Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Power to the People? Decentralisation in India and Indonesia


Affiliations
1 Department of Economic History, Lund University, Sweden
2 Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Pune, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Decentralisation is considered a potentially effective strategy for participatory development and delivery of assistance, particularly in the context of rural development. It contributes to reduction of inequality and poverty and, thus, promotes local democracy. India and Indonesia have considerable social and economic inequality and poverty. Though both countries have opted for devolving power to local governments, they differ in their approaches. India went in for 'gradualist approach' emphasizing Panchayati Raj Institution, whereas Indonesia chose 'big bang approach' emphasizing the ideology of svadaya gotong royong (community self-help). This has resulted in a more efficient delivery of public services in Indonesia, but at the cost of democratic freedom. In both the countries there is an urgent need to improve the mechanisms for adequate and equitable fiscal transfers, thus enabling the poorer regions to fully utilize their growth potential. This would have a positive impact on poverty.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

Abstract Views: 510

PDF Views: 1




  • Power to the People? Decentralisation in India and Indonesia

Abstract Views: 510  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Neelambar Hatti
Department of Economic History, Lund University, Sweden
Sheetal Sonawane
Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Pune, India

Abstract


Decentralisation is considered a potentially effective strategy for participatory development and delivery of assistance, particularly in the context of rural development. It contributes to reduction of inequality and poverty and, thus, promotes local democracy. India and Indonesia have considerable social and economic inequality and poverty. Though both countries have opted for devolving power to local governments, they differ in their approaches. India went in for 'gradualist approach' emphasizing Panchayati Raj Institution, whereas Indonesia chose 'big bang approach' emphasizing the ideology of svadaya gotong royong (community self-help). This has resulted in a more efficient delivery of public services in Indonesia, but at the cost of democratic freedom. In both the countries there is an urgent need to improve the mechanisms for adequate and equitable fiscal transfers, thus enabling the poorer regions to fully utilize their growth potential. This would have a positive impact on poverty.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.21648/arthavij%2F2010%2Fv52%2Fi3%2F115325