Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Influence of Customer's Brand Attitude on Purchase Intention of Private Label Fashion Brands


Affiliations
1 Rajagiri School of Management, Rajagiri Centre for Business Studies, Cochin, Kerala, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Private Label Brands have been steadily increasing their presence and dominance in the retail industry. Customers are slowly changing their attitude to Private labels. As competition is becoming stiffer, retailors are strategizing in increasing their own brands. Retailers have introduced varieties of private labels in different categories like apparel, food and grocery, health care, personal care, consumer durables, lifestyle etc. This study was being conducted in private label brands of fashion industry. The research aimed to investigate the role of private label brand attitude on purchase intention of fashion brands. The research was conducted to understand the consumer factors that leads to private label brand attitude. The study was conducted among consumers of private labels in and around Kochi city. The study results corroborated that Price Consciousness has a direct positive relation with Purchase Intention of fashion brands. It was also established that Consumer Innovativeness has a positive and direct relation with Purchase Intention. It was accepted that Consumer Innovativeness has a positive effect on Private Label Brand Attitude. The study revealed that Private Label Brand Attitude has a mediating effect on Purchase Intention of fashion brands.


Keywords

Private Label Brand Attitude, Purchase Intention, Price Quality Association, Consumer Innovativeness, Smart Shopper Self Perception.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Boone, Louis E., & Kurtz, David, L. (1995). Contemporary marketing, Fort Worth, TX: Dryden.
  • Burton S., Netemeyer R.G., & Lichtenstein D.R. (1995, Spring). Gender differences for appearance- rated attitudes and behaviors: Implications for consumer welfare. Journal of Public Policy Marketing, 14, 60 – 75.
  • Burton, S., Lichtenstein, D.R., Netemeyer, R.G., & Garretson, J.A. (1998). A scale for measuring attitude toward private label products and an examination of its psychological and behavioral correlates. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26 (4), 293-306.
  • Jin, Byoungho., & Suh, Yong Gu (2005). Integrating effect of consumer perception factors in predicting private brand purchase in a Korean discount store context. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22/2, 62–71.
  • Erickson, Gary M., & Johansson Johny K. (1985, September). The role of price in multi-attribute product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 195-199.
  • Garretson, J.A., Fisher, D., & Burton, S. (2002). Antecedents of private label attitude and national brand promotion attitude: Similarities and differences. Journal of Retailing, 78, 91-99.
  • Herstein, R., & Gamliel, E. (2006a). Striking a balance with private branding. Business Strategy Review, 17(3), 37-41.
  • Herstein, R., & Gamliel, E. (2004). An investigation of private branding as a global phenomenon. Journal of Euro Marketing, 13(4), 59-77.
  • Hoch, S.J. (1996). How should national brands think about private labels?. Sloan Management Review, 37 (2), 89-102.
  • Hoch, S.J., & Banerji, S. (1993). When do private labels succeed?, Sloan Management Review, 34 (4), 57 – 67.
  • Leavitt, C., & Walton, J. R. (1975). Development of a scale for innovativeness. Advances in Consumer Research, 2(1), 545-554.
  • Leavitt, C., & Walton. J. R. (1988). Openness of information processing as a moderator of message effects on behaviour, College of Business Administration, Ohio State University.
  • Lichtenstein, Donald R., Ridgway, Nancy M., & Netemeyer, Richard G. (1993, May). Price perception and consumer shopping; A field study. Journal of Marketing Research. 30 (2), 234-245.
  • Lichtenstein, Donald R., Bloch Peter H., & Black, William C. (1988, September). Correlates of price acceptability. Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (2), 243–252.
  • Lichtenstein, Netemeyer, Richard G., & Burton, Scot (1990). Distinguishing, coupon proneness from value consciousness: An acquisition - Transaction utility theory perspective. Journal of Marketing, 54 (06), 54-67.
  • Mano, H., & Elliott, M. T. (1997). Smart shopping: The origins and consequences of price savings. Paper presented at the Advances in Consumer Research, Provo, UT.
  • Mitchell, Andrew A., & Jerry C. Olson (1981). Are product beliefs the only mediator of advertising effect on brand attitude? Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (08), 318-332.
  • Monroe, K.B., & Krishnan, R. (1985).The effect of price on subjective product evaluations In NA - Advances in Consumer Research, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 12(1), 85-90.
  • Monroe, Kent B., & Susan M. Petroshius (1981). Buyers' perceptions of price: An update of the evidence. In Harold H. Kassarjian & Thomas S. Robertson, (Eds.), Perspectives in consumer behavior, 3rd Edition, (pp 43-55), Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman, and Company.
  • Richardson, P.S., Jain, A.K., & Dick, A. (1996). Household store brand proneness: A framework. Journal of Retailing, 72(2), 159-85.
  • Rogers, E.M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations, 3rd edition, New York:. The Free Press.
  • Shaoa, Chris Y., Baker, Julie., & Wagner, Judy A. (2004). The effects of appropriateness of service contact personnel dress on customer expectations of service quality and purchase intention: The moderating influences of involvement and gender. Journal of Business Research, 57, 1164– 1176.
  • Sinha I., & Batra R. (1999).The effect of consumer price consciousness on private label purchase. International Journal of Research in Marketing 16(3), 237-251.
  • Schindler, R.M. (1992). A coupon is more than a low price: Evidence from a shopping-simulation study. Psychology & Marketing, 9(6), 431-51.
  • Spears, Nancy., & Singh, Surendra N. (2004). Measuring attitude toward the brand and purchase intentions, Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 26 (2), 53-66.
  • Steenkamp, J.B.E.M., Ter Hofstede, F., & Wedel, M. (1999). A cross-national investigation into the individual and national cultural antecedents of consumer innovativeness. Journal of Marketing, 63(2), 55-69.
  • Wua, Paul C.S., Yuh, Gary Yeong., & Yeh, Hsiao, Chieh-Ru (2011). The effect of store image and service quality on brand image and purchase intention, for private label brands. Australasian Marketing Journal, 19, 30–39.

Abstract Views: 359

PDF Views: 1




  • Influence of Customer's Brand Attitude on Purchase Intention of Private Label Fashion Brands

Abstract Views: 359  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Balakrishnan Menon
Rajagiri School of Management, Rajagiri Centre for Business Studies, Cochin, Kerala, India

Abstract


Private Label Brands have been steadily increasing their presence and dominance in the retail industry. Customers are slowly changing their attitude to Private labels. As competition is becoming stiffer, retailors are strategizing in increasing their own brands. Retailers have introduced varieties of private labels in different categories like apparel, food and grocery, health care, personal care, consumer durables, lifestyle etc. This study was being conducted in private label brands of fashion industry. The research aimed to investigate the role of private label brand attitude on purchase intention of fashion brands. The research was conducted to understand the consumer factors that leads to private label brand attitude. The study was conducted among consumers of private labels in and around Kochi city. The study results corroborated that Price Consciousness has a direct positive relation with Purchase Intention of fashion brands. It was also established that Consumer Innovativeness has a positive and direct relation with Purchase Intention. It was accepted that Consumer Innovativeness has a positive effect on Private Label Brand Attitude. The study revealed that Private Label Brand Attitude has a mediating effect on Purchase Intention of fashion brands.


Keywords


Private Label Brand Attitude, Purchase Intention, Price Quality Association, Consumer Innovativeness, Smart Shopper Self Perception.

References