Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Performance Evaluation of Public Sector Banks with Reference to 'CAMEL Model' for the Period of 2006-2013


Affiliations
1 Indira Institute of Business Management, Sanpada, Navi-Mumbai, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


A 'CAMEL' is basically a ratio based model for evaluating the performance of banks. It is a management tool that measures capital adequacy, asset quality and efficiency of management, quality of earnings and liquidity position of Banks. In the present study, the financial performance of the public sector banks is measured and compared to ascertain which bank work efficiently. All the banks were first individually ranked based on the sub-parameters of each parameter. The sum of these ranks is then taken to arrive at the group average of individual banks for each parameter. Final the composite rankings for the banks were arrived at after computing the average of these group averages. Banks were ranked in the ascending/descending order based on the individual sub-parameter. Economic development of any country is mainly influenced by the growth of the banking industry in that country. The overall performance table in the study clearly shows that the Bank of Baroda is ranked at top position, followed by Indian Bank, Andhra Bank, Punjab National Bank, Syndicate Bank, Bank of India.

Keywords

Banking Supervision, Capital Adequacy, Asset Quality, Management Efficiency, Earning Quality, Liquidity, Financial Performance.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Zumwalt, K. (2002). The Changing Relationship Between CAMEL Ratings and Bank Soundness during the Indonesian Banking Crisis. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 19(3), 247-260
  • Kapil, S. and Kapil, K, N, (2005). CAEL's Ratings and its Correlation to Pricing Stocks - An Analysis of Indian Banks. University Journal of Bank Management, 4(1), 64-78.
  • Singh, D., and Kohli, G. (2006). Evaluation of Private Sector Banks in India: A SWOT Analysis. Journal of Management Research, 6(2), 84-101.
  • Gupta, R. (2008). A CAMEL Model Analysis of Private Sector Banks in India. Journal of Gyan Management, 2(1), 3-8.
  • Satish D, Jutur Sharath and Surender V Indian Banking Performance and Development 2004-05, Chartered Financial Analyst, 11 (10), 6-15.
  • Derviz, A., and Podpiera, J. (2008). Predicting Bank CAMEL and SandP Ratings: The Case of the Czech Republic. Emerging Markets, Finance and Trade, 44(1), 117.

Abstract Views: 680

PDF Views: 2




  • Performance Evaluation of Public Sector Banks with Reference to 'CAMEL Model' for the Period of 2006-2013

Abstract Views: 680  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Shailaja P. Yadav
Indira Institute of Business Management, Sanpada, Navi-Mumbai, India

Abstract


A 'CAMEL' is basically a ratio based model for evaluating the performance of banks. It is a management tool that measures capital adequacy, asset quality and efficiency of management, quality of earnings and liquidity position of Banks. In the present study, the financial performance of the public sector banks is measured and compared to ascertain which bank work efficiently. All the banks were first individually ranked based on the sub-parameters of each parameter. The sum of these ranks is then taken to arrive at the group average of individual banks for each parameter. Final the composite rankings for the banks were arrived at after computing the average of these group averages. Banks were ranked in the ascending/descending order based on the individual sub-parameter. Economic development of any country is mainly influenced by the growth of the banking industry in that country. The overall performance table in the study clearly shows that the Bank of Baroda is ranked at top position, followed by Indian Bank, Andhra Bank, Punjab National Bank, Syndicate Bank, Bank of India.

Keywords


Banking Supervision, Capital Adequacy, Asset Quality, Management Efficiency, Earning Quality, Liquidity, Financial Performance.

References