Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management)

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Faceted Classification as a General Theory for Knowledge Organization


Affiliations
1 University College London, United Kingdom
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The Classification Research Group manifesto of 1955, 'Faceted classification as the basis of all information retrieval', has been at least in part achieved, and there is much evidence of faceted classification influencing a whole range of modern information retrieval tools. This paper examines the theory underlying faceted classification, how and why it has been taken up so widely, and what benefits it brings to the activity of knowledge organization. The role of facet analysis as a general research tool is also considered, and how it compares with other content analysis tools as a means of modelling subject domains.

Keywords

Faceted Classification, Facet Analysis, Categories, Knowledge Organization.
User
About The Author

Vanda Broughton
University College London
United Kingdom


Notifications

  • Adkisson, H.P. (2005) Web design practices: use of faceted classification. Retrieved from www.webdesignpractices.com/navigation/facets.html

  • Agostini, Alessandro; Devika P. Madalli and A.R.D. Prasad. (2011) Faceted Approach To Diverse Query Processing. DiversiWeb 2011. 17. (Accessed at http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-762/ paper4.pdf)

  • Agostini, Alessandro; Devika P. Madalli and A.R.D. Prasad. (2011) Facet-based opinion retrieval from blogs. Information Processing and Management, 46(1): 71-88.

  • Aitchison Jean. (1986) A classification as a source for a thesaurus: The Bibliographic Classification of H. E. Bliss as a source of thesaurus terms and structure. Journal of documentation, 42(3): 160-181.

  • Aitchison,J.; Gomershall, I. and Ireland, R. (1969) Thesaurofacet: a thesaurus and faceted classification for engineering and related subjects. Whetstone, Leicester : English Electric Company (Book).

  • Andrews, D.D. and Newman, S.M. (1956) Storage and retrieval of contents of technical literature, non-chemical information, 15 May 1956, US Patent Office, Research and Development Report (Report)

  • Austin Derek. (1984) PRECIS: a manual of concept analysis and subject indexing 2nd ed. London: The British Library Bibliographic Services Division (Book).

  • Austin, D. (1969) Prospects for a new general classification. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 1: 149-169,

  • Bliss, H.E. (1940/1953) A bibliographic classification, extended by systematic auxiliary schedules for composite specification and notation, New York: Wilson (Book)

  • Broughton, V. (2008) A faceted classification as the basis of a faceted terminology: conversion of a classified structure to thesaurus format in the Bliss Bibliographic Classification, 2nd Edition.” Axiomathes, 18(2): 193-210

  • Broughton, V. (2006) The need for faceted classification as the basis of all information retrieval. Aslib Proceedings 58(2): 49-72

  • BS 8723-2. (2005) Structured vocabularies for information retrieval. Part 2: Thesauri. 2005, London: British Standards Institution (Book).

  • Checkland, P.B. (1981) Systems thinking, systems practice. Wiley, Chichester (Book).

  • Checkland, P.B. (1989) Soft systems methodology. Human systems management, 8(4): 273-289.

  • Classification Research Group. (1955) The need for a faceted classification as the basis for all methods of information retrieval. Library Association Record, 57(7): 262-268.

  • Classification Research Group. (1964) Some problems of a general classification scheme. Report of a conference held in London June 1963, London (Book)

  • de Grolier, E.A. (1962) Study of general categories applicable to classification and coding in documentation, Paris: Unesco (Book), p.15

  • Digard, F. et al. (1975) Répertoireanalytique des cylindresorientauxpubliésdans les sources bibliographiqueséparses (3 vols.). Editions du Centre National de la RechercheScientifique, Paris (Book).

  • Farradane, J.E.L. (1950) A scientific theory of classification and indexing. Journal of Documentation, 6: 83-99.

  • For example the Hotter Shoe website: http://www.hottershoes.com/en/info/Women

  • Foskett, D.J. (1958) The construction of a faceted classification. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific Information, 1959 Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences (Conference proceedings) 53-74.

  • Foskett, D.J. (1970) Classification for a general index language: a review of recent research by the Classification Research Group. London: Library Association (Book), p.39.

  • Foskett, D.J. (1971) The Classification Research Group 1952-1968. In Kent, A. & Lancour, H. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of library and information Science, 5: 141-145. New York: Marcel Dekker (Book).

  • Gardin, J.C. On the coding of geometrical shapes and other representations with reference to archaeological documents. ICSI E: 889-901

  • Gardin, J.C. (1958) Four codes for the description of artefacts. American anthropologist, 60(2): 335-7.

  • Gardin, J.C.; Chevalier, J.; Christophe, J. and Salomé, M.R. (1976) Code pour l’analyse des formes de poteries. CNRS, Paris (Book).

  • Harry, B.; Sturges, K.M. and Klingner, J.K. (2005) Mapping the process: an exemplar of process and challenge in grounded theory analysis. Educational researcher, 34(2): 3-13.

  • Hjørland, B. (2013) Facet analysis: the logical approach to knowledge organization. Information Processing and Management, 49(2): 545-557.

  • Holstrom, J.E. (1951) Facts, files and action in business and public affairs. Vol. 2, London: Chapman & Hall (Book) p.70-83.

  • Kaiser, J. (1911) Systematic indexing, London: Pitman (Book)

  • La Barre, K. (2006) The use of faceted analytico-synthetic theory in the practice of website construction and design. Unpublished dissertation. Indiana University. Retrieved from https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/klabarre/www/LaBarre_FAST.pdf

  • Lofland, J.; Snow, D.; Anderson, L. and Lofland, L.H. (2006) Analyzing social settings: a guide to qualitative observation and analysis (4th ed.), Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth (Book).

  • M. Breeding. (2007) Next generation library catalogs, Library technology reports, 43(4): 5-14.

  • Manuel du Repertoire BibliographiqueUniversel, Brussels: IIB, 1905-1907 (Book)

  • McIlwaine, I.C. and Williamson, N.J. (1994) A feasibility study on the restructuring of the Universal Decimal Classification into a full-faceted classification system. In Albrechtsen, H &Oernager, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO) Conference: Knowledge organization and quality management, Copenhagen, Denmark, 20-24 Jun 94 (Advances in Knowledge Organization Vol. 4, pp. 406-13) 1994Frankfurt/Main: INDEKS. (Conference proceedings)

  • Mercun, T. and Zumer, M. (2008) New generation of catalogues for the new generation of users: A comparison of six library catalogues. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 42(3): 243-261.

  • Merholz, Peter Innovation in classification. 23.09.2001 www.peterme.com/archives/ 00000063.html

  • Mills J. and Broughton, V. (1977) Bliss bibliographic classification, 2nd ed., London: Butterworth (later Munich: Bowker Saur; Saur) (Book) p.40.

  • Mills, J. (2004) Faceted classification and logical division in information retrieval.” Library Trends, 52(3): 541-70

  • Oxford English Dictionary. http://www.oed.com.

  • Pagès, Robert. Introduction à l’analysecodée: une technique documentaire en psychologiesociale et sciences humaines, Recherchessociologiques, 1955, (2): 55-66; 1956(3) 65-76.

  • Perry, J.W.; Kent, A. and Berry, M.M. (1956) Machine literature searching, Interscience: New York (Book).

  • Pollitt, A.S.; M.P. Smith and P. Braekevelt. (1996) View-based searching systems: a new paradigm for information retrieval based on faceted classification and indexing using mutually constraining knowledge-based rules. In C. Johnson & M. Dunlop (Eds.), Information retrieval and human computer interaction (Proceedings of the joint workshop of the information retrieval and human computer interaction specialist groups of the British Computer Society) GIST Technical Report G96-2, Glasgow University. Glasgow: Glasgow University, 73-77 (Conference proceedings)

  • Prieto-Diaz, R. A faceted approach to building ontologies. Submitted to the 21st International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, Tampere, Finland, October 7-11, 2002 Retrieved from https://users.cs.jmu.edu/prietorx/public/RubenPubs%5B1%5D.html (Conference proceedings)

  • Proceedings of the International Study Conference on Classification for Information Retrieval. (1958) Held at Beatrice Webb House, Dorking, England, 13th-17th May 1957. London: Aslib (Conference proceedings), p.115

  • Proceedings of the International Study. (1958) Conference on Classification for Information Retrieval held at Beatrice, Webb House, Dorking, England, 13th-17th May 1957. London: Aslib (Conference proceedings).

  • Ranganathan, S.R. (1960) Colon classification: Basic classification (6th ed.). London: Asia Publishing House.

  • Ranganathan, S.R. (1967) Prolegomena to library classification 3rd edition. (Ranganathan Series in Library Science, 20). London: Asia Publishing House (Book), 399f.

  • Ranganathan, S.R. (1950) Classification, coding and machinery for search. Paris, France: Unesco (Book).

  • Rodriguez-Castro, B.; Glaser, H. and Carr, L. How to reuse a faceted classification and put it on the semantic web. In: The 9th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), November 2010, Shanghai, China (Conference proceedings)

  • Saladana, J. (2013) The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage(Book), p.6

  • Search results from Library and information science abstracts (Database). http://www. proquest.com/en-US/catalogs/databases/detail/lisa-set-c.shtml

  • Slavic, A. (2009) The Round Table: ‘UDC editorial perspectives’ a report. Extensions and corrections to the UDC, 31: 19

  • Spiteri, L. (1995) The Classification Research Group and the theory of integrative levels. Katharine Sharp Review, 1.

  • Spiteri, L.F. (1997) The use of facet analysis in information retrieval thesauri: an examination of selected guidelines for thesaurus construction. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 25(1): 21-39.

  • Spiteri, Louise. (1998) A simplified model for facet analysis. Canadian journal of library and information science 23: 1-30 (April-July)

  • Star, Susan Leigh. (1998) Grounded classification: grounded theory and faceted classification. Library trends, 47(2): 218-232.

  • Text encoding initiative. http://www.tei-c.org/index.xml

  • Tzitzakas Y. et al. (2004) An algebraic approach for specifying compound terms in faceted taxonomies. InInformation Modelling and Knowledge Bases XV, Proceedings of EJC’03 67–87. IOS Press (Conference proceedings)

  • Vickery, B. C. (1959) Subject analysis for information retrieval. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific Information, 1958, Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences (Conference proceedings) p. 41-52

  • Vickery, B.C. (1953) Systematic subject indexing. Journal of Documentation, 9(1): 48-57.

  • Vickery, B.C. (2008) Faceted classification for the web. Axiomathes, 18(2): 145-160. DOI:10.1007/s10516-007-9025-9

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. (1953) Philosophical Investigations, Oxford: Blackwell, p30.


Abstract Views: 912

PDF Views: 9




  • Faceted Classification as a General Theory for Knowledge Organization

Abstract Views: 912  |  PDF Views: 9

Authors

Vanda Broughton
University College London, United Kingdom

Abstract


The Classification Research Group manifesto of 1955, 'Faceted classification as the basis of all information retrieval', has been at least in part achieved, and there is much evidence of faceted classification influencing a whole range of modern information retrieval tools. This paper examines the theory underlying faceted classification, how and why it has been taken up so widely, and what benefits it brings to the activity of knowledge organization. The role of facet analysis as a general research tool is also considered, and how it compares with other content analysis tools as a means of modelling subject domains.

Keywords


Faceted Classification, Facet Analysis, Categories, Knowledge Organization.

References