Asian Journal of Bio Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Evaluation of Resistance for Early Blight Caused by Alternaria solani (Ellis and Martin) Sorauer in Tomato


Affiliations
1 Department of Mycology and Plant Pathology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi (U.P.), India
2 Division of Crop Improvement, Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Varanasi (U.P.), India
3 ICAR, CAZRI, KrishiVigyan Kendra, Pali (Rajasthan), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


A trial was conducted during Rabi season 2011-2012 under field conditions for phenotyping of germplasm under natural conditions that have been developed for resistance against early blight of tomato caused by Alternaria solani. Field studies showed significant variation among all tested germplasmlines with respect to early blight disease assessment. Under field conditions the natural disease severity was scored on a five-point scale (0-5).The per cent disease index (PDI) and area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) value were calculated on the basis of data recorded. The mean AUDPC value in resistant (206 lines); moderately resistant (223 lines); moderately susceptible (129 lines) and susceptible (143 lines) tomato lines ranged between 102.00 to 447.25; 447.26 to 792.50; 792.51 to 1137.75 and 1137.76 to 1483.00, respectively.

Keywords

Alternaria solani, Tomato, Natural Inoculums, Phenotyping, Resistant, AUDPC.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Barksdale, T. H. (1971). Field evaluation for tomato early blight resistance. Plant Dis. Rep., 55:807-809.

  • Barksdale, T.H. and Stoner, A.K. (1977). A study of the inheritance of tomato early blight resistance. Plant Dis. Rep., 61: 63-65.

  • Basu, P. K. (1974). Measuring early blight, its progress and influence on fruit losses in nine tomato cultivars. Can Plant Dis. Surv., 54 : 45-51.

  • Datar, V. V. and Mayee, C. D. (1981). Assessment of losses in tomato yields due to early blight. Indian Phytopathol., 34 : 191–195.

  • Foolad, M.R., Ntahimpera, N., Christ, B.J. and Lin, G.Y. (2000). Comparison of field, greenhouse and detached leaflet evaluations of tomato germplasm for early blight resistance. Plant Dis., 84: 967-972.

  • Gwary, D. M. and Nahunnaro, H. (1998). Epiphytotics of early blight of tomatoes in Northeastern Nigeria. Crop Prot., 17: 619-624.

  • Johnson, D. A. and Wilcoxson, R. D. (1982). A talbe of areas under disease progress curve. In: Technical Bulletin. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Texas.

  • Keinath, A., DuBose, V.B. and Rathwell, P.J. (1996).Efficacy and economics of three fungicide application schedules for early blight control and yield of fresh market tomato. Plant Disease., 80: 1277-1282.

  • Madden, L., Pennypacker, S. P. and MacNab (1978). FAST a forecast system for Alternaria solani on tomato. Phytopathology, 68: 1354-1358.

  • Maiero, M., Ng, T. J. and Barksdale, T. H. (1989).Combining ability estimates for early blight resistance in tomato. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 114 : 118-121.

  • Maiero, M., Ng, T.J. and Barksdale, T.H. (1990a). Genetic resistance to early blight in tomato breeding lines. Hort. Sci., 25: 344-346.

  • Maiero, M., Ng, T.J. and Barksdale, T.H. (1990b). Inheritance of collar rot resistance in the tomato breeding lines C1943 and NC EBR-2.Phytopathology,80: 1365-1368.

  • Nash, A.F. and Gardner, R.G. (1988). Heritability of tomato early blight resistance derived from Lycopersicon hirsutum PI 126445. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 113: 264-268.

  • Peralta, I. E., Knapp, S. and Spooner, D. M. (2005). New species of wild tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicon: Solanaceae) from Northern Peru. Sys. Bot., 30: 424-434.

  • Rotem, J. and Reichert, I. (1964). Dew a principal moisture factor enabling early blight epidemics in a semiarid region of Israel. Plant Dis. Rep., 48:211–215.

  • Shaner, G. and Finney, R. E. (1977). The effect of nitrogen fertilization on the expression of slow-mildewing resistance in ‘Knox’ wheat. Phytopathology, 67 : 1051 – 1056.

  • Sherf, A. F. and MacNab, A.A. (1986). Vegetable diseases and their control. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 634-640.

  • Shtienberg, D., Blachinsky, D., Kremer, Y., Ben-Hador, G. and Dinoor, A. (1995). Integration of genotype and age-related resistance to reduce fungicide use in management of Alternaria diseases of cotton and potato. Phytopathology, 85: 995-1002.

  • Vakalounakis, D.J. (1983). Evaluation of tomato cultivars for resistance to Alternaria blight. Ann. Appl. Biol., 102: 138-139.

  • Walker, J.C. (1952). Diseases of vegetable crops, 1st Ed. Mac Graw-Hill Book Company, Inc. New York, pp. 471-474.

  • Walter, J.M., Kelbert, D.G.A. and Hayslip, N.C. (1961). Manapal, a disease resistance tomato with the desirable traits of Rutgars. Florida University Agricultural Experimental Station, Gainesville Circ S–131.

  • Wheeler, B. E. J. (1969). An Introduction to plant diseases. John Wiley and Sons Limited, London, pp.301.

  • Anonymous (2012). APEDA, Agriculture Data Base, http://agriexchange.apeda.gov.in.


Abstract Views: 340

PDF Views: 1




  • Evaluation of Resistance for Early Blight Caused by Alternaria solani (Ellis and Martin) Sorauer in Tomato

Abstract Views: 340  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

S. M. Yadav
Department of Mycology and Plant Pathology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi (U.P.), India
Vineeta Singh
Department of Mycology and Plant Pathology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi (U.P.), India
Major Singh
Division of Crop Improvement, Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Varanasi (U.P.), India
Laxman Prasad Balai
ICAR, CAZRI, KrishiVigyan Kendra, Pali (Rajasthan), India
Ramesh Chand
Department of Mycology and Plant Pathology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi (U.P.), India

Abstract


A trial was conducted during Rabi season 2011-2012 under field conditions for phenotyping of germplasm under natural conditions that have been developed for resistance against early blight of tomato caused by Alternaria solani. Field studies showed significant variation among all tested germplasmlines with respect to early blight disease assessment. Under field conditions the natural disease severity was scored on a five-point scale (0-5).The per cent disease index (PDI) and area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) value were calculated on the basis of data recorded. The mean AUDPC value in resistant (206 lines); moderately resistant (223 lines); moderately susceptible (129 lines) and susceptible (143 lines) tomato lines ranged between 102.00 to 447.25; 447.26 to 792.50; 792.51 to 1137.75 and 1137.76 to 1483.00, respectively.

Keywords


Alternaria solani, Tomato, Natural Inoculums, Phenotyping, Resistant, AUDPC.

References