Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Role of Socio-Economic Variable Enhancing Self-Esteem Among Adolescence


Affiliations
1 Department of Human Development and Family Studies, College of Home Science, C.C.S. Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar (Haryana), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Self-esteem as the experience of capable of meeting life challenge and being worthy of happiness. In today’s world self-esteem has been viewed as an important tool to face the competitive life. The study was conducted in Hisar district of Haryana state. All the adolescents studying in 9th and 10th standard falling in the age group 15 – 16 years were included in the sample for the study. Self-esteem was taken as dependent variable. Self-Esteem was assessed by Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) by Rosenberg’s (1989). Independent variable was socio-economic variables which included adolescent gender, caste, family type, family size, parental occupation and family income. Result revealed that non-significant differences were obtained in self – esteem mean scores when compared against family structure and annual income. This reflects that family structure and annual income make no significant differences in the scores of self – esteem of adolescents. Non-significant differences were established for selfesteem as per family size, caste, number of siblings and annual income. However comparison of mean scores revealed that adolescents of large families had slightly better self-esteem than adolescents living in medium and small families.

Keywords

Adolescents, Self–Esteem, Gender, Academic Achievement, Parental Relationship, Family.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Allen, J.P. and Hauser, S.T. (1996). Autonomy and relatedness in adolescent-family interactions as predictors of young adults’ states of mind regarding attachment. Development & Psychopathol., 8 : 793-809.
  • Baron, R.A. and Byrne, D. (1991). Social psychology: understanding human interactions. (6th Ed.).Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Baumeister, R.F. (1993). Understanding the inner nature of self-esteem. In R.F. Baumeister (Ed.), Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self regard. pp. 201-218. New York: Plenum.
  • Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and Loss, Vol. 1. Pengiune, New York.
  • Brookover, W.E. (1985). Self concept of ability and school achievement. East Lansing, Michigan: Office of Research and Public Information, Michigan State University.
  • Dhal, A., Bhatia, S., Sharma, V. and Gupta, P. (2007). Adolescent self –esteem, attachment and loneliness. J. Adolesc. Ment. Health, 3(3) : 61-63.
  • DuBois, D.L., Burk-Braxton, C., Swenson, L. P., Tevendale, H. D. and Hardesty, J.L. (2002). Race and gender influences on adjustment in early adolescence: Investigation of an integrative model. Child Development, 73:1573– 1592.
  • Galambos, N.L., Barker, E.T. and Krahn, H.J. (2006). Depression, self-esteem, and anger in emerging adulthood: Seven-year trajectories. Developmental Psychol., 42: 350–365.
  • Laible, D.J., Carlo, G. and Roesch, S.C. (2004). Pathways to self-esteem in late adolescence: The role of parent and peer attachment, empathy and social behaviors. J. Adolescence, 27 : 703-716.
  • Manning, M.A., Bear, C.G. and Minke, K.M. (2006). Self-concept and self-esteem. In G.G. Bear and K.M. Minke (Eds.). Children need III: Development, prevention and intervention pp.341 356.Washington, DC: National association of school psychologist.
  • Parish, T.S. and Wiggle, S.E. (1985). A longitudinal study of the impact of parental divorce on adolescent’s evaluation of self and parents. Adolescence, 77: 239-244.
  • Reasoner, R.(2005). The true meaning of selfesteem. Retrieved November 4 th from international council for self-esteem.
  • Rosenberg, M. (1986). Self-concept to middle childhood to adolescence. In J. S. uls (Eds), Psychological perspectives on the self, pp. 107-136. Hillsdale, NJ; Erlbaum.
  • Rosenberg, M. (1989). Society and the adolescent self-image (Rev.ed.). Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
  • Rosenberg, M., Carmi, S. and Carrie, S. (1995). Globel selfe-steem and specific self-esteem. American Sociological Review, 141-156.
  • Steinberg, L. (2001). We know some things: Parent- adolescent relationships in retrospect and prospect. J. Res. Adolescence, 11(1): 1-19.
  • Uba, I., Yaacob, S.N., Juhari, R. and Talib, M.A. (2010). Effect of self-esteem on the relationship between depression and bullying among teenagers in Malaysia. Canadian Center of Sci. & Edu., 6(12):77-85.

Abstract Views: 234

PDF Views: 0




  • The Role of Socio-Economic Variable Enhancing Self-Esteem Among Adolescence

Abstract Views: 234  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Sunita
Department of Human Development and Family Studies, College of Home Science, C.C.S. Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar (Haryana), India
Pinki Rani
Department of Human Development and Family Studies, College of Home Science, C.C.S. Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar (Haryana), India

Abstract


Self-esteem as the experience of capable of meeting life challenge and being worthy of happiness. In today’s world self-esteem has been viewed as an important tool to face the competitive life. The study was conducted in Hisar district of Haryana state. All the adolescents studying in 9th and 10th standard falling in the age group 15 – 16 years were included in the sample for the study. Self-esteem was taken as dependent variable. Self-Esteem was assessed by Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) by Rosenberg’s (1989). Independent variable was socio-economic variables which included adolescent gender, caste, family type, family size, parental occupation and family income. Result revealed that non-significant differences were obtained in self – esteem mean scores when compared against family structure and annual income. This reflects that family structure and annual income make no significant differences in the scores of self – esteem of adolescents. Non-significant differences were established for selfesteem as per family size, caste, number of siblings and annual income. However comparison of mean scores revealed that adolescents of large families had slightly better self-esteem than adolescents living in medium and small families.

Keywords


Adolescents, Self–Esteem, Gender, Academic Achievement, Parental Relationship, Family.

References