Asian Journal of Bio Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Effect of Microbial Inoculants on the Yield of Beet-ischolar_main (Beta Vulgaris)


Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Microbiology, University of Agricultural Sciences, G.K.V.K., Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Horticulture, University of Agricultural Sciences, G.K.V.K., Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
3 Department of Plant Pathology, University of Agricultural Sciences, G.K.V.K., Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Comparative performance of Azotobacter chroococcum, Glucanobacter diazotrophicus tested both at 50 per cent and 75 per cent recommended N showed that Glucanobacter diazotrophicus was more effective than Azotobacter chroococcum in improving the tuber yield. The total tuber yield per plot and per hectare in plants was maximum in combined inoculation of microbial inoculants viz., Azotobacter chroococcum, Glucanobacter diazotrophicus, Bacillus megaterium and Trichoderma harzianum, with 75 per cent N, P with full dose of K compared to control plants (FYM alone T14).

Keywords

Microbial Inoculants, Yield, Beet-ischolar_main
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Anonymous (2001). Text book of vegetables, tuber crops and spices, Directorate of Information and Publications of Agriculture, ICAR, NEW DELHI (INDIA). pp.34-37.

  • Aykroyd, W.R. (1963). The nutritive value of Indian foods and the planning of satisfactory diets. ICMR special Kept. 42., NEW DELHI (INDIA).

  • Basavaraju, M.N. (1999). Effect of Azotobacter inoculation on growth and yield of radish. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Agriculture Sciences, Bengaluru, KARNATAKA (INDIA).

  • Jambukar, G.S. and Wange, S.S. (2005). Field studies on response of sugar beet to microbial inoculants under graded nitrogen levels. J. soil & crops, 15 (2): 290-296.

  • Kale, P.N. and Masalkar, S.D. (1993). Agro-techniques for ischolar_main crops. Advances in horticulture. Vol. 5, Vegetables crops: part I. pp. 111-113.

  • Muthukumarasamy, R., Revathi, G. and Solayappan, A.R. (1994). Biofertilizers a supplement or substitute for chemical nitrogen for sugar crops. Main biocontrol research laboratory, Chengalpattu., 25: 7- 8.

  • Nilsson, T. (1973). The pigment content in beet-ischolar_main with regard to cultivar, growth development and growth conditions. Swedish J. agric. Res., 3: 187-200.

  • Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V. (1967). Statistical methods for agricultural workers. Indian Council of Agriculture Research, NEW DELHI (INDIA). 155 pp.

  • Sadhu, M.K. (1986). Root crops. In: Vegetable crops in India (T.K. Bose and M.G. Som, Eds.). Naya Prakash, Calcutta (W.B.) INDIA. pp. 150-153.

  • Sharma, S., Dohroo, N.P. and Korla, B.N. (1997). Effect of VAM inoculation and other field practices on growth parameters of Ginger. J. Hill Res., 10: 74-76.

  • Sucheetha, S.M. Mohamod (1989). Effect of Azospirillum, zinc and iron on growth and development of cassava (Manihot esculenta crantz). M.Sc. (Hort.) Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agriculture University, Coimbatore, T.N. (INDIA).

  • Sundaravelu, S. and Muthukrishnan, T. (1993). Effect of seed treatment with Azospirilum and GA on the growth and yield of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) var. Japanese white. South Indian Hort., 41(4): 212-213.

  • Thamiz Vandan, R. and Nanjan, K. (1998). Biofertilizers for potato in Nilgiris. South Indian Hort., 46(4): 211-213. The Hindu Survey of Indian Agriculture 2004. pp.170-173.

  • Wange, S.S. (1995). Effect of biofertilizers and different levels of major nutrients on growth and yield of garlic (Allium sativum Linn.). J. Soils & Crops., 5(4): 101-103.


Abstract Views: 600

PDF Views: 0




  • Effect of Microbial Inoculants on the Yield of Beet-ischolar_main (Beta Vulgaris)

Abstract Views: 600  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

J. Ajay Kumar
Department of Agricultural Microbiology, University of Agricultural Sciences, G.K.V.K., Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
K. R. Sreeramulu
Department of Horticulture, University of Agricultural Sciences, G.K.V.K., Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
G. Kushala
Department of Plant Pathology, University of Agricultural Sciences, G.K.V.K., Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Abstract


Comparative performance of Azotobacter chroococcum, Glucanobacter diazotrophicus tested both at 50 per cent and 75 per cent recommended N showed that Glucanobacter diazotrophicus was more effective than Azotobacter chroococcum in improving the tuber yield. The total tuber yield per plot and per hectare in plants was maximum in combined inoculation of microbial inoculants viz., Azotobacter chroococcum, Glucanobacter diazotrophicus, Bacillus megaterium and Trichoderma harzianum, with 75 per cent N, P with full dose of K compared to control plants (FYM alone T14).

Keywords


Microbial Inoculants, Yield, Beet-ischolar_main

References