Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Association between Stress and Behavioural Problems among Sophomores


Affiliations
1 Department of Human Development, College of Rural Home-science, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Psychology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This study was conducted to compare between the students of I and II PUC on stressful life events and behavioural problems and to know the association between stressful life events and behavioural problems among students of I and II PUC. The sample consisted of 416 pre-university students of both PUC I (N=223) and PUC II (N=193) age ranged from 16 years to 19 years drawn using random sampling method from five colleges of Bidar city. This was an ex-post facto research design. Stressful life events schedule (Biradar, 2007) and Revised Behavioural Problems Scale (Quay and Peterson, 1986) was administered on the students of pre-university courses. The data was subjected to't' test and Karl Pearson's co-efficient correlation analysis. The results revealed that both PUC I and II year students had developed more or less similar level of stress in family relations, peer relations, academic, physical health, psychological aspects and overall stress. Correspondingly they had developed similar level of conduct disorder, socialized aggression, attention problem, anxiety withdrawal and psychotic behaviour problems. The results also revealed that there was significant positive relationship between stressful life events and behaviour problems among sophomores (I and II PUC students).

Keywords

Stress, Behavioural Problems, Sophomores
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Aneshensel, C.S. (1992). Social stress: Theory and Research. Ann. Rev.Soicol.,18: 15-38.
  • Arnett, J.J. (1994). Are collect students adults ? their conception of the transition to adulthood. J. Adult Develop.,7: 213-224.
  • Barnes, G.M. (2006). Effects of parental monitoring and peer deviance on substance use and Delin quency. J. Marriage &Family, 68: 1084-1104.
  • Biradar, Gayatri (2007). Stressful life events and behavioural problems among pre-university students. M.H.Sc.Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, KARNATAKA (INDIA).
  • Cause, A.M. (1996). Social support during adolescence methodological and theoretical considerations. In: K. Hurrelmann and Hamilton S.F. (Eds.) Social problems and social contexts in adolescence : Prospectus across boundaries, pp.131-152.
  • Cohen, S. and Gordon, L.U. (1995). Strategies for measuring stress in studies of psychiatric and physical disorders. In: S. Cohen, R.D. Kessler and Gordon, L.U. (Eds.)Measuring stress: A guide for health and social scientists, Oxford University Press, NEW YORK pp.3-28.
  • Deater-Deckard, K. (1998). Multiple risk factors in the development of externalizing behaviour problems : group and individual differences. Develop. & Psychopathol., 10: 469-493.
  • DuBois, D.L. (1992). A prospective study of life stress, social support and adapation in early adolescence. Child Develop., 63: 542-557.
  • Erikson, E.H. (1968). Identify, youth and crisis, NEW YORK, NORTON.
  • Garhammer, M. (2002). Pace of life and enjoyment of life. J. Happiness Studies, 3: 217-256.
  • Gerard, J.M. and Buehler, C. (1999). Multiple risk factors in family environment and youth problem behaviour. J. Marriage & Family, 61: 343-361.
  • Gerard, J.M. and Buhehler, C. (2004). Cumulative environmental risk and youth problem behaviour. J. Marriage & Family. 66: 702- 720.
  • Jackson, Y. and Warren, J.S. (2000). Appraisal, social supports and life events; predicting outcome behaviour in school-age children. Child Develop., 71: 1441-1457.
  • Kessler, R.C. (1997). Childhood adversity and adult psychopathology. In: I. H. Gotlib and B. Wheaton (Eds.) Stress and adversity over the life course: Trajectories and turning points, Cambridge Univ. Press., NEW YORK, U.S.A.
  • Lazarus, R.S. and Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping, Springer, NEW YORK pp.579-605.
  • Mischel, H.N. (1974). Sex bias in the evolution of professional achievement. J.Edu. Psychol., 66: 157-166.
  • Penny, J.S., Jo-Tina Kim, Osorio, S. and Vilhjalmsottir, P. (2005). Autonomy and relatedness in adolescent parent disagreements : ethnic and developmental factors. J. Adolescent Res., 20(1): 8-39.
  • Quay, H.C. and Peterson, D.R. (1986). Revised behaviour problem chicklist. Psychological Assess. Res.
  • Rawson, H.E., Bloomer, K. and Kendall, A. (2001). Stress, anxiety, Depression and physical illness in college students. J. Genetic Psychol., 155: 321-330.
  • Reddy, S.V., Kotoshwari Balu, V. and Ruo Tirumala, T.(2005). Sources of stress among adolescents. J. Comm. Guidance & Res., 22(2): 127-138.
  • Sameroff, A.J. (1998). Family and social influences on the development of child competence. In:M. Lewis and C. Feiring (Eds.) Fmailies, Risk & Camp.
  • Shaffer, L.F. and Shoben, E.L. (1956). The psychology of adjustment, Boston : Houghton.
  • Verma, S. and Joyeeta, G. (1990). Some aspects of high academic stress and symptoms. J. Personality & Clinical Studies, 6(1): 7-12.
  • Wanger, B.M., Choen Patricia and Brook, J.S. (1996). Parent/ adolescent relationships moderators of the effects of stressful life events. J. Adolescent Res., 11(3): 347-374.
  • Wanger, B.M. and Compas, B.E. (1990). Gender, instrumentality and expressivity : moderators of the relation between stress and psychological symptoms during adolescence. American J. Comm. Psychol., 18: 383-406.

Abstract Views: 230

PDF Views: 0




  • Association between Stress and Behavioural Problems among Sophomores

Abstract Views: 230  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Gayatri Biradar
Department of Human Development, College of Rural Home-science, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, India
V. S. Yadav
Department of Psychology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, India

Abstract


This study was conducted to compare between the students of I and II PUC on stressful life events and behavioural problems and to know the association between stressful life events and behavioural problems among students of I and II PUC. The sample consisted of 416 pre-university students of both PUC I (N=223) and PUC II (N=193) age ranged from 16 years to 19 years drawn using random sampling method from five colleges of Bidar city. This was an ex-post facto research design. Stressful life events schedule (Biradar, 2007) and Revised Behavioural Problems Scale (Quay and Peterson, 1986) was administered on the students of pre-university courses. The data was subjected to't' test and Karl Pearson's co-efficient correlation analysis. The results revealed that both PUC I and II year students had developed more or less similar level of stress in family relations, peer relations, academic, physical health, psychological aspects and overall stress. Correspondingly they had developed similar level of conduct disorder, socialized aggression, attention problem, anxiety withdrawal and psychotic behaviour problems. The results also revealed that there was significant positive relationship between stressful life events and behaviour problems among sophomores (I and II PUC students).

Keywords


Stress, Behavioural Problems, Sophomores

References