Asian Journal of Home Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Body Composition in Relation to Economic Status Among Adult Females


Affiliations
1 Department of Foods and Nutrition, College of Home Science, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar (Uttarakhand), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This cross-sectional nature of research investigation consists of assessing nutritional status and body composition of 629 young women in the age range of 18-28 years. Mean BMI and waist hip ratio was revealed 20.3±3.4 and 0.83±0.05, respectively. Fat per cent showed an increasing trend in accordance with income slab. A decreasing trend was observed for fat free mass (%) and total body water (%) in relation to income range. Mean observations for fat (%) have been found to be 21.27±6.55, 22.74±6.77 and 23.91±6.86 at three corresponding income ranges. FFM (%) and fat (%) had significant difference (p<0.01) at 1 per cent level for the groups viz., low income group-middle income group and middle income group-high income group. Anthropometric characteristics such as weight, BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference, triceps, biceps, sub-scapular and sum of skin fold thickness had rising trend with advancing income ranges while height, MUAC, WHR and supra-iliac revealed no such trend. Waist circumference showed to have significant difference (p<0.05) at 5 per cent level for the groups viz., low income group-middle income group and low income group-high income group. Waist hip ratio revealed significant difference (p<0.05) at 5 per cent level for the group low income group-middle income group.

Keywords

Nutritional Status, Body Composition, Economic Status, Adult Females.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Anonymous (2005). Applied Economic Research's Market Information Survey of Households (2005). National Council of Applied Economic Research, NEW DELHI, INDIA.

  • Aranceta, J. (2003). Community nutrition. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr., 57: 79-81.

  • Bowman, S.A. (2007). Low economic status is associated with suboptimal intakes of nutritious fruits by adults in the national health and nutrition examination survey 1999-2002. Nutr. Res., 27 (9) : 515-523.

  • Brochu, M., Starling, R.D., Tchernof, A., Matthews, D.E., Garcia-Rubi, E. and Poehlman, E.T. (2000). Visceral adipose tissue is an independent correlate of glucose disposal in older obese postmenopausal women. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 85 (7) : 2378-2384.

  • Chumlea, W.C. and Guo, S. (1994). Bioelectrical impedance and body composition: present status and future direction-reply. Nutr. Rev., 52 : 323-325.

  • Ferro-Luzzi, A., Sette, S., Franklin, M. and James, W.P.T. (1992). A simplified approach of assessing adult chronic deficiency. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr., 46 (3) : 173-186.

  • Ghosh, J.R. and Bandyopadhyay, A.R. (2006). Income, birth order, siblings, and anthropometry. Hum Biol., 78(6) : 733-741.

  • Gibson, R.S. (1990). Principles of nutritional assessment. New York. Oxford University Press, 153-195 pp.

  • Jebb, S.A. and Elia, M. (1993). Techniques for the measurement of body composition: a practical guide. Internat. J. Obes., 17 (11) : 611-621.

  • Khongsdier, R. (2002). Body mass index and morbidity in adult males of the War Khasi in Northeast India. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr., 56 (6) : 484-489.

  • Lukaski, H., Bolonchuk, W., Hall, C. and Siders, W. (1986). Validation of tetrapolar bioelectrical impedance method to assess human body composition. J. Appl. Physiol., 60 (4) : 1327-1332.

  • Lukaski, H., Johnson, P., Bolonchuk, W. and Lykken, G. (1985). Assessment of fat-free mass using bioelectrical impedance measurements of the human body. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 41 (4) : 810-817.

  • Molarius, A. and Seidell, J.C. (1998). Selection of anthropometric indicators for classification of abdominal fatness-a critical review. Internat. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord., 22 (8) : 719-727.

  • National Institute of Health (1996). Bioelectrical impedance analysis in body composition measurement: National Institute of Health Technology Assessment Conference Statement. American J. Clin. Nutr., 64 : 524-532.

  • Nub, M., Asens Okyere, W.K. and Van Den Bloom, G.J.M. (1998). Body mass index as an indicator of standard of living in developing countries. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr., 52 (2) : 136-144.

  • Passmore, R. and Eastwood, M.A. (1979). In : Davidson and passmore, Human nutrition and diatetics (8th Ed.) ELBS, Churchill Livingstone. U.K.

  • Prentice, A.M and Jebb, S.A. (2001). Fast foods, energy density and obesity: A possible mechanistic link. Obesity Reviews, 4 (4) : 187-194.

  • Rao, N.P., Ramnath, T. and Gowrinath, S.J. (1986). Diet and nutrition in urban areas. Proc. Nutr. Soc. India, 32 : 1-9.

  • Shetty, P.S. and James, W.P.T. (1994). Body mass index: a measure of chronic energy deficiency in adults. Food and nutrition. Paper No. 56 Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome.

  • Weisell, R.C. (2002). Body mass index as an indicator of obesity. Asia Pacific J. Clin. Nutr., 11 : 681-684.


Abstract Views: 436

PDF Views: 2




  • Body Composition in Relation to Economic Status Among Adult Females

Abstract Views: 436  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Priyanka Singhal
Department of Foods and Nutrition, College of Home Science, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar (Uttarakhand), India
Rita Singh Raghuvanshi
Department of Foods and Nutrition, College of Home Science, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar (Uttarakhand), India

Abstract


This cross-sectional nature of research investigation consists of assessing nutritional status and body composition of 629 young women in the age range of 18-28 years. Mean BMI and waist hip ratio was revealed 20.3±3.4 and 0.83±0.05, respectively. Fat per cent showed an increasing trend in accordance with income slab. A decreasing trend was observed for fat free mass (%) and total body water (%) in relation to income range. Mean observations for fat (%) have been found to be 21.27±6.55, 22.74±6.77 and 23.91±6.86 at three corresponding income ranges. FFM (%) and fat (%) had significant difference (p<0.01) at 1 per cent level for the groups viz., low income group-middle income group and middle income group-high income group. Anthropometric characteristics such as weight, BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference, triceps, biceps, sub-scapular and sum of skin fold thickness had rising trend with advancing income ranges while height, MUAC, WHR and supra-iliac revealed no such trend. Waist circumference showed to have significant difference (p<0.05) at 5 per cent level for the groups viz., low income group-middle income group and low income group-high income group. Waist hip ratio revealed significant difference (p<0.05) at 5 per cent level for the group low income group-middle income group.

Keywords


Nutritional Status, Body Composition, Economic Status, Adult Females.

References