An Asian Journal of Soil Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Impact of Conservational Agriculture on Hydrological Properties of Rainfed Alfisol


Affiliations
1 College of Agriculture (U.A.S.), Bheemarayanagudi (Karnataka), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Retention and movement of water was better in conservational agricultural systems as compared to conventional agricultural system. Statistical tool Tukey test suggested that conservational agricultural systems that too raised bed with retention of crop residue at soil surface recorded statistically significant available water, water held at field capacity and permanent wilting point over that of conventional agricultural system and however, another statistical tool Pearson correlation indicated that neither tillage, crop residue retention at surface nor raised bed influenced water retention characteristics of soil such as MWHC, AW, water at FC and PWP which were significantly correlated with particle size class rather than organic carbon the resultant product of management factors. Other hydrological properties of soil such as infiltration rate, water storage capacity as well as hydraulic conductivity were better in conservational agricultural systems than in conventional agricultural system and however, infiltration rate and hydraulic conductivity were significantly superior in no tilled soil with raised bed and crop residue retained at soil surface.

Keywords

Available Water, Infiltration Rate, Hydraulic Conductivity, Reduced Tillage, Crop Residue Retention.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Baruah, T.C. and Barthakur, H.P. (1998). A text book of soil analysis, Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd, NEW DELHI, INDIA.

  • Bernard, A., Keen and Henry, Razkowski (1921). The relation between the clay content and certain physical properties of a soil. J. Agric. Sci., 11: 441-449.

  • Bescansa, P., Imaz, M.J., Virto, I., Enrique, A. and Hoogmoed, W.B. (2006). Soil water retention as affected by tillage and residue management in semiarid Spain. Soil Tillage Res., 87: 19-27.

  • Black, C.A. (1965). Methods of soil analysis. Canadian. J. Soil Sci., 62: 595-597.

  • Ehlers, W. and Van der Ploeg, R.R. (1976). Evaporation, drainage and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of tilled and untilled fallow soil. Z. Pflanzenern. Bodenk, 3: 373-386.

  • Eynard, A., Schumacher, T.E., Lindstrom, M.J. and Maio, D.D. (2004). Porosity and pore-size distribution in cultivated Ustolls and Usterts. Soil Sci. Soc. America. J., 68: 1927-1934.

  • Godwin, R.J. (1990). Agricultural engineering in development tillage for crop production in areas of low rainfall. FAO, Rome, Italy, pp.124.

  • Hong, S.Y., Minasny, B., Han, K.H., Kim, Y. and Lee, K. (2013). Predicting and mapping soil available water capacity in Korea, Peer. J., 1: 71.

  • Khurshid, K., Iqbal, M., Arif, M.S. and Nawaz, A. (2006). Effect of tillage and mulch on soil physical properties and growth of maize. Internat. J. Agric. Biol., 8: 593-596.

  • Lal, R. and Shukla, M.J. (2004). Principles of soil physics. Marcel Dekker, NEWYORK, U.S.A.

  • Liebig, M. A., Tanaka, D.L. and Wienhold, B.J. (2004). Tillage and cropping effects on soil quality indicators in the northern Great Plains. Soil Tillage Res., 78: 131-141.

  • McGarry, D., Bridge, B.J. and Radford, B.J. (2000). Contrasting soil physical properties after zero and traditional tillage of an alluvial soil in the semi-arid subtropics. Soil Tillage Res., 53: 105-115.

  • Mupangwa, W., Twomlow, S., Walker, S. and Hove, L. (2007). Effect of minimum tillage and mulching on maize (Zea mays L.) yield and water content of clayey and sandy soils. Phys. Chem. Earth, 32: 1127-1134.

  • Norwood, D. (1994). Profile water distribution and grain yield as affected by cropping system and tillage. Agron. J., 86: 558-563.

  • Richards, L. A. (1954). Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Agric. Handbook, No. 60, USDA Washington, D. C., 166.

  • Sharratt, B., Zhang, M.C. and Sparrow, S. (2006). Twenty years of conservation tillage research in subarctic Alaska - II. Impact on soil hydraulic properties. Soil Tillage Res., 91: 82-88.

  • Walkley, A.J. and Black, C.A. (1934). Estimation of soil organic carbon by the chromic acid and titration method. Soil Sci., 37: 29-38.


Abstract Views: 331

PDF Views: 1




  • Impact of Conservational Agriculture on Hydrological Properties of Rainfed Alfisol

Abstract Views: 331  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

R. Bheemanna
College of Agriculture (U.A.S.), Bheemarayanagudi (Karnataka), India
H. V. Rudramurthy
College of Agriculture (U.A.S.), Bheemarayanagudi (Karnataka), India
P. H. Kuchnur
College of Agriculture (U.A.S.), Bheemarayanagudi (Karnataka), India
Chandragouda Girigoudar
College of Agriculture (U.A.S.), Bheemarayanagudi (Karnataka), India

Abstract


Retention and movement of water was better in conservational agricultural systems as compared to conventional agricultural system. Statistical tool Tukey test suggested that conservational agricultural systems that too raised bed with retention of crop residue at soil surface recorded statistically significant available water, water held at field capacity and permanent wilting point over that of conventional agricultural system and however, another statistical tool Pearson correlation indicated that neither tillage, crop residue retention at surface nor raised bed influenced water retention characteristics of soil such as MWHC, AW, water at FC and PWP which were significantly correlated with particle size class rather than organic carbon the resultant product of management factors. Other hydrological properties of soil such as infiltration rate, water storage capacity as well as hydraulic conductivity were better in conservational agricultural systems than in conventional agricultural system and however, infiltration rate and hydraulic conductivity were significantly superior in no tilled soil with raised bed and crop residue retained at soil surface.

Keywords


Available Water, Infiltration Rate, Hydraulic Conductivity, Reduced Tillage, Crop Residue Retention.

References