Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Bioremediation Technologies
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Bioremediation is an invaluable tool box for wider application in the realm of environmental protection. Bioremediation technologies have become attractive alternatives to conventional cleanup technologies due to relatively low capital costs and their inherently aesthetic nature. Bioremediation is generally considered to include natural attenuation (little or no human action), bio-stimulation or bio-augmentation, the deliberate addition of natural or engineered micro-organisms to accelerate the desired catalytic capabilities. The scope of environmental bioremediation extends to: Inorganics viz., arsenic, mercury, chromium, fluoride, cyanide, abandoned mines, fly ash disposed sites, engineered phytotreatment technologies, biological permeable barriers and organics viz., petroleum hydrocarbons, pesticides and explosives. A variety of plants, natural, transgenic and/ or associated with rhizosphere microorganisms are extraordinarily active in these biological interventions and in cleaning up pollutants by removing or immobilizing them. Bioremediation approach is currently applied to contain contaminants in soil, groundwater, surface water and sediments including air. Thus, Bioremediation is emerging as an effective, environment friendly and innovative technology for treatment of a wide variety of contaminants in water and soil.
Keywords
Bioremediation, Bio Stimulation, Bio Augmentation, Wetland Construction.
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
User
Font Size
Information
- Andreoni, V., Baggi, G., Colombo, M., Cavalca, L., Zangrossi, M. and Bernasconi, S. (1998). Degradation of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol by a specialised organism and by indigenous soil microflora: bioaugmentation and self-remediability for soil restoration, Lett. Appl. Microbiol., 27 : 86–92.
- Da Silva,M.L.B. and Alvarez, P.J.J. (2004). Enhanced anaerobic biodegradation of benzene-toluene-ethylbenzene-xylene-ethanol mixtures in bioaugmented aquifer columns, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 70 : 4720–4726.
- El-Nawawy, A.S.,Daher, R.A., Yateem, A. and Awadhi, N.A. (1995). Enhanced land-farming for bioremediation of oil contaminated soil. In M. Moo-Young et al. (eds) Environmental Biotechnology: Principles & Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherland, 249-258pp.
- Fahnestock, F. M. V.,Wickramanayake, G. B., Kratzke K. J. and Major W. R. (1998). Biopile design, Operation, and Maintenance Handbook for Treating Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soil, Battelle Press, Columbus, OH.
- Gallego, J.L.R., Loredo, J., Llamas, J.F., Vazquez, F. and Sanchez, J. (2001). Bioremediation of diesel-contaminated soils: Evaluation of potential in situ techniques by study of bacterial degradation. Biodegradation, 12: 325–335.
- Jitnuyanont, P., Sayavedra-Soto, L.A. and Semprini, L. (2001). Bioaugmentation of butane-utilizing micro-organisms to promote cometabolism of 1,1,1-trichloroethane in groundwater microcosms, Biodegradation, 12 : 11–22.
- Kadlec, R.H. and Knight, R.L. (1996). Treatment wetlands. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton. 893.
- Louisa, W. P. (2010). Review: In situ and bioremediation of organic pollutants in aquatic sediments. J. Hazardous Materials, 177 : 81-89.
- Ma, Y., Prasad, M.N.V., Rajkumar, M. and Freitas, H. (2011). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and endophytes accelerate phytoremediation of metalliferous soils. Biotechnol. Adv., 29 : 248-258.
- Mishra, S., Jyot, J., Kuhad, R. C. and Lal, B. (2001). In situ bioremediation potential of an oily sludge degrading bacterial consortium. Curr. Microbiol., 43 (5) : 328-335.
- Mishra, S., Lal, B., Jyot, J., Rajan, S. and Khanna, S. (1999). Field study: In situ bioremediation of oily sludge contaminated land using oilzapper. In Proceedings of Hazardous and Industrial Wastes, pp. 177-186, edited by D Bishop. Pennsylvania, USA: Technomic Publishing Co. Inc.
- Prasad, M.N.V. (2007). Aquatic plants for phytotechnology. In, Environmental Bioremediation Technologies. Eds S.N. Singh and R.D. Tripathi. pp. 259-274. Springer.
- Prasad, M.N.V., Sajwan, K.S. and Naidu, Ravi (2006). Trace elements in the environment: Biogeochemistry, Biotechnology and Bioremediation. CRC Press. Boca Raton. Taylor and Francis Group. 726 .
- Schroeder, P. and Schwitzguebel, J.P. (2004). New cost action launched: Phytotechnologies to promote sustainable land use and improve food safety. J. Soils & Sedim., 4 (3) : 205.
- Shim, H., Shin, E. and Yang, S.T. (2002). A continuous fibrous-bed bioreactor for BTEX biodegradation by a co-culture of Pseudomonas putida and Pseudomonas fluorescens. Adv. Environ. Res., 7 (1) : 203-216.
- Smith, A.E, Hristova, K., Wood, I., Mackay, D.M., Lory, E., Lorenzana, D. and Scow, K.M. (2005). Comparison of biostimulation versus bioaugmentation with bacterial strain PM1 for treatment of groundwater contaminated with methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), Environ. Health Perspect, 113 : 317–322.
- Srivastava, S. (2015).Bioremediation of contaminated soil and water : An overview. Internat. J. Global Sci. Res., 2(3) : 199-212.
- Trejo, M. and Quintero, R. (2000). Bioremediation of contaminated soils. In : Olguin, E.J., Sanchez, G. and Hernandez, E. (eds) Environmental Biotechnology and Cleaner Bioprocesses. Taylor and Francis, pp. 179-188.
- U.S. EPA (1990). Handbook on in situ treatment of hazardous waste contaminated soils, EPA/540/2-90/002.
- U.S. EPA (1996). Seminars. Bioremediation of hazardous waste sites : Practical Approach to Implementation, EPA/625/K-96/001.
- Wenderoth, D.F., Rosenbrock, P., Abraham, W.R., Pieper, D.H. and Hofle, M.G. (2003). Bacterial community dynamics during biostimulation and bioaugmentation experiments aiming at chlorobenzene degradation in groundwater. Microb. Ecol., 46 (2) : 161-176.
Abstract Views: 482
PDF Views: 0