Asian Journal of Home Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Interrelationship Between Familial Characteristics and Marital Satisfaction of University Teachers in Northern Karnataka-A Gender Analysis


Affiliations
1 ICAR-KVK, Chintamani, Chikkaballapura (Karnataka), India
2 Department of Human Development and Family Studies, College of Community Science, University of Agricultural Sciences, DHARWAD (KARNATAKA), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


An ex-post-facto design on “Interrelationship between familial characteristics and marital satisfaction of University teachers in Northern Karnataka-A Gender analysis” was carried out on a sample of 150 University teachers drawn from three cities of Northern Karnataka. Teachers offering UG/PG courses in agriculture/science faculty belonging to Assistant professor to Professor and above cadre were randomly selected. Familial characteristics included family environment, family involvement and social support of University teachers assessed using family environment scale developed by Bhatia and Chadha (1993), family involvement scale by Misra et al. (1990) and social support questionnaire by Sarason et al. (1983). Marital satisfaction was assessed using questionnaire developed by Haynes et al. (1992). Results revealed that more than half of State Agricultural University (67.0%) and Non- State Agricultural University (67.3%) teachers had high level of family environment and none of them fell in low level. The family environment of both SAU and Non-SAU teachers differed significantly by gender, indicating that females had better family environment compared to male teachers. Most of the SAU (84.5%) and Non-SAU (85.5%) teachers revealed high level of family involvement and none were in low level. With regard to social support, teachers of SAU (73.8%) and Non-SAU (70.0%) received high social support but none were in low level. High level of marital satisfaction was observed in most of the SAU (83.8%) and Non-SAU (94.1%) teachers and the rest were in average levels. Statistical analysis through ANOVA indicated that there were no main and interactionary effects of university, gender and cadre on marital satisfaction. Positive and significant correlation was observed between family environment and family involvement with marital satisfaction of SAU and Non-SAU teachers. This indicated that the more conducive the family environment the higher the marital satisfaction of both the groups of teachers and vice versa.

Keywords

Family Environment, Involvement, Social Support, Marital Satisfaction.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Ahmad (2007). Work-family conflict, life-cycle stage, social support and coping strategies among women employees, J. Human Resource. Adult Learn., 3(1): 70-78.

  • Bhatia, H. and Chadha, N.K. (1993). Manual for family environment scale (FES), Ankur Psychological Agency., Indiranagar, Lucknow.

  • Bir, E.A. (2006). Marital satisfaction in Turkish remarried families: Comparison among marital status, effect of step children and contributing factors, A thesis, Graduate School of Social Sciences of Middle East Technical University.

  • Chalandra, M.B., Taylor, R.J., Lincoln, K.D., Chatters, L.M. and Jackson, J.S. (2008). Marital satisfaction among African Americans and Black Caribbeans: Findings from the National Survey of American Life. Family Relations, 57(2): 239–253.

  • Devi, U.L. and Mayuri, K. (2001). Perceptions of husbands and wives on family environment. J.Com.Gui.Res., 18(3): 275-288.

  • Gupta, N. and Shukla, A. (2006). Preditors of job satisfaction, MQ andmental health among dual career couples across work family integration. Indian Psyc. Rev., 66(2): 73-82.

  • Haynes, S.N., Floyd, F.J., Lemsky, C., Rogers, E., Winemiller, D., Heilman, N., Werle, M. and Murphy, T. (1992). Marital satisfaction questionnaire for older persons. Psychological Assessment, 4(4): 473-482.

  • Karambayya, R. and Reilly, A.H. (1992). Dual earner couples: Attitudes and actions in the restructuring work for family. J. Organizational Behavior, 13(6): 585-601.

  • Kate, S. (2009). The relationship satisfaction of heterosexual couples in one low income, semi-rural western cape community, Thesis presented at the University of Stellenbosch.

  • Liat, K. and Rayyan, F. (2006). Relationships between dual-earner spouses, strategies for coping with Home-Work demands and emotional well-being.Comm. Work & Fam., 9(4): 457-477.

  • Misra, S., Ghosh, R. and Kanungo, R.N. (1990). Measurement of family involvement. J.Cross-Cultural Psychol., 21(2): 232-248.

  • Sarada Devi, M. (2004). Perception of work and non-working women on contribution of self and family variables towards their relative empowerment in urban families. J. Com. Gui. Res., 21(3): 257-265.

  • Sarason, I.G., Levine, H.M., Basham, R.B., and Sarason, B.R., (1983). Assessing social support: The Social Support Questionnaire. J. Personality. Soc. Psy., 44 : 127-139.

  • Shek, D.L.T. (1995). Gender differences in marital quality and wellbeing in Chinese married adults. J. Sex Roles, 32 (11-12): 699-715.

  • Sweet, S. and Moen, P. (2007). Integrating educational careers in work and family: Women’s return to school and family life quality. Community, Work & Family, 10(2): 231-250.

  • Voydanoff, P. (2005). Social integration, work family conflict and facilitation, and job and marital quality. J. Mar. Family, 67: 666-679.

  • Yadav, V.S. and Halyal, P.S. (1999). Job involvement and family involvement as determinants of job satisfaction and marital satisfaction. J.Com.Gui.Res., 16(3): 291-304.


Abstract Views: 217

PDF Views: 0




  • Interrelationship Between Familial Characteristics and Marital Satisfaction of University Teachers in Northern Karnataka-A Gender Analysis

Abstract Views: 217  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

P. G. Holeyannavar
ICAR-KVK, Chintamani, Chikkaballapura (Karnataka), India
P. B. Khadi
Department of Human Development and Family Studies, College of Community Science, University of Agricultural Sciences, DHARWAD (KARNATAKA), India

Abstract


An ex-post-facto design on “Interrelationship between familial characteristics and marital satisfaction of University teachers in Northern Karnataka-A Gender analysis” was carried out on a sample of 150 University teachers drawn from three cities of Northern Karnataka. Teachers offering UG/PG courses in agriculture/science faculty belonging to Assistant professor to Professor and above cadre were randomly selected. Familial characteristics included family environment, family involvement and social support of University teachers assessed using family environment scale developed by Bhatia and Chadha (1993), family involvement scale by Misra et al. (1990) and social support questionnaire by Sarason et al. (1983). Marital satisfaction was assessed using questionnaire developed by Haynes et al. (1992). Results revealed that more than half of State Agricultural University (67.0%) and Non- State Agricultural University (67.3%) teachers had high level of family environment and none of them fell in low level. The family environment of both SAU and Non-SAU teachers differed significantly by gender, indicating that females had better family environment compared to male teachers. Most of the SAU (84.5%) and Non-SAU (85.5%) teachers revealed high level of family involvement and none were in low level. With regard to social support, teachers of SAU (73.8%) and Non-SAU (70.0%) received high social support but none were in low level. High level of marital satisfaction was observed in most of the SAU (83.8%) and Non-SAU (94.1%) teachers and the rest were in average levels. Statistical analysis through ANOVA indicated that there were no main and interactionary effects of university, gender and cadre on marital satisfaction. Positive and significant correlation was observed between family environment and family involvement with marital satisfaction of SAU and Non-SAU teachers. This indicated that the more conducive the family environment the higher the marital satisfaction of both the groups of teachers and vice versa.

Keywords


Family Environment, Involvement, Social Support, Marital Satisfaction.

References