma: Definition and underlying theory. Journal of Operations Management, 26(4), 536-554.
  • Shah, R., Chandrasekaran, A., & Linderman, K. (2008). In pursuit of implementation patterns: the context of lean and six sigma. International Journal of Production Research, 46(23), 6679-6699.
  • Singh, J., & Singh, H. (2012). Continuous improvement approach: state-of-art review and future implications. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 3(2), 88-111.
  • Snee, R. D. (2004). Six–sigma: the evolution of 100 years of business improvement methodology. International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage, 1(1), 4-20.
  • Sousa, S., & Aspinwall, E. (2010). Development of a performance measurement framework for smes. Total Quality Management, 21(5), 475-501.
  • Sprague, L. G. (2007). Evolution of the field of operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 219–238.
  • Terlaak, A., & Gong, Y. (2008). Vicarious learning and inferential accuracy in adoption processes. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 846–868.
  • Thawesaengskulthai, N., & Tannock, J. (2008). Fashion setting in quality management and continuous improvement. International Studies of Management & Organization, 38(2), 5-24.
  • Wang, Z., Zhao, H.,& Wang, Y. (2015). Social networks in marketing research 2001–2014: a co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 105(1), 65-82.
  • Wehmuth, K., & Ziviani, A. (2012). Distributed assessment of the closeness centrality ranking in complex networks. In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Workshop on Simplifying Complex Networks for Practitioners, pages 43-48. New York, NY: Association of Computing Machinery (ACM).
  • Yang, Y., Wu, M.,& Cui, L. (2011). Integration of three visualization methods based on co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 90(2), 659-673.
  • Yusof, S. M., & Aspinwall, E. (2000). TQM implementation issues: review and case study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(6), 634-655.
  • Zu, X., Fredendall, L. D., & Douglas, T. J. (2008). The evolving theory of quality management: the role of six sigma. Journal of Operations Management, 26(5), 630-650.

Abstract Views: 134

PDF Views: 1




  • Evolution of Operational Improvement in Management Science/Operations Research (2000-2016):A Social Network Co-Word Analysis

Abstract Views: 134  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Feng Dong
Doctoral Student, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhongguancun Road East 80, Haidian District, Beijing, China
Zongshui Wang
Associate Professor, School of Economics and Management, Beijing Information Science and Technology University, Beijing, China
Qiguo Gong
Professor, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhongguancun Road East 80, Haidian District, Beijing, China

Abstract


This paper elucidates the process of evolution of Operational Improvement (OI) by a coword analysis based on data downloaded from the database of Web of Science. Our research reveals that the published papers indicate an overall growth trend during the selected 17 years and have a rapid increasing between 2002 and 2008 but hold a relatively stable growth in recent years. “Quality management” and “Lean and six sigma management” are direct and core themes of OI in most research phases since they appeared. Lean and six sigma management especially locates itself in the most critical position in the research field of OI in Management Science/Operations Research (MS/OR). Research methods, optimization algorithm and decision analysis provide support for the research of OI in most stages. In recent years, some peripheral research topics also appear as emerging topics in the research of OI which need pay more attention in future, such as service and CRM, healthcare services and risk and safety management. The operations improvement will have an immeasurable effect on the service and healthcare field. Network characteristic indexes indicate that the overall tightness of the keywords show a gradual declining trend with the timespan ongoing, the research themes’ dispersion of the second and third stage research points to some extent and keywords in the first and second stages has the higher degree of contact with the adjacent keywords.

Keywords


Co-Word Analysis, Continuous improvement, Lean and Six Sigma, Operational Improvement, Process Improvement, Quality Improvement, Social Network Analysis.

References