Abhigyan

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Literature Review on the Relationship Between Motives Of FDI and Subsidiary Performance


Affiliations
1 Assistant Professor, School of Management & Business Studies, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi., India
2 Associate Professor, Dept. of Business Administration, Faculty of Management Studies & Research, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh., India
3 Director, Global Business Consultants, Ex-Professor, IIFT, New Delhi., India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The location choice of foreign direct investment by multinational corporations has been the subject of academic discourse in international business. Given the importance of FDI to firms and policy-makers, this paper seeks to identify the factors that determine the FDI flow in different countries worldwide from 1967-2018. The paper presents the findings by outlining the theoretical framework of FDI and underlying motives of foreign investment. The discussion is then directed towards an overview of studies based on different motives of FDI viz., resource, market, strategic-asset and efficiency related and anticipated performance benefits of FDI. The general discussion on studies based on different investment motives enabled the researcher to outline and explain important constructs of the study. The paper based on literature review further established an explicit relationship between investment motives of FDI and subsidiary performance.

Keywords

Foreign direct investment, FDI motives, Multinational corporations, Subsidiary performance, Internalization advantages, Services FDI, Manufacturing FDI.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Aliber, R. Z. (1970). A theory of direct foreign investment. In Charles P. Kindleberger (Ed.), The International Corporation, MIT Press.

  • Altzinger, W. (1998). Austria's foreign direct investment in Central and Eastern Europe: supply based or market driven? (Working Paper No. 57). Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration.

  • Aryeetey, C., Barthel, F., Busse, M., Loehr, C., and Osei, R. (2008). Empirical study on thedeterminants and pro-development impacts of foreign direct investment in Ghana. Study on behalf of the German Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development and the German Technical Cooperation (GTZ), http://www.hwwi.org/fileadmin/hwwi/Leistungen/ Gutachten/Report-FDIGhana- final.pdf

  • Banga, R. (2003). Impact of government policies and investment agreements on FDI inflows (ICRIER Working Paper No. 116). Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/189636

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.

  • Baumol, William J. (1959). Business Behavior, Value and Growth. MacMillan

  • Benito, G. R., and Tomassen, S. (2003). The Micro-mechanics of foreign operations performance. International business and the eclectic paradigm: Developing the OLI framework. Routledge.

  • Bhaumik, S. K., Beena, P. L., Bhandari, L., and Gokarn, S. (2003). Survey of FDI in India (Working Paper No. 6). Centre for New and Emerging Markets. London Business School.

  • Bitzenis, A., Tsitourias, A., and Vlachos, V. A. (2007). Motives for FDI in a small EMU Member State : The Case of Greece. Journal of Economics & Business, X(2), 11-42.

  • Botric, V., and Škuflic, L. (2006). Main determinants of foreign direct investment in the southeast European countries. Transition Studies Review, 13(2), 359-377.

  • Buckley, P. J., and Casson, M. (2010). Edith Penrose's theory of the growth of the firm and the strategic management of multinational enterprises. In The Multinational Enterprise Revisited (277- 300). Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Cantwell, J., and Narula, R. (2001). The Eclectic Paradigm in the Global Economy. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8(2), 155-172.

  • Chatterjee, S., Mishra, P., and Chatterjee, B. (2013). Determinants of inter-state variations in FDI inflows in India. Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 6(11), 93-120.

  • Chaudhuri, R. B., Pyne, K. P., and Chowdhury, R. A. (2013). Determinants of Manufacturing FDI in India: A Sectoral Analysis. The Journal of Industrial Statistics, 2(2), 217-231.

  • Chidlow, A., and Young, S. (2008). Regional Determinants of FDI Distribution in Poland (Working Paper Number 943). William Davidson Institute.

  • Cui, L., Meyer, K. E., and Hu, H. W. (2014). What drives firms' intent to seek strategic assets by foreign direct investment? A study of emerging economy firms. Journal of World Business, 49(4), 488-501.

  • Dua, P., and Garg, R. (2015). Macroeconomic determinants of foreign direct investment: evidence from India. The Journal of Developing Areas, 49(1),133-155.

  • Dunning, J. H. (1980). Towards an Eclectic Theory of International Production: Some Empirical Tests. Journal of International Business Studies, 11(1), 9-31.

  • Dunning, J. H. 1988. The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1), 1–31.

  • Dunning, J. H. (2000). The Eclectic Paradigm as an Envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity. International Business Review, 9(2), 163-190.

  • Dunning, J. H. (2009). Location and the Multinational Enterprise: A Neglected Factor? Journal of International Business Studies, 40(1), 5-19.

  • Dunning, J. H., and Lundan, S. M. (2008). Multinational enterprises and the global economy (2nd ed.). Edward Elgar Publishing.

  • Dunning, J. H., and Narula, R. (Eds.). (1996). The investment development path revisited. Foreign direct investment and governments: Catalysts for economic restructuring. Routeledge.

  • Ghoshal, S. (1987) Global Strategy An Organizing Framework. Strategic Management Journal, 8, 425-440.

  • Glaister, K. W., and Ahammad, M. F. (2010). Motives for Cross Border Mergers and Acquisitions: Perspective of UK Firms. International Corporate Finance eJournal. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.154981

  • Glaum, M., and Oesterle, M. J. (2007). 40 Years of Research on Internationalization and Firm Performance: More Questions than Answers?. Management International Review, 47(3), 307-317.

  • Gorynia, M., Nowak, J., and Wolneak, R. (2007). Motives & Modes of FDI in Poland. Journal for East European Management Studies, 12(2), 132.

  • Helpman, E., Melitz, M. J., and Yeaple, S. R. (2004). Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms. American Economic Review, 94(1), 300-316.

  • Hollenstein, H. (2005, June). Determinants of International Activities-Are SME's Different? Small Business Economics, 24(5), 431-450.

  • Hymer, S. H. (1976). The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Foreign Direct Investment, [Doctoral Dissertation], M.I.T.

  • Kaur, M., and Sharma, R. (2013). Determinants of foreign direct investment in India: an empirical analysis. Decision, 40(1-2), 57-67.

  • Kinoshita, Y., and Campos, N. F. (2003, december). Why Does FDI Go where it goes? New Evidence from the Transition Economies(Working Paper Number 573). William Davidson Institute

  • Kogut, B., and Chang, S. J. (1991). Technological capabilities and Japanese foreign direct investment in the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 73(3), 401-413.

  • Krugman, P. (1991a). Geography and Trade. Leuven University Press: Leuven.

  • Kudina, A., and Jakubiak, M. (2008). The Motives and Impediments to FDI in the CIS (Working Paper 0370). CASE Warsaw Bishkik Kijiv Thilisi Chisinau Minsk.

  • Lim, G. (2017). What do Malaysian firms seek in Vietnam?. Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 18(2), 131-150.

  • Lu, J., Liu, X., and Wang, H. (2010). Motives for outward FDI of Chinese private firms firm resources, industry dynamics, and government policies. Management and Organization Review, 7(2), 223-248.

  • Luo, Y. (1997). Guanxi and performance of foreign-invested enterprises in China: An empirical inquiry. MIR: Management International Review, 37(1),51-70.

  • Majeed, M. T., and Ahmad, E. (2008). Human Capital Development and FDI in Developing Countries. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/57514/

  • Matysiak, L., and Bausch, A. (2012). Antecedents of MNE performance: blinded by the obvious in 35 years of literature. Multinational Business Review, 20(2), 178–211.

  • Mellahi, K., Guermat, C., Frynas, J., and Bortmani, A. H. (2003). Motive for Foreign Direct Investment in Oman. Thunderbird International Business Review, 45(4), 431-446.

  • Mutinelli, M., and Piscitello, L. (1997). Differences in the strategic orientation of Italian MNEs in Central and Eastern Europe. The influence of firm-specific factors. International Business Review, 6(2), 185-205.

  • Okafor, G., Piesse, J., and Webster, A. (2015). The motives for inward FDI into Sub-Saharan African countries. Journal of Policy Modeling, 37(5), 875-890.

  • Pattayat, S. S. (2016). Examining the determinants of FDI inflows in India. Theoretical & Applied Economics, 23(2), 1-14.

  • Pye, R. (1998). Foreign Direct Investment in Central Europe: Experiences of Major Western Investors. European Management Journal, 16(4), 378-389.

  • Ramaswamy, B., and Yeung, M. (2010). The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Services. The World Economy, 33(4), 573-596.

  • Rastogi, R., and Sawhney, A. (2013). What Attracts FDI in Indian Manufacturing Industries (13-02). Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.

  • Resmini, L. (2000). The determinants of foreign direct investment in the CEECs: New evidence from sectoral patterns. Economics of transition, 8(3), 665-689.

  • Rizwan, T. (2005, September). Understanding the Stratetgic Motivations of Finnish Manufacturing FDIs in Emerging Asian Economies. Asian Business and Management, IV(3), 293-313.

  • Rugman, A. M. (1980). Internalization as a general theory of foreign direct investment: A reappraisal of the literature. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, (H. 2), 365-379.

  • Rugman, A. M., and Verbeke, A. (2004). A perspective on regional and global strategies of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(1), 3-18.

  • Sethi, D., Guisinger, S., Phelan, S. E., and M, B. D. (2003). Trends in Foreign Direct Investment Flows: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(4), 315- 326.

  • Shatz, H. J., and Venables, A. (2000). The geography of international investment (Vol. 2338). World Bank Publications.

  • Stoian, C., and Filippaios, F. (2008). Dunning's Eclectic Paradigm: A holistic, yet context specific framework for analysing the determinants of outward FDI. Evidence from International Greek investments. International Business Review, 17, 344-367.

  • Tatoglu, E., and Glaister, K. W. (1998). Western MNCs FDI in Turkey: An analysis of Location specific factors. Management International Review, 38(2), 133-159.

  • Thuy Le, L. (2007). Subnational Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: The Case of Vietnam, American University Library, Washington D.C.

  • Trapczynski, P. (2013). Does foreign direct investment theory explain subsidiary performance? A critical literature review. The Poznan University of Economics Review, 13(2), 47.

  • Urata, S., and Kawai, H. (2000). The determinants of the location of foreign direct investment by Japanese small and medium-sized enterprises. Small Business Economics, 15(2), 79-103.

  • Verbeke, A., Li, L., and Goerzen, A. (2009). Toward more effective research on the multinationality-performance relationship. Management International Review, 49(2), 149-161.

  • Wadhwa, K., and Reddy, S. S. (2011). Foreign direct investment into developing Asian countries: The role of market seeking, resource seeking and efficiency seeking factors. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(11), 219.

  • Yannopoulos, G. N. (1983). The growth of transnational banking. In Mark Casson (Ed.), Growth of International Business. Allen and Unwin

  • Zheng, P. (2009). A comparison of FDI determinants in China and India. Thunderbird International Business Review, 51(3), 263-279.

  • Zheng, P. (2013). The variation in Indian inward FDI patterns. Management International Review, 53(6), 819-839.

  • Zhou, D., Li, S., and David, K. T. (2002). The impact of FDI on the productivity of domestic firms: the case of China. International Business Review, 11(4), 465-484.

  • Zitta, S. J., and Powers, T. L. (2003). Motives for foreign direct investment in the United States. Thunderbird International Business Review, 45(3), 275-288.


Abstract Views: 266

PDF Views: 0




  • A Literature Review on the Relationship Between Motives Of FDI and Subsidiary Performance

Abstract Views: 266  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Alka Sanjeev
Assistant Professor, School of Management & Business Studies, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi., India
Mohd Afaq Khan
Associate Professor, Dept. of Business Administration, Faculty of Management Studies & Research, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh., India
R. K. Wadhwa
Director, Global Business Consultants, Ex-Professor, IIFT, New Delhi., India

Abstract


The location choice of foreign direct investment by multinational corporations has been the subject of academic discourse in international business. Given the importance of FDI to firms and policy-makers, this paper seeks to identify the factors that determine the FDI flow in different countries worldwide from 1967-2018. The paper presents the findings by outlining the theoretical framework of FDI and underlying motives of foreign investment. The discussion is then directed towards an overview of studies based on different motives of FDI viz., resource, market, strategic-asset and efficiency related and anticipated performance benefits of FDI. The general discussion on studies based on different investment motives enabled the researcher to outline and explain important constructs of the study. The paper based on literature review further established an explicit relationship between investment motives of FDI and subsidiary performance.

Keywords


Foreign direct investment, FDI motives, Multinational corporations, Subsidiary performance, Internalization advantages, Services FDI, Manufacturing FDI.

References