Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Impact of Revival Package on Short-Term Rural Cooperative Credit Structure (STCCS) in India


Affiliations
1 Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Pune 411004, Maharashtra, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The revival package of Central Government provided financial assistance to short term cooperative credit structure, which works with a three tier system. Before revival package, PACS closely worked with second tier (i.e. with DCCBs). But PACS are now delinked in Bihar from second tier and allowed to function independently, whereas in other study states PACS still play an important role, but function independently. This revival package was worked out and implemented from 2007 on the recommendation of Vaidyanathan Committee. Under package, the State Government has to its Co-operative Acts and rules, while each tier of cooperative has to amend and adopt new bye-laws and CAS, etc., that all complied with by each tier. NPA, CRAR, ROA, recovery percentage and business per employee slowly improved in the first tier (i.e. SCB) and second tier in Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka, whereas in Bihar and Maharashtra, they require to work hard further. Financial positions of PACS have not improved much as expected by the Government as recovery percentage is slowly improving. Since the cadre post was abolished for PACS, a majority of PACS failed to appoint secretaries from their own funds.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

Abstract Views: 576

PDF Views: 0




  • Impact of Revival Package on Short-Term Rural Cooperative Credit Structure (STCCS) in India

Abstract Views: 576  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Kailas C. Thaware
Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Pune 411004, Maharashtra, India

Abstract


The revival package of Central Government provided financial assistance to short term cooperative credit structure, which works with a three tier system. Before revival package, PACS closely worked with second tier (i.e. with DCCBs). But PACS are now delinked in Bihar from second tier and allowed to function independently, whereas in other study states PACS still play an important role, but function independently. This revival package was worked out and implemented from 2007 on the recommendation of Vaidyanathan Committee. Under package, the State Government has to its Co-operative Acts and rules, while each tier of cooperative has to amend and adopt new bye-laws and CAS, etc., that all complied with by each tier. NPA, CRAR, ROA, recovery percentage and business per employee slowly improved in the first tier (i.e. SCB) and second tier in Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka, whereas in Bihar and Maharashtra, they require to work hard further. Financial positions of PACS have not improved much as expected by the Government as recovery percentage is slowly improving. Since the cadre post was abolished for PACS, a majority of PACS failed to appoint secretaries from their own funds.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.21648/arthavij%2F2014%2Fv56%2Fi2%2F111212