Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Poverty in India since 1983: New Poverty Counts and Robust Poverty Comparisons


Affiliations
1 North Eastern Hill University, Shillong, India
2 University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This is the third in a set of papers discussing Poverty Lines (PL) and poverty aggregates in India published in this journal (Dubey and Palmer-Jones, 2005a; 2005b. In earlier papers we criticised the Unit Value based CPIs and the method of computing PLs from these UV CPIs which have been proposed as an improvement over the official CPIs used to compute PLs and poverty by the Indian Planning Commission (PC) (Deaton and Tarrozi, 1999; Deaton, 2003a). We proposed some improvements but noted remaining lacunae. In this paper we report these PLs and the poverty aggregates we have calculated from them (without adjustment to the 55th Round).
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

Abstract Views: 471

PDF Views: 1




  • Poverty in India since 1983: New Poverty Counts and Robust Poverty Comparisons

Abstract Views: 471  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Amaresh Dubey
North Eastern Hill University, Shillong, India
Palmer-Jones Richard
University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom

Abstract


This is the third in a set of papers discussing Poverty Lines (PL) and poverty aggregates in India published in this journal (Dubey and Palmer-Jones, 2005a; 2005b. In earlier papers we criticised the Unit Value based CPIs and the method of computing PLs from these UV CPIs which have been proposed as an improvement over the official CPIs used to compute PLs and poverty by the Indian Planning Commission (PC) (Deaton and Tarrozi, 1999; Deaton, 2003a). We proposed some improvements but noted remaining lacunae. In this paper we report these PLs and the poverty aggregates we have calculated from them (without adjustment to the 55th Round).


DOI: https://doi.org/10.21648/arthavij%2F2005%2Fv47%2Fi3-4%2F115701