Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Study of Existing Risk Management Models and Prior Research Contribution


Affiliations
1 Dept. of Computer Science, Dr. Ambedkar Institute of Technology, Bangalore, India
2 Research and Development Centre, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, India
 

Different software projects development methodologies exist in current era, however, selecting the methodology that most closely fits a computer code depends on many factors. One necessary issue is the extents of how much risky the project is. Another issue is that the degree to that every methodology supports risk management. Indeed, the literature is wealthy in such studies that aim at scrutiny the presently out there computer code development method models from totally different views. In distinction, very little effort has been spent in purpose of scrutiny the out there method models in terms of its support to risk management. During the discussion, we tend to investigate the state of risk and risk management within the most well-liked computer code development method models (i.e. waterfall, vmodel, progressive development, spiral, and agile development). This trend in such studies is anticipated to serve in many aspects. Technically, it helps project managers adopt the methodology that most accurately fits their projects. From another facet, it'll build the simplest way for additional studies that aim at up the computer code development method.

Keywords

Component, Software Engineering, Risk Management.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • The Standish Group, “Report CHAOS”, Project Smart, 2014
  • “The Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)”, Pilican Engineering, Dcoument ID-0-2, Version 2.0
  • Jones and Bartlett “Software Process Models”, LLC, 2004
  • H.Hijazi, T.Khdour, A.Alarabeyyat, “A Review of Risk Management in Different Software Development Methodologies”, International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887) Volume 45– No.7, May 2012
  • W. Royce, “Managing the development of large software systems,” IEEE WESCON, pp. 1-9,, 1970
  • R. Flask “The System Life Cycle”, Charlie Abela
  • “Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)”, Tuorial Points
  • B.W. Boehm, "A spiral model of software development and enhancement." Computer 21, no. 5, pp. 61-72, 1988
  • “NASA Risk Management Handbook” NASA/SP-2011-3422 Version 1.0, 2011
  • “An Introduction to Agile Software Development”, Serena, 2007
  • Jakub Miler “A Method of Software Project Risk Identification and Analysis”, Gdańsk University of Technology, 2005
  • Schmietendorf, Andreas, André Scholz, and Claus Rautenstrauch. "Evaluating the performance engineering process." Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Software and performance, ACM, 2000
  • Wallmüller, E. "Risk management for IT and software projects." In Business continuity, pp. 165-178. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2002
  • M.HALIMA and A.Zahary. "A Framework For Software Product Risk Management Based On Quality Attributes And Operational Life Cycle (SPRMQ)." Risk 1(3), 2010
  • L. Sarigiannidis and P. D. Chatzoglou. "Software development project risk management:A new conceptual framework." Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, Vol.4, No. 05, 293, 2011
  • N.J.Kipyegen, W.Mwangi, and S. t.Kimani. "Risk Management Adoption Framework for Software Projects: A Case Study for Kenyan Software Project Managers and Developers." International Journal of Computer Science Issues (IJCSI), Vol.9, No. 3, 2012
  • A. Elzamly and B. Hussin. " AN Enhancement of Framework Software Risk Management Methodology for Successful Software Development" Journal of Theoretical & Applied Information Technology, Vol. 62, No. 2,2014
  • R. Conforti, M. L. Rosa, A. H. M. T. Hofstede, G.Fortino, M.D.Leoni and M.J. Adams. "A software framework for risk-aware business process management." In Proceedings of the CAiSE'13 Forum at the 25th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE): CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 998, pp. 130-137. Sun SITE Central Europe, 2013.
  • P. L. Bannerman" Risk and risk management in software projects: A reassessment." Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 81, No. 12, pp.2118-2133, 2008
  • G.G.Roy"A risk management framework for software engineering practice." In Software Engineering Conference, 2004. Proceedings. 2004 Australian, pp. 60-67, 2004
  • A. K. Ali, A. Ali, and S.Riddle. "Risk management for web and distributed software development projects." In Internet Monitoring and Protection (ICIMP), 2010 Fifth International Conference, pp. 22-28, 2010
  • Efficient Framework of e-Government for Mining Knowledge from Massive Grievance Redressal Data, G Sangeetha, LM Rao- International Journal of Advanced Research in Communication Engineering,2015
  • ‘Branding Strategy-Delivering the brand promise in a competitive environment’ GJ-MIT, Mohali, India

Abstract Views: 352

PDF Views: 228




  • Study of Existing Risk Management Models and Prior Research Contribution

Abstract Views: 352  |  PDF Views: 228

Authors

L. Manjunath Rao
Dept. of Computer Science, Dr. Ambedkar Institute of Technology, Bangalore, India
Salma Firdose
Research and Development Centre, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, India

Abstract


Different software projects development methodologies exist in current era, however, selecting the methodology that most closely fits a computer code depends on many factors. One necessary issue is the extents of how much risky the project is. Another issue is that the degree to that every methodology supports risk management. Indeed, the literature is wealthy in such studies that aim at scrutiny the presently out there computer code development method models from totally different views. In distinction, very little effort has been spent in purpose of scrutiny the out there method models in terms of its support to risk management. During the discussion, we tend to investigate the state of risk and risk management within the most well-liked computer code development method models (i.e. waterfall, vmodel, progressive development, spiral, and agile development). This trend in such studies is anticipated to serve in many aspects. Technically, it helps project managers adopt the methodology that most accurately fits their projects. From another facet, it'll build the simplest way for additional studies that aim at up the computer code development method.

Keywords


Component, Software Engineering, Risk Management.

References