An Asian Journal of Soil Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Effect of Nutrient Management Approaches on Maximizing Productivity, Nutrient Uptake, Soil Fertility and Economics of Maize (Zea mays L.)-Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Cropping Sequence


Affiliations
1 Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur (Karnataka), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Present investigation was conducted during Kharif and Rabi seasons of 2013-14 and 2014-15 at ARS, Raddewadagi, dist. Kalaburagi, UAS, Raichur, Karnataka to study the effect of nutrient management approaches on maximizing productivity, nutrient uptake, soil fertility and economics of maize-chickpea cropping sequence. Application of nutrients through SSNM for targeted yield of 7.0 or 8.0 t ha-1 recorded significantly higher growth attributes, yield and yield attributes and uptake of N, P2O5 and K2O in maize-chickpea cropping system as compared to farmers practice, RDF and STL method. However, it was at par with STCR approach targeted yield of 7 or 8.0 t ha-1. Organic carbon content was non-significant in maize-chickpea sequence cropping system. However, significantly higher available N, P2O5 and K2O (301.05, 62.93 and 439.38 kg ha-1, respectively) were noticed with nutrients applied through 125 per cent SSNM approach for targeted yield of 8.0 t ha-1 as compared to absolute control, farmers practice, state recommendation, STL method and 125 per cent SSNM approach for targeted yield of 7.0 t ha-1 after harvest of second crop in maize-chickpea sequence cropping system and it was on par with SSNM or STCR approach for targeted yield of 7.0 or 8.0 t ha-1. The cost of cultivation of maize-chickpea sequence was higher (Rs. 50,542 ha-1) with nutrients applied through 125 per cent SSNM approach for targeted yield of 8.0 t ha-1. However, the higher maize-equivalent yield, gross returns, net returns and BC ratio (19083 kg ha-1, Rs.2,53,985, Rs. 2,04,279 ha-1 and 5.11, respectively) could be achieved in SSNM approach targeted yield of 8.0 t ha-1 followed by STCR approach targeted yield of 8.0 t ha-1 (18751 kg ha-1, Rs. 2,49,360, Rs. 1,99,828 ha-1 and 5.03, respectively) in maize-chickpea sequence cropping system.

Keywords

Targeted Yield, Productivity, Nutrient Uptake, Soil Fertility, Economics.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Al Zubaidi, A.H. and Al Semak, K. (1992). Interactive effect of soil salinity and potassium fertilizer on the growth and salt tolerance of corn. J. Agric. Res., 2(1): 10-27.

  • Anonymous (2007). STCR an approach for fertilizer recommendations based on targetted yield concept. Tec. Bultn., AICRP on STCR. University of Agricultural Sciences Bangalore (KARNATAKA) INDIA.

  • Bangarwa, A.S., Kairon, M.S. and Singh, K.P. (1989). Effect of plant population and nitrogen application on yield and economics of winter maize. Indian J. Agron., 34(4): 393-395.

  • Biradar, Ashok and Jayadeva, H.M. (2013). Influence of targeted yield approach on yield, yield attributes, nutrient uptake and economics of maize. Madras Agric. J., 100(1-3): 146-149.

  • Biradar, Ashok, Jayadeva, H.M., Shakaralingappa, B.C. and Vishwanath, A.P. (2013). Effect of targeted yield approach on growth, yield and nutrient uptake at flowering of maize.Mysore J. Agric. Sci., 47(4): 707-712.

  • Biradar, D.P., Aladakatti, Y.R., Rao, T.N. and Tiwari, K.N. (2006). Site-specific nutrient management for maximization of crop yields in Northern Karnataka. Better Crops, 90(3): 33-35.

  • Chandel, Bandana Singh, Singh, Sandeep, Singh, Harvendra and Singh, Vinay (2014). Direct and residual effect of nutrient management in wheat-maize cropping sequence. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 62(2): 126-130.

  • Chaudhary, R.K., Patel, T.D., Patel, J.B. and Patel, R.H. (1998). Response of chickpea cultivars to irrigation, nitrogen and phosphorus on sandy clay loam soil. Int. Chickpea, Pigeonpea Newslett., 5: 24-26.

  • Dhillon, N.S., Brar, B.S., Benipal, D.S. and Mavi, M.S. (2006). Economics of various soil test based fertilization approaches for different crops. Crop Res., 32(3): 377-381.

  • Doberman, A., Witt, C., Robert, P.C. and Larson, W.E. (2000). SSNM concept for irrigated via system. Proc. of 5th International Con. on Presis, 25: 1-7.

  • Gawai, P.P. and Pawar, V.S. (2005). Production, potential and economics of sorghum-chickpea cropping sequence under irrigated nutrient management system. Crop Res., 30(3): 345-348.

  • Jackson, M.L. (1973). Soil chemical analysis, Prentice Hall of India (Pvt) Ltd., NEW DELHI, INDIA.

  • Jayaprakash, T.C., Nagalikar, V.P., Pujari, B.T. and Setty, R.A. (2006). Effect of organics and inorganics on growth and yield of maize under irrigation. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 18(3): 798.

  • Kumar, A., Majumdar, K., Jat, M.L., Pampolino, N., Kamboj, B.R., Bishnoi, D.K., Kumar, V. and Johnston, A.M. (2012). Evaluation of nutrient expert for wheat. Better Crops South Asia., 27-29.

  • Madhusudhan (2013). Assessment of soil test based nutrient management approaches in maize (Zea mays L.). M. Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur, KARNATAKA (INDIA).

  • Mandal, M.K., Pati, R., Mukhopadhyay, D. and Majumdar, K. (2009). Maximizing yield of cowpea through soil test-based nutrient application in Terai Alluvial soils. Better Crops, 3(1): 28-30.

  • Piper, C.S. (1966). Soil and plant analysis. Hans Publisher, Bombay (M.S.) INDIA.

  • Rajashekara, R., Wani, S.P., Sahrawat, K.L. and Pardhasaradhi (2010). Integrated nutrient management to enhance on-farm productivity of rainfed maize in India. Int. J. Soil Sci., 5(4): 216-224.

  • Singh, A.K., Bhatti, B.P., Sundaram, P.K., Kumar, Santosh, Bahrati, R.C., Naresh, C. and Rai, Mathura (2012). Study of site specific nutrients management of cowpea seed production and their effect on soil nutrient status. J. Indian. Agril. Sci., 4(10): 191-198.

  • Singh, J., Bajaj, J.C. and Pathak, H. (2005). Quantitative estimation of fertilizer requirement for maize and chickpea in the alluvial soil of the Indo-Gangetic plains. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 53(1): 101-106.

  • Singh, Surendra and Sarkar, A.K. (2001). Balanced use of major nutrients for sustaining higher productivity of maize-wheat cropping system in acidic soils of Jharkhand. Indian J. Agron., 46(4): 605-610.

  • Sonar, K.R., Kumbhar, D.D., Patil, B.P., Shinde, S.S., Wandre, S.S. and Zende, G.K. (1982). Fertilizer requirements for yield targeting of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) based on soil test values. J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ.,7(1): 4-6.

  • Subbiah, B.V. and Asija, G.L. (1956). A rapid procedure for the estimation of the available nitrogen in soil. Curr. Sci., 25(8): 259-260.

  • Thakur, D.R., Prakash, B.M., Kharwar, P.C. and Bhalla, S.K. (1998). Effect of nitrogen and plant spacing on yield, nitrogen uptake and economics in baby corn (Zea mays). Indian J. Agron., 43(4): 668-671.

  • Tomar, S., Suresh and Timari, A.S. (1990). Production potential and economics of different cropping sequences. Indian J. Agron., 35: 30-35.

  • Umesh, M.R. (2008). Investigation on balanced fertilization for maize-pigeon pea cropping sequence in Alfisols of Karnataka. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences Bangalore, KARNATAKA (INDIA).

  • Umesh, M.R., Manjunatha, N., Shankar, M.A. and Jagadeesha, N. (2014). Influence of nutrient supply levels on yield, nutrient uptake, grain quality and economics of corn (Zea mays L.) in Alfisols of Karnataka. Indian J. Dryland Agric. Res. & Dev., 29(1): 73-78.

  • Varalakshmi, L.R., Srinivasamurthy, C.A. and Bhasakar, S. (2005). Effect of integrated use of organic manures and inorganic fertilizers on organic carbon, available N, P and K in sustaining productivity of groundnut-finger millet cropping system. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 53(8): 315-318.

  • Vidyavathi, Dasog, G.S., Babalad, H.B., Hebsur, N.S., Gali, S.K., Patil, S.G. and Alagawadi, A.R. (2011). Influence of nutrient management practices on crop response and economics in different cropping systems in a Vertisol. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 24(4): 455-460.

  • Yadhav, K.S. and Nand, Hira (2004). Site specific nutrient management for optimal food grain production in Haryana. Better Crops Int., 88(2): 21-22.


Abstract Views: 383

PDF Views: 1




  • Effect of Nutrient Management Approaches on Maximizing Productivity, Nutrient Uptake, Soil Fertility and Economics of Maize (Zea mays L.)-Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Cropping Sequence

Abstract Views: 383  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

B. V. Shreenivas
Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur (Karnataka), India
M. V. Ravi
Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur (Karnataka), India
H. S. Latha
Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur (Karnataka), India

Abstract


Present investigation was conducted during Kharif and Rabi seasons of 2013-14 and 2014-15 at ARS, Raddewadagi, dist. Kalaburagi, UAS, Raichur, Karnataka to study the effect of nutrient management approaches on maximizing productivity, nutrient uptake, soil fertility and economics of maize-chickpea cropping sequence. Application of nutrients through SSNM for targeted yield of 7.0 or 8.0 t ha-1 recorded significantly higher growth attributes, yield and yield attributes and uptake of N, P2O5 and K2O in maize-chickpea cropping system as compared to farmers practice, RDF and STL method. However, it was at par with STCR approach targeted yield of 7 or 8.0 t ha-1. Organic carbon content was non-significant in maize-chickpea sequence cropping system. However, significantly higher available N, P2O5 and K2O (301.05, 62.93 and 439.38 kg ha-1, respectively) were noticed with nutrients applied through 125 per cent SSNM approach for targeted yield of 8.0 t ha-1 as compared to absolute control, farmers practice, state recommendation, STL method and 125 per cent SSNM approach for targeted yield of 7.0 t ha-1 after harvest of second crop in maize-chickpea sequence cropping system and it was on par with SSNM or STCR approach for targeted yield of 7.0 or 8.0 t ha-1. The cost of cultivation of maize-chickpea sequence was higher (Rs. 50,542 ha-1) with nutrients applied through 125 per cent SSNM approach for targeted yield of 8.0 t ha-1. However, the higher maize-equivalent yield, gross returns, net returns and BC ratio (19083 kg ha-1, Rs.2,53,985, Rs. 2,04,279 ha-1 and 5.11, respectively) could be achieved in SSNM approach targeted yield of 8.0 t ha-1 followed by STCR approach targeted yield of 8.0 t ha-1 (18751 kg ha-1, Rs. 2,49,360, Rs. 1,99,828 ha-1 and 5.03, respectively) in maize-chickpea sequence cropping system.

Keywords


Targeted Yield, Productivity, Nutrient Uptake, Soil Fertility, Economics.

References