Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Das, Amit Kumar
- Application of Bloom’s Taxonomy in Library and Information Science : An Assessment
Abstract Views :170 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Affiliations
1 Bhatter College, Dantan, Paschim Medinipur − 721426, West Bengal, IN
2 Depatment of Library and Information Science, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore − 721102, West Bengal, IN
1 Bhatter College, Dantan, Paschim Medinipur − 721426, West Bengal, IN
2 Depatment of Library and Information Science, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore − 721102, West Bengal, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 59, No 3 (2022), Pagination: 171-175Abstract
Abstract Bloom’s Taxonomy has been used as a tool to develop sound teaching-learning processes in many fields; however, there has been very little on the application of the taxonomy in Library and Information Science. This paper outlines how the evaluation process could be more logical and scientific to ensure the necessary skills, which are necessary for day to day work of library professionals. Based on different levels of Bloom's Taxanomy a few sample questions are given.Keywords
Bloom’s Taxonomy, Library and Information Science Assessment, Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy.
References
- Anderson, L. and Krathwohl, D. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New International ed. Pearson.
- Barr, A., Bechdolt, B., Coxe, W., Gage, N., Orleans, J., Remmers, H. and Ryans, D. (1952). Report of the committee on the criteria of teacher effectiveness. Review of Educational Research, 22(3), 238-263. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1168575?seq=1, https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543022003238.
- Bloom, B. S. (1954). The thought Process of Students in Discussion. In: Accent on Teaching; Experiments in General Education. 1st ed. New York: Harper & Bros.
- Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Book I Cognitive Domain. 2nd ed. New York: Longman.
- Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H. and Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company, 207p.
- Dave, R. H. (1975). Developing and Writing Behavioral Objectives. Arizona: Educational Innovators Press. 63p.
- Flannery, M. C. (2007). Observations on biology. The American Biology Teacher, 69(9), 561-564. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232673653_Observations_.on_Biology, https://doi.org/10.2307/4452226.
- Harrow, A. J. (1972). A Taxonomy of the Psychomotor Domain: A Guide for Developing Behavioral Objectives. New York: David McKay Company.
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloom%27s_taxonomy.
- Jakobovits, L. A. and Nahl-Jakobovits, D. (1987). Learning the Library: Taxonomy of skills and errors. College and Research Library, 48(3), 203-214. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/41058/crl_48_03_203_opt.pdf?sequence=2, https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_48_03_203.
- Jansen, B.J., Booth, D. and Smith, B. (2009). Using the taxonomy of cognitive learning to model online searching. Information Processing and Management, 45(6), 643-663. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S030645730900051X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2009.05.004.
- Khairuddin, N. N. and Hashim, K. (2008). Application of Bloom’s Taxonomy in Software Engineering Assessments. Proceedings of the 8th WSEAS International Conference on Applied Computer Science (ACS’08). p. 66-69. http://wseas.us/e-library/conferences/2008/venice/acs/acs09.pdf.
- Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice Routledge, 41(4), 212-218. https://www.depauw.edu/files/resources/krathwohl.pdf, https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2.
- Manaris, B. and McCauley, R. (2004). Incorporating HCI into the Undergraduate Curriculum: Bloom’s Taxonomy Meets the CC’01 Curricular Guidelines. 34
th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. T2H/10 - T2H/15. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/4130771_Incorporating_HCI_into_the_undergraduate_curriculum_Bloom’s_taxonomy_meets_the_CC’01_curricular_guidelines. - Morshead, R. W. (1965). On Taxonomy of educational objectives Handbook II: Affective domain. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 4(1), 164-170. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/43808/11217_2004_Article_BF00373956.pdf?sequence=1, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00373956.
- Nahl, D. (2008). Information Counseling inventory of affective and cognitive reactions while learning the Internet. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 2(2-3), 11-33. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J136v02n02_04, https://doi.org/10.1300/J136v02n02_04.
- Nahl-Jakobovits, D. and Jakobovits, L. A. (1993). Bibliographic instructional design for information literacy: Integrating affective and cognitive objectives. Research Strategies, 11(2), 73-88. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ469196.
- Paul, R. W. (1993). Critical Thinking: What every Person Needs to Survive in a Rapidly Changing World. 3rd ed. Rohnert Park, California: Sonoma State University Press. p. 572.
- Simpson, E. J. (1966). The classification of educational objectives: Psychomotor domain. Illinois Journal of Home Economics, 10(4), 110-144. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED010368.
- Yadin, A. (2007). Implementation of Bloom’s Taxonomy on Systems Analysis Workshops, Proceedings of the AIS SIG-ED IAIM 2007 Conference. https://www.researchgate. net/publication/228372937_Implementation_of_Bloom’s_Taxonomy_on_Systems_Analysis_Workshops.