Asian Journal of Bio Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Studies on Major Stem Pests and Incremental Cost Benefit Ration for Different Integrated Pest Management Modules on Soybean


Affiliations
1 Department of Entomology, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (M.S.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The stemfly (Melanagromyza sojae, Zehntner) and girdle beetle (Obereopsis brevis Swedenbord) are two major pests of soybean in this region during Kharif crop. It was felt imperative to develop IPM for these pests hence, this experimentation was carried out. Data revealed that MAU IPM module was effective in reducing the infestation of girdle beetle (6.30%) and stem fly (7.95%), whereas in chemical control infestation was (7.35%) and (8.02%) per cent in girdle beetle and stem fly, respectively. Considering the stem tunneled length it was found that girdle beetle and stem fly was (12.14%) and (15.54%) in MAU IPM module whereas in chemical control, it was (14.56%) and (15.17%) by girdle beetle and stem fly, respectively. Cost benefit ratio of these methods were compared, it was found that CBR was highest (1:7.65) in MAU IPM module followed by chemical control (1:5.82). MAU IPM module included the eco-friendly and sustainable methods to manage these major regular pests of soybean and which was found effective and economical methods.

Keywords

IPM, Integrated Pest Management, Stem Pest, Girdle Beetle, Stem Fly, Stem Tunneling, Cost Benefit Ratio.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Anonymous (1995). Annual report, All India Co-ordinated Research Project on Soybean, Marathwada Agricultural University, Parbhani (M.S.) INDIA. 122-144pp.

  • Anonymous (1997). Annual report all India co-ordinated research project on soybean. Marathwada Agricultural University, Parbhani (M.S.) INDIA, 45-46pp.

  • Anonymous (2014). Annual report all India co-ordinated research project on soybean.Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Agricultural University, Parbhani (M.S.) INDIA, 4-5pp.

  • Bhosale, B.B., Bhede, B.V., Patange, N.R., Kambale,S.K. and Baig, K.S. (2008). IPM in soybean, Marathwada Agricultural University Extn. Folder No. 2/2008.

  • Chechani, V.K., Joshi, F.L. Sharma, U.S. and Ameta, O.P. (2002). Incidence and chemical control of stemfly Melanagromyza sojae (Zehntner) on soybean. Indian J. Appl. Ent., 14 : 9-12.

  • Odulaja and Nokoe (1993). Maximin- minimax method. A Maximin- minimax approach for classifying crop varieties into resistant groups based on yield potential and loss. Int.J. Pest. Mgmt., 39 : 64-67.

  • Padiwal, N.K., Rana, B.S. and Ameta, O.P. (2007). Incidence of insect pests in soybean in relation to abiotic environmental factors. Pestology, 31(2): 21-24.

  • Patel, Meena U., Kulkarni, A.V. and Gavkare, Omkar (2014). Evaluating the efficacy of Novel molecules against soybean defoliators. The Bioscan., 9 (2) : 577-580.

  • Patel, Rakesh Kumar, Gupta, S. B. and Thakur, Ashwini Kumar (2015). Attributing characteres, yield and nodulation on soybean of Chhatisgarh plain, The Bioscan, 10 (1) : 275-278.

  • Puri, S.N.,Sharma O.P., Murthy, K., Dhandapani. S.A. and Kumar, P. (1999). Validation of IPM modules in cotton NCIPM Annual Report 1998-1999. pp. 21-27.

  • Rathod, P.K. (2011). Evaluation of IPM modules for soybean. Ph.D. (Ag.) Thesis, Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, M.S. (INDIA).

  • Singh, O.P. and Singh, K.J. (1990). Seasonal incidence and damage of Melanagromyza sojae on soybean. Indian J. Plant Protec., 18 (2) : 271-275.

  • Tiwari, S.P. (2003). Improvement of yield and yield potential in soybean : An analysis and synthesis. J. Oilseed Res., 20 (1) : 1-8.

  • Venkateshan, T. and Kundu, G.G. (1994). Bioefficacy of insecticides for the control of stemfly and white fly infesting the soybean crop. Indian J. Ent., 56(4): 418-421.


Abstract Views: 349

PDF Views: 2




  • Studies on Major Stem Pests and Incremental Cost Benefit Ration for Different Integrated Pest Management Modules on Soybean

Abstract Views: 349  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

A. A. Motaphale
Department of Entomology, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (M.S.), India
B. B. Bhosale
Department of Entomology, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (M.S.), India
F. S. Khan
Department of Entomology, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (M.S.), India

Abstract


The stemfly (Melanagromyza sojae, Zehntner) and girdle beetle (Obereopsis brevis Swedenbord) are two major pests of soybean in this region during Kharif crop. It was felt imperative to develop IPM for these pests hence, this experimentation was carried out. Data revealed that MAU IPM module was effective in reducing the infestation of girdle beetle (6.30%) and stem fly (7.95%), whereas in chemical control infestation was (7.35%) and (8.02%) per cent in girdle beetle and stem fly, respectively. Considering the stem tunneled length it was found that girdle beetle and stem fly was (12.14%) and (15.54%) in MAU IPM module whereas in chemical control, it was (14.56%) and (15.17%) by girdle beetle and stem fly, respectively. Cost benefit ratio of these methods were compared, it was found that CBR was highest (1:7.65) in MAU IPM module followed by chemical control (1:5.82). MAU IPM module included the eco-friendly and sustainable methods to manage these major regular pests of soybean and which was found effective and economical methods.

Keywords


IPM, Integrated Pest Management, Stem Pest, Girdle Beetle, Stem Fly, Stem Tunneling, Cost Benefit Ratio.

References