Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Dynamics of Marriage and Female Labour Participation:Case of India


Affiliations
1 Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai 400063, India
2 Centre for Development Studies, Trivandrum, Kerala, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Using nationally representative data for 2011-2012, the paper explores the dynamics of marriage and female labour participation in India. The findings suggest that rural married females have significantly higher chances of seeking work compared with unmarried females. However, the relationship is found to be negative for urban married females. Married females are more likely to get work in both urban and rural areas, implying the prevalence of statistical discrimination in employing unmarried females. Educated married females have higher probability of seeking work, implying that higher education can offset the traditional obstacles leading to higher work participation.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Arrow, K.J. (1972), Models of Job Discrimination in Racial Discrimination, in Pascal, A.H. (Ed.), Economic Life, D.C. Heath, Lexington, MA, pp. 83-102.
  • Azam, K. (2012), The Impact of Indian Job Guarantee Scheme on Labor Market Outcomes: Evidence from a Natural Experiment, IZA Working Paper, DP No. 6548.
  • Becker, G.S. (1965), A Theory of the Allocation of Time, The Economic Journal, 75(299): 493-517.
  • Bhat, M.P.N. and F. Zavier (1999), Findings of National Family Health Survey: Regional Analysis, Economic and Political Weekly, 34(42/43): 3008-3032.
  • Bose, A. (1991), Demographic Diversity of India-1991 Census, State and District Level Data, B.R. Publishing Corporation, Delhi
  • Cameron, A.C. and P.K. Trivedi (2005), Micro-econometrics: Methods and Applications, Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • Chakraborty, I. and A. Chakraborty (2009), Female Work Participation and Gender Differential in Earning in West Bengal, Institute of Development Studies Kolkata, Occasional Paper 18.
  • Das, Upasak (2015), Does Political Activism and Affiliation Affect Allocation of Benefits in the Rural Employment Guarantee Program: Evidence from West Bengal, India, World Development, 67: 202-217.
  • Deshpande, A. (2011), The Grammar of Caste, Oxford University Press, New Delhi
  • Dev, S.M. (2011), NREGS and Child Well Being, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, Working Paper 2011-004.
  • Faridi, M.Z., I.S. Chaudhry, and M. Anwar (2009), The Socio-Economic and Demographic Determinants of Women Work Participation in Pakistan: Evidence from Bahawalpur District, South Asian Studies, 24(2).
  • Ferber, M.A. (1982), Labour Market Participation of Young Married Women: Causes and Effects, Journal of Marriage and Family, 44(2): 457-468.
  • Heckman, J.J. (1979), Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error, Econometrica, 47(1): 153-61.
  • Hoddinot, J. and L. Haddad (1995), Does Female Income Share Influence Household Expenditures? Evidence from Cote d’Ivorie, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 57(1): 77-96.
  • Khera, R and N. Nayak (2009), Women Workers and Perceptions of the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Economic and Political Weekly, 44(43): 49-57.
  • Mazumdar, I. and N. Neetha (2011), Gender Dimensions: Employment Trends in India, 1993-94 to 2009-10, Economic and Political Weekly, 46(43): 118-126.
  • Mincer, J. (1962), Labour Force Participation of Married Women, in H.G. Lewis (Ed.), Aspects of Labour Economics, National Bureau of Economic Research, Princeton University Press, Princeton N.J.
  • Narayanan, S. and U. Das (2014), Women Participation and Rationing in the Employment Guarantee Scheme, Economic and Political Weekly, 48(46): 46-53.
  • Phelps, E.S. (1972), The Statistical Theory of Racism and Sexism, American Economic Review, 62(4): 659-661.
  • Phillips, S.A. and P.S. Burton (1998), What's Mine is Yours? The Influence of Male and Female Incomes on Patterns of Household Expenditure, Economica, 65(260): 593-613.
  • Powers, E.T. (2003), Children's Health and Maternal Work Activity: Static and Dynamic Estimates under Alternative Disability Definitions, Journal of Human Resources, 38(3): 522–556.
  • Rangarajan, C., Kaul, P.I. and Seema (2011), Where is the Missing Labour Force, Economic and Political Weekly, 46(39): 68-72.
  • Sanso, P.V. (2000), Masculinity, Male Domestic Authority and Female Labour Participation in South India, The European Journal of Development Research, 12(2): 179-198.
  • Singh, A. (2011), Inequality of Opportunity in Indian Children: The Case of Immunization and Nutrition, Population Research and Policy Review, 30(6): 861-883.
  • Singh, A., U. Das and T. Agarwal (2013), How Inclusive Has Regular Employment Been in India? A Dynamic View, The European Journal of Development Research, 25(3): 486-494
  • Smith, S.W. (1994), Labour Economics, Routledge, London.
  • Sorensen, A. (1983), Women’s Employment Patterns after Marriage, Journal of Marriage and Family, 45(2), 311-321.

Abstract Views: 418

PDF Views: 0




  • Dynamics of Marriage and Female Labour Participation:Case of India

Abstract Views: 418  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Rajnish Kumar
Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai 400063, India
Upasak Das
Centre for Development Studies, Trivandrum, Kerala, India

Abstract


Using nationally representative data for 2011-2012, the paper explores the dynamics of marriage and female labour participation in India. The findings suggest that rural married females have significantly higher chances of seeking work compared with unmarried females. However, the relationship is found to be negative for urban married females. Married females are more likely to get work in both urban and rural areas, implying the prevalence of statistical discrimination in employing unmarried females. Educated married females have higher probability of seeking work, implying that higher education can offset the traditional obstacles leading to higher work participation.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.21648/arthavij%2F2015%2Fv57%2Fi2%2F100395