Abhigyan

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Risk Perception of Mutual Fund Investors


Affiliations
1 School of Business Studies, Islamic University of Science and Technology, Jammu and Kashmir, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Every investor likes return and dislikes risk, but risk is deeply ischolar_mained in all financial markets. A positive relationship persists between risk and return. Mostly investors are risk averse, which means that if everything else is the same, they will select the investment that offers greater certainty. The main objective of this study is to reveal the risk perception of Mutual Fund Investors of Jammu and Kashmir, as risk perception of individual investors usually affects their investment decision. The study considers some of the important factors for understanding the risk perception of individual/retail mutual fund investors of Jammu and Kashmir. For measuring the respondents’ perceptions, the study employs the Likert scale technique. The study employs the Factor Analysis technique to identify the underlying dimensions or factors that explain the correlations among a set of variables regarding the risk perception of mutual fund investors.

Keywords

Mutual Fund Investors, Risk Perception, Factor Analysis, Risk Averse, Market Risk.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Barber, B. M., Odean, T., & Zheng, L. (2004). The behavior of mutual fund investors. Working Paper, University of California, Davis, CA.

  • Bartlett, J.E., Kotrlik, J.W., & Higgins, C.C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19 (1), 43-50.

  • Binmore, K. (2008). Game theory: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Capon, N., Fitzsimons, G. J., & Prince, R. A. (1996). An individual level analysis of the mutual fund investment decision. Journal of Financial Services Research, 10 (1), 59-82.

  • Deb, S. G., Banerjee, A., & Chakrabarti, B. B. (2007). Market timing and stock selection ability of mutual funds in India: An empirical investigation. Vikalpa, 32 (2), 39.

  • Fredman, A.J. (1996). Wrestling with risk: A multi headed concept with no single measure. Associates of America Individual Investors, 25-30. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2234.

  • Grable, J.E. (2000). Financial risk tolerance and additional factors that affect risk taking in everyday money matters. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14, 625-630.

  • Grable, J. E., & Lytton, R. H. (1999b). Assessing financial risk tolerance: Do demographic, socioeconomic, and attitudinal factors work. Family Relations and Human Development/Family Economics and Resource Management Biennial, 3, 80-88.

  • Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Andersen, R.E., & Tatham, R.L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  • Hallahan, T. A., Faff, R. W., & McKenzie, M. D. (2004). An empirical investigation of personal financial risk tolerance. Financial Services Review-Greenwich, 13 (1), 57-78.

  • Hunter, K., & Kemp, S. (2004). The personality of e-commerce investors. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25(4), 529-537.

  • Ippolito, R. A. (1992). Consumer reaction to measures of poor quality: Evidence from the mutual fund industry. Journal of Law and Economics, 35(1), 45-70.

  • Lo, A., Repniz, D., & Steenbargery, B. (2005). Fear and greed in financial markets: A clinical study of day-traders. MIT Sloan School of Management, Working Paper 4534-4605.

  • Malhotra, N.K., & Dash, S. (2014). Marketing research: An applied orientation. New Delhi: Pearson Education, Inc.

  • Miller, C.D. (1991). Handbook of research design and social measurement. Newbury Park, California: Sage publications.

  • Mittal, M., & Vyas R.K. (2008). Personality type and Investment Choice: An empirical study. ICFAI, University Journal of Behavioural Finance, 5(3), 7-22.

  • Ramasamy, B., & Yeung, M. C. (2003). Evaluating mutual funds in an emerging market: Factors that matter to financial advisors. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 21(3), 122-136.

  • Roszkowski, M. J., Snelbecker, G. E., & Leimberg, S. R. (1993). Risk tolerance and risk aversion. The Tools and Techniques of Financial Planning, 4, 213-225.

  • Saini, S., Anjum, D. B., & Saini, R. (2011). Investors’ awareness and perception about mutual funds. Journal of Banking Financial Services and Insurance Research, 1(1), 92-107.

  • Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2010). Research methods for business: A skill building approaches (5th ed.), Chichester: John Willey & Sons Ltd.

  • Wilcox, R. T. (2003). Bargain hunting or star gazing? Investors’ preferences for stock Mutual Funds. The Journal of Business, 76 (4), 645-663.

  • Young, S., Gudjonsson, G., Carter, P., Terry, R., & Morris, R. (2012). Simulation and risk-taking and its relationship with personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 53 (3), 294-299.

  • Zainudin, H.A. (2010). Research Methodology for Business and Social Sciences. Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam: University Publication Centre (UPENA).


Abstract Views: 264

PDF Views: 0




  • Risk Perception of Mutual Fund Investors

Abstract Views: 264  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Sharika Hassan
School of Business Studies, Islamic University of Science and Technology, Jammu and Kashmir, India
Asif Iqbal Fazili
School of Business Studies, Islamic University of Science and Technology, Jammu and Kashmir, India

Abstract


Every investor likes return and dislikes risk, but risk is deeply ischolar_mained in all financial markets. A positive relationship persists between risk and return. Mostly investors are risk averse, which means that if everything else is the same, they will select the investment that offers greater certainty. The main objective of this study is to reveal the risk perception of Mutual Fund Investors of Jammu and Kashmir, as risk perception of individual investors usually affects their investment decision. The study considers some of the important factors for understanding the risk perception of individual/retail mutual fund investors of Jammu and Kashmir. For measuring the respondents’ perceptions, the study employs the Likert scale technique. The study employs the Factor Analysis technique to identify the underlying dimensions or factors that explain the correlations among a set of variables regarding the risk perception of mutual fund investors.

Keywords


Mutual Fund Investors, Risk Perception, Factor Analysis, Risk Averse, Market Risk.

References