Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Rajendiran, P.
- Identification of Important E-Journals from Article(S) Sought by the Users:An Analysis of Access Denied Usage Report
Abstract Views :289 |
PDF Views:10
Authors
Affiliations
1 Scientific Information Resource Centre (SIRC), Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology, Post RRCAT, Indore – 452013, IN
1 Scientific Information Resource Centre (SIRC), Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology, Post RRCAT, Indore – 452013, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 55, No 3 (2018), Pagination: 162-168Abstract
Counting Online Usage of Networked Electronic Resources (COUNTER), JR2 (Journal Report 2) - access denied to fulltext articles by month, journal, and category; for the year 2016 and 2017 studied. This paper tries to identify what other e-journal sources apart from current licensed one, that the users looked online to meet day-to-day information requirements. The JR2 usage data downloaded from 13 e-journals platform / content provider for the purpose and analyzed data. This analysis found most frequently paper(s) sought e-journals, year, platform, and publisher wise number of access denied papers during the year 2016 and 2017. It also explored number of e-journals from which at least a full text document tried to download. Bradford’s law of scattering applied to find core journals and found 23 e-journals based on JR2 access denied usage data. The study feels that like other methods and techniques employed by library and information professionals, the JR2 usage data analysis also an important tool to identify the best out of the best resources and help to bridge the gap in serials collection.Keywords
Download Pattern, E-Resources Usage Pattern, JR2, E-Journals Access Denied, Usage Statistics.
References
- Bradford, S. C. (1948). Documentation. London: Crosby Lockwood.
- Bradford, S. C. (1934). Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering, 137(3550), 85–86.
- COUNTER. (2012). COUNTER code of practice, release 4. Retrieved from: https://www.projectcounter.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/COPR4.pdf.
- Davis, P. M., & Solla, L. R. (2003). An IP-level analysis of usage statistics for electronic journals in chemistry: Making inferences about user behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(11), 1062–1068. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10302.
- Emrani, E., Moradi-Salari, A., & Jamali, H. R. (2010). Usage Data, E-journal Selection, and Negotiations: An Iranian Consortium Experience. Serials Review, 36(2), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2010.10765289.
- Larivière, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P. (2015). The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era.PloS One, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502.
- Rathemacher, A. (2010). E-Journal Usage Statistics in Collection Management Decisions: A Literature Review. In: Darby Orcutt (Ed.), Library Data: Empowering Practice and Persuasion (pp.71–89).
- Singh, Y. (2016). E-Journal usage analysis in an Academic Library: A case study of a publisher at a technology institute. SRELS Journal of Information Management, 53(3), 171–175. https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2016/ v53i3/75067.
- Srivastava, B., & Kumar, S. (2018). Usage and impact of science direct material science package in a material science library - Google search. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 38(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.38.1.12124.
- Tucker, C. (2009). Benchmarking usage statistics in collection management decisions for serials. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 21(1), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/19411260902858581.
- Van Noorden, R. (2015). Nature owner merges with publishing giant. Nature News, https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature.2015.16731.