Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Limitations and Data Gaps at Village and Block Levels on Welfare Schemes of Rural Poor Households


Affiliations
1 Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Deccan Gymkhana, Pune 411004, Maharashtra, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


There are limitations and data gaps at village and block levels on welfare schemes of rural poor households. Data is an important input to measure the impact of a scheme. However, the government offices did not collect statistics on welfare schemes. So, it is difficult to assess actual impact of particular schemes on poor households. No data are available at taluka and block levels in respect of important socio-economic indicators such as quality education, per capita income, poverty ratio, monthly expenditure, life expectancy, infant mortality, etc. Two conclusions can be drawn. Firstly, the record keeping system is not well established and not a part of system or practice. Secondly, the government functionaries were hesitant to divulge any details of spending on the schemes. Record keeping system needs to be strengthened to achieve higher impact on the targeted groups and correction of mistakes. Data sets lead researchers to find out the answers of some basic research questions.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Altonji, J.G. and Blank, R.M. (1999), Race and gender in the labour market, In O. Ashenfelter and D. Card (Ed.), Handbook of Labour Economics, Edition 1, Vol. 3, pp. 3143-3259, Elsevier.
  • Antecol, H. and K. Bedard, (2004), The Racial Wage Gap: The Importance of Labour Force Attachment Differences Across Black, Mexican, and White Men, Journal of Human Resources, 39 (2), 564-583.
  • Banerjee, Biswajit and J.B. Knight (1985), Caste Discrimination in Indian Urban Labour Market, Journal of Developing Economics, 17(3): 277–307, April.
  • Cingano, F. (2014), Trends in Income Inequality and its Impact on Economic Growth, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 163, OECD Publishing.
  • Deshpande, Ashwini (2005), Do Markets Discriminate? Some Insights from Economic Theories, pp. 59-65 in Thorat, Aryama, and Negi (Eds.), Reservation and Private Sector: Quest for Equal Opportunity and Growth, Rawat Publishers, New Delhi.
  • ---------- (2011), The Grammar of Caste-Economic Discrimination in Contemporary India, Oxford University Press.
  • Dirks, Nicholas B. (2011), Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Drèze, Jean and Amartya Sen (2013), An Uncertain Glory: India and its Contradictions, Princeton University Press.
  • ---------- (2013a), India Development and Participation, Oxford University Press.
  • Galor, O. and O. Moav (2004), From Physical to Human Capital Accumulation: Inequality and the Process of Development, Review of Economic Studies, 71(4): 1001-1026.
  • Government of India (1991 to 2013), National Crime Records Bureau, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India and various reports on Crimes in Maharashtra, State Crime Records Bureau CID, Maharashtra State.
  • ---------- (2010-11), Agricultural Census, Government of India, New Delhi.
  • ---------- (2011), Census of India, Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India, 2/A, Man Singh Road, New Delhi -110011 (INDIA).
  • Government of Maharashtra (2014-15), Economic Survey of Maharashtra, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Planning Department, Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai.
  • Human Rights Watch (1999), Broken People - Caste Violence against India’s “Untouchables, New York, Washington, London, Brussels.
  • Jain, Monica (2015), India's Struggle against Malnutrition--Is the ICDS Program the Answer?, World Development, March, 67: 72-89.
  • Madheswaran, S. (2004), Caste Discrimination in the Indian Labour Market: An Econometric Analysis, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore.
  • Madheswaran, S. and P. Attewell (2007), Caste Discrimination in the Indian Urban Labour Market: Evidence from the National Sample Survey, Economic and Political Weekly, 42(41): 4146-4153.
  • NCSCST (2004), National Commission for Scheduled Castes and Tribes, Seventh Report 2001-02.
  • Planning Commission (2006), Guidelines for Implementation, Scheduled Caste Sub-plan 2006, New Delhi.
  • Sen, Amartya (2013), Development as Freedom, Oxford University Press.
  • Sharma, Smriti (2015), Caste-based crimes and economic status: Evidence from India, Journal of Comparative Economics, 43(1): 204-226, February.
  • Stiglitz, J. (2012), The Price of Inequality: How Today's Divided Society Endangers Our Future, New York: W.W. Norton.
  • Tendulkar Committee Report (2009), Report of the Expert Group to Review the Methodology for Estimation of Poverty, Planning Commission, New Delhi.
  • Thorat, Sukhadeo and Katherine S. Newman (2010), Blocked by Castes, Economic Discrimination in Modern India, Oxford University Press.
  • Thorat, Sukhadeo and Paul Attewell (2007), The Legacy of Social Exclusion, Economic and Political Weekly, 42(41), October.
  • Thorat, Sukhdeo and Prashant Negi (2007), Exclusion and Discrimination-Civil Rights Violations and Atrocities in Maharashtra, Working Paper Series, Indian Institute of Dalit Studies, II(2): 10.
  • Thorat, Sukhadeo, Pual Rizvi Attewell and Fatima Firdas (2009), Urban Labour Market Discrimination, Working Paper Series, Volume III, November 01, Indian Institute of Dalit Studies, New Delhi.
  • Trivedi, H.V. (1985), Economic Development of Tribes in India, Himanshu Publications, New Delhi.
  • Wankhede, G.G. (2001), Educational Inequalities among Scheduled Castes in Maharashtra, Economic and Political Weekly, 1553-1558, May.
  • World Bank (2011), Perspectives on Poverty in India, Oxford University Press.
  • ----------- (2013), Poverty and Social Exclusion in India, Oxford University Press.

Abstract Views: 570

PDF Views: 0




  • Limitations and Data Gaps at Village and Block Levels on Welfare Schemes of Rural Poor Households

Abstract Views: 570  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Kailas Thaware
Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Deccan Gymkhana, Pune 411004, Maharashtra, India

Abstract


There are limitations and data gaps at village and block levels on welfare schemes of rural poor households. Data is an important input to measure the impact of a scheme. However, the government offices did not collect statistics on welfare schemes. So, it is difficult to assess actual impact of particular schemes on poor households. No data are available at taluka and block levels in respect of important socio-economic indicators such as quality education, per capita income, poverty ratio, monthly expenditure, life expectancy, infant mortality, etc. Two conclusions can be drawn. Firstly, the record keeping system is not well established and not a part of system or practice. Secondly, the government functionaries were hesitant to divulge any details of spending on the schemes. Record keeping system needs to be strengthened to achieve higher impact on the targeted groups and correction of mistakes. Data sets lead researchers to find out the answers of some basic research questions.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.21648/arthavij%2F2016%2Fv58%2Fi3%2F147831