Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Heavy Metal Contamination in Soils Surrounding Mandideep Industrial Area, Madhya Pradesh
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Soil contamination in vicinity of industrial establishments due to release and accumulation of heavy metals has been a major concern for last few decades. The main objective of present research was to study the status of heavy metal contamination in the industrial area of Mandideep. The Mandideep being the largest industrial area of Madhya Pradesh in India was selected for present investigation. Mandideep is located between N 23°04' longitude and E 077°31' latitude with an elevation of 1496 m above MSL. The representative soil samples were collected from ten different locations and subjected to laboratory analysis for determination of total and available concentration of seven important heavy metals viz., Pb, Zn, Cr, Cu, Ni, As and Cd. Four acid digestion and DTPA extraction methods were used to digest and extract the total and available form of heavy metal from sample, respectively. The heavy metal concentrations from digest and extractant were estimated by using ICP-OES instrument. In the present study it reveals that the heavy metals concentration is at the nearby maximum level. The results showed that all heavy metal viz., Pb, Zn, Cr, Cu, Ni, As and Cd concentrations in soils surrounding the industrial area of Mandeep found in higher concentrations at all the sampling locations. The concentrations of total lead, copper, chromium, zinc, cadmium, arsenic and nickel varied from 26.6 to 143.9 mg kg-1, 81.0 to 361.0 mg kg-1, 53.0 to 462.0 mg kg-1, 80.1 to 1200.0 mg kg-1, 3.0 to 23.2 mg kg-1, 15.1 to 48.6 mg kg-1 and 84.3 to 260.7 mg kg-1, respectively whereas available lead level ranged between 1.2-4.9 mg kg-1, copper varied from 2.7 to 25.5 mg kg-1, chromium occurred in range from 0.018 to 0.052 mg kg-1, whereas zinc found in range from 7.4 to 71.6 mg kg-1, cadmium level ranged from 0.158 to 0.418 mg kg-1, arsenic varied from 0.008 to 0.021 mg kg-1 and nickel was found in a range from 0.275 to 5.952 mg kg-1. In conclusion, the soil in the vicinity of Mandideep industrial area is severely contaminated with heavy metals released and accumulated from the industrial operations.
Keywords
Heavy Metal Contamination, Soil Pollution.
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
User
Font Size
Information
- Ahmad, M.S.A., Hussain, M., Saddiq, R. and Alvi, A.K. (2007). Mungbean: A nickel indicator, accumulator or excluder? Bull. Environ. Contamin. & Toxicol., 78: 319-324.
- Anuratha, A. (2006). Assesment of heavy metal pollution in the industrial site of Coimbatore. J. Eco Toxicol. & Environ. Monitor., 16: 13-17.
- Bansal, O.P. (2004). Uptake of heavy metals by crop plants. Pollu. Res., 23: 501-506.
- Blume, H.P. and Brummer, G. (1991). Prediction of heavy metal behavior in soil by means of simple field tests. Ecotoxicol. & Environ. Safety, 22: 164-174.
- Edgell, K. (1988). USEPA method study 37-SW-846 method 3050 acid digestion of sediments, sludges and soils. EPA Contract No. 68-03-3254, November 1988.
- Govil, K.P. (2001). Distribution and characterization of heavy metals in Jeedimetla industrial area Andra Pradesh, India. Pollu. Res., 20: 245-255.
- Gowda, N.K.S, Malathi, V.S., Jash, S. and Roy, K.S. (2003). Status of pollutants and trace elements in water, soil, vegetation and dairy animals in industrial area of Bangalore. Indian J. Dairy Sci., 56: 86-90.
- Lindsay, W.L. and Norvell, W.A. (1978).Development of DTPA test for Fe, Zn, Mn and Cu. Soil Sci. Soci. America J., 42: 421-428.
- Markert, B. (1993). Plants as biomonitors, indicators for heavy metals in the terrestrial environments. VCH Publishers.
- Paiva, L.B., Oliveira, J.G., de Azevedo, Ribeiro, R.A., Silva, D.R., Da, M.G. and Vitoria, A.P. (2009). Ecophysiological responses of water hyacinth exposed to Cr3+ and Cr6+. Environ. Exp. Bot., 65: 403-409.
- Parkpian, P.S.,Hing, T.L., Laortanakul, P. and Thunthaisong, N. (2003). Regional monitoring of lead and cadmium contamination in a tropical grazing land site, Thailand. Environ. Monitor. & Assess., 85: 157-173.
- Sanita, di Toppi L. and Gabbrielli, R. (1999). Response to cadmium in higher plants. Environ.l Exp. Bot., 41: 105-130.
- Singh, R., Randhawa, S.S. and Randhawa, C.S. (2003). Trace element status of crossbred cattle from sub-mountainous belt of Punjab in relation to soil and fodder. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 73: 1072-1076.
- Sujatha, S.D., Sathyanarayanan, S., Satish, P.N. and Nagaraju, D. (2001). A sewage and sludge treated lake and its impact on the environment Mysore. Indian J. Environ. Geol., 40: 1209-1213.
- Tiller, K.G. (1989). Heavy metals in soil and their environmental significance. Adv. Soil Sci., 9: 113-142.
- U.S.EPA (2000). National primary drinking water regulations, arsenic and clarifications to compliance and new source contaminants monitoring, proposed rule. Federal Register, 65(121): 38888. http://www.epa.gov/safewater/ars/arsenic.pdf.
- Walkley, A. and Black, I.A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci., 37: 29-38.
Abstract Views: 343
PDF Views: 1