Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Imperative Indian Administrative Reforms:An Impossible Agenda?


Affiliations
1 Maharashtra, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Administrative reform is a global phenomenon. In India, however administrative reform is still not a critical political agenda with its complete understanding, holistic perspective and sense of urgency. The paper studies reforms undertaken by India after its independence, and shows how and why it failed to reform its administration. Formation of strong autonomous local democratic governments, breaking of bureaucracy, sector specific dovetailing of the New Public Management and post- NPM principles are leading towards such administrative reforms. The paper demonstrates how the world over, countries reformed their administration successfully, and which contributed to their development. India, even though administrative functioning is a bottleneck in its progress, has failed to recognize it as a critical national agenda. Existing bureaucratic structure and lack of political ideology and commitment towards administrative reforms are the reasons for failure to reform administration.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Aberbach, Joel and Tom Christensen (2001), Radical Reforms in New Zealand: Crisis, Window of Opportunity and Rational Actors, Public Administration, 79(2): 403-422.
  • Bale, Malcom and Tony Dale (1998), Public Sector Reform in New Zealand and Its Relevance to Developing Countries, The World Bank Research Observer, 13(1): 103-121.
  • Caiden, Gerald E. (1991), Administrative Reforms, in Farazmand, Ali (Eds.), Handbook of Comparative and Development Public Administration, Marcel Dekker Inc, New York.
  • Cheung, Anthony (2005), The Politics of Administrative Reforms in Asia: Paradigms and Legacies, Paths and Diversities, Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 18(2).
  • Choudhary, Kameshwar (Ed.) (2007), Globalization, Governance Reforms and Development in India, Sage, New Delhi.
  • Corbridge, Stuart, Glyn Williams, Manoj Srivastava, and Veron Rene (2005), Seeing the State: Government and Governmentality in India, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K.
  • Dunleavy, Patrick and Christopher Hood (1994), From Old Public Administration to New Public Management, Public Money and Management, July-September.
  • Dunleavy, Patrick, Helen Margetts, Simon Bastow and Jane Tinkler (2001), New Public Management Is Dead—Long Live Digital-Era Governance, Public Administration, 79: 403-422.
  • Durant, Roberts (1998), Agenda Setting, the "Third Wave," and the Administrative State, Administration and Society, 30(3): 211
  • Esman, Milton (1991), The State, Government Bureaucracies and Their Alternatives, in Farazmand, Ali (Ed.), Handbook of Comparative and Development Public Administration, Marcel Dekker Inc, New York.
  • Hood, Christopher (1991), A Public Management For All Seasons?, Public Administration, 69(Spring): 3-19.
  • ---------- (1995), The “New Public Management” in The 1980s: Variations in a Theme', Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 20(U3): 93-109.
  • Ingraham, Patricia (1997), Play It Again, Sam; It's Still Not Right: Searching for the Right Notes, Administrative Reform, Public Administration Review, Jul/Aug97, 57(4): 325-333.
  • Ingraham, Patricia and Barbara Romzek (1994), New Paradigms for Government, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California.
  • Jain, R.B. (2001), Towards Good Governance: A Half Century of India's Administrative Development, International Journal of Public Administration, 24(12): 1299-1334.
  • Kaufman, Robert (1996), The Politics of State Reforms: A Review of Theoretical Approaches, paper presented at the Centre for Advanced Studies in Social Sciences, the Juan March Institute, Madrid, on May 17, 1996
  • Kelman, Steven, Fred Thompson, L. R. Jones, Kuno Schedler (2003), Dialogue on Definition and Evolution of the Field of Public Administration, International Public Management Review, 4(2).
  • Kettl, Donald F. (2005), The Global Public Management Revolution, Brookline Institution, Washington D.C.
  • Khan, Mohammad (2002), Resistance to administrative Reforms in South Asian Civil Bureaucracies, in Farazmand, Ali (Ed.), Administrative Reforms in Developing Nations, Greenwood, Westport CT.
  • Kilby, Patrick (2004), Is Empowerment Possible Under a New Public Management Environment? Some Lessons from India, International Public Management Journal, 7(2).
  • Maheshwari, S.R. (2004), Administrative Reforms in India: Past, Present and Future Prospects, Occasional Paper No. 4, Centre for Policy Research, New Delhi.
  • Malcolm Bale and Tony Dale Source (1998), Public Sector Reform in New Zealand and Its Relevance to Developing Countries, The World Bank Research Observer, 13(1): 103-121.
  • Moon Myung-Jae and Ingraham Patricia (1998), Shaping Administrative Reforms and Governance: An examination of the Political Nexus Triads in three Asian Countries., Governance, An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 11(1): 77-100.
  • Nair K.G.R. (2004), Economic Reforms And Regional Disparities in Economic and Social Development in India, Planning Commission of the Government of India, New Delhi, http://planningcommission.gov.in/reports/sereport/ser/stdy_errd.pdf
  • Olsen, Johan and Peters Guy (1996), Lessons from Experience: Experential Learning in Administrative Reforms in Eight Democracies, Scandanavian University Press, Stockholm.
  • Osborne, David and Gaebler Ted (1992), Reinventing Government, Addison-Wesley Reading, MA.
  • Peters Guy B. and Donald Savoie (1998), Taking Stock: Assessing Public Sector Reforms, McGillQueen University Press, Montreal.
  • Peters, Guy B. (1998), Governance without Government? Rethinking Public Administration, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2): 223-243.
  • Polidano, Charles, (1999), The New Public Management in Developing Countries, IDPM Public Policy and Management Working Paper No. 13, November 1999.
  • Pritchett, Lant (2007), Is India a Flailing State? Detours on the Four Lane Highway to Modernization, Paper presented in the conference “Rule and Reform in the Giants” at Harvard University in November 2007.
  • Roy, K.C. and C.A. Tisdell (1998), Good Governance in Sustainable Development: The Impact of Institutions, International Journal of Social Economics, 25(6/7/8): 1310.
  • Sarker, Abu Elias (2006), New public management in developing countries: An analysis of success and failure with particular reference to Singapore and Bangladesh, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(2): 180–203.
  • Singh, Amita (2005), Administrative Reforms: Towards Sustainable Practices, Sage, New Delhi.
  • Tummala, Krishna (2002), Administrative Reforms in India, in Farazmand, Ali (Ed.), Administrative Reforms in Developing Nations, Greenwood, Westport CT.
  • http://arc.gov.in/
  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_administration#cite_note-12
  • http://www.ipmr.net
  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Public_Management
  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Public_Management
  • http://righttoinformation.gov.in/

Abstract Views: 533

PDF Views: 0




  • Imperative Indian Administrative Reforms:An Impossible Agenda?

Abstract Views: 533  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Sanjay Chahande
Maharashtra, India

Abstract


Administrative reform is a global phenomenon. In India, however administrative reform is still not a critical political agenda with its complete understanding, holistic perspective and sense of urgency. The paper studies reforms undertaken by India after its independence, and shows how and why it failed to reform its administration. Formation of strong autonomous local democratic governments, breaking of bureaucracy, sector specific dovetailing of the New Public Management and post- NPM principles are leading towards such administrative reforms. The paper demonstrates how the world over, countries reformed their administration successfully, and which contributed to their development. India, even though administrative functioning is a bottleneck in its progress, has failed to recognize it as a critical national agenda. Existing bureaucratic structure and lack of political ideology and commitment towards administrative reforms are the reasons for failure to reform administration.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.21648/arthavij%2F2015%2Fv57%2Fi3%2F109153