Asian Journal of Home Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Assessment and Analysis of Writing Ability of Undergraduate Students


Affiliations
1 Department of Human Development and Studies, College of Community Science, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (M.S.), India
2 College of Community Science, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (M.S.), India
3 Kakatia e Techno School, Hyderabad (Telangana), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Three hundred UG students were chosen at random from randomly selected 5 Colleges of Parbhani town. For this study purpose, a passage of 12 lines containing 155 words was chosen and individual students were given the printed passage to copy it down while seeing it, in small groups of 10 UG students each, within given time and without time limit. The data related to study was collected from the UG students through structured cum open ended questionnaire, SES scale, by administering IQ test, GQ assessment and non-participatory observation technique. For the analysis of writing ability, the parameters considered were number of words, positioning of letters, placement of words, spacing between words, shape and appearance of the words from the given written passage and were rated on the five point scale i.e. Excellent, Very good, Good, Fair and Poor through the subjective evaluation.

Keywords

Writing Ability, Under Graduate Students, Educational Background.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Bhise, C.D. and Desetty, R.V. (2000). Common writing errors of elementary school children and their background. M.Sc. Thesis, Vasathrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani.

  • Burdick, Massey C.L. and Gambrell, L.B. (2013). Measuring students’ writing ability on a computer- analytic development scale. Literacy Research & Instruction, 53: 101–103.

  • Kingston, P.T., Shanmugam, K., Selvaraj, R., Aanad, R. and Bharamitharan, R. (2000). Problems in writing disability among the school Children. http://sitemaker.umich.edu/

  • Malhotra, S., Rajender, G., Sharma, V., Singh, T.B. and Bhatia, M.S. (2009). Neuro-Cognitive Functioning in Children with Learning Difficulties. Psychiatry J. Delhi., 12 (2).

  • Rindermann, H., Michou, C.D. and Thompson, J. (2011). Childrens’ writing ability: Effects of parental education, mental speed and intelligence. J. Learning & Individual Differences, 21 (5): 562–568.

  • Samantha, W.B., Skibbe, L.E. and Hindman, A. (2014).Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29(4) : 614-624.

  • Tansley and Panckhurst (1981). Cited by Grinnell P. C., Teaching the learning disabled : A longitude development approach., 255.


Abstract Views: 372

PDF Views: 0




  • Assessment and Analysis of Writing Ability of Undergraduate Students

Abstract Views: 372  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Veena Bhalerao
Department of Human Development and Studies, College of Community Science, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (M.S.), India
Vishala Patnam
College of Community Science, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (M.S.), India
Snehali Madrap
Kakatia e Techno School, Hyderabad (Telangana), India

Abstract


Three hundred UG students were chosen at random from randomly selected 5 Colleges of Parbhani town. For this study purpose, a passage of 12 lines containing 155 words was chosen and individual students were given the printed passage to copy it down while seeing it, in small groups of 10 UG students each, within given time and without time limit. The data related to study was collected from the UG students through structured cum open ended questionnaire, SES scale, by administering IQ test, GQ assessment and non-participatory observation technique. For the analysis of writing ability, the parameters considered were number of words, positioning of letters, placement of words, spacing between words, shape and appearance of the words from the given written passage and were rated on the five point scale i.e. Excellent, Very good, Good, Fair and Poor through the subjective evaluation.

Keywords


Writing Ability, Under Graduate Students, Educational Background.

References