Artha Vijnana: Journal of The Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Public Spending on Technical Education in India:Inter-State Comparison


Affiliations
1 Department of Economics, CM College, LNM University, Darbhanga 846004, Bihar, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The paper examines public spending on technical education in India by both the Centre and the States. The rationale for the same becomes relevant when the economy has been undergoing structural changes over a span of time and the demand pattern for skills of different kinds has changed in different sectors, especially in the manufacturing sector. The study aims to make a comparison in public spending on technical education and its proportion to the Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) among 15 major states from 1991-1992 to 2011-2012 at constant prices. Inter-state comparison perceives that the states of Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, economically and educationally backward, registered a negative growth rate in expenditure on technical education. Empirical results show that per student expenditure has risen appreciably in the 1990s, while after 2001-2002 it declined at both current and real prices. The per student expenditure is lower in the poor states which engrossed consideration toward more public spending in the destitute regions of the nation.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Barro, R.J. and X.S. Martin (1992), Convergence, Journal of Political Economy, 100(2): 223-251.

  • Blom, A. and J. Cheong (2010), Governance of Technical Education in India: Key Issues, Principles, and Case Studies, Working paper no. 190, Washington D.C., World Bank.

  • Chattopadhyay, S. (2007), Exploring Alternative Sources of Financing Higher Education, Economic and Political Weekly, 40(42): 4251-4259.

  • Government of India (1986), National Policy on Education, Ministry of Human Resources Development, Government of India, New Delhi.

  • ---------- (2009), National Knowledge Commission Report to the Nation 2007, Government of India, New Delhi.

  • Groshen, E.L. and S. Potter (2003), Has Structural Change Contributed to Jobless Recovery?, Current Issues in Economics and Finance, 9(8): l-7.

  • Lucas, R.E. (1988), On the Mechanics of Economic Development, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1): 3–42.

  • Maharatna, A. (2014), Invasion of Educational Universe by Neo-liberal Economic Thinking: A Civilization Casualty, Economic and Political Weekly, 49(37), 61-70.

  • Mitra, A. (2015). Public Spending in Higher Education in India: A Benefit Incidence Analysis, Higher Education for the Future, 2(1): 71-91.

  • Musgrave, R.A. (1959), Theory of public finance, McGraw Hill, New York.

  • Prakash, V. (2007), Trend in Growth and Financing of Higher Education in India, Economic and Political Weekly, 42(31): 49-58.

  • Romer, P.M. (1990), Endogenous Technological Change, Journal of Political Economy, 98(5): 71–102.

  • Sanyal, B.C. and M. Martin (2006), Financing Higher Education: International Perspective, Higher Education in the World.

  • Solow, R.M. (1956), A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1): 65-94.

  • Tilak, J.B.G. (1989b), Center-state Relations in Financing Education in India, Comparative Educational Review, 33(4): 450-480.

  • ---------- (1992), Students’ Loans in Financing Higher Education in India, Higher Education, 23(4): 389-404.

  • ---------- (1995), Costs and Financing of Education in India: A Review of Issues, Problems and Prospects, UNDP Research Project, Centre for Development Studies, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala.

  • ---------- (1995a), Funding Higher Education in India Commentary, Economic and Political Weekly, 30(13): 426-429.

  • ---------- (2003), Higher Education and Development, in Handbook on Educational Research in the Asia Pacific Region (Eds. J.P. Kleeves and Ryo Watanabe) Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 809‐826.

  • ---------- (2004), Fee, Autonomy and Equity Commentary, Economic and Political Weekly, 35(9): 870-873.

  • ---------- (2014), Private Higher Education in India, Economic and Political Weekly, 18(40): 32-38.

  • ---------- (2015), How Inclusive is Higher Education in India? Social Change, 45(2): 185-223.

  • Tilak, J.B.G. and K. Biswal (2013), Transition to Higher Education in India, IASSI Quarterly-Contributions to Indian Social Science, 32(4): 1-30.

  • UNESCO (1996), Report to UNESCO to the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century, France.

  • Varghese N.V. and J.B.G. Tilak (1991), The Financing of Education in India, International Institute of Educational Planning, Research Report No. 92, UNISCO, Paris.


Abstract Views: 572

PDF Views: 4




  • Public Spending on Technical Education in India:Inter-State Comparison

Abstract Views: 572  |  PDF Views: 4

Authors

Reena Kumari
Department of Economics, CM College, LNM University, Darbhanga 846004, Bihar, India

Abstract


The paper examines public spending on technical education in India by both the Centre and the States. The rationale for the same becomes relevant when the economy has been undergoing structural changes over a span of time and the demand pattern for skills of different kinds has changed in different sectors, especially in the manufacturing sector. The study aims to make a comparison in public spending on technical education and its proportion to the Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) among 15 major states from 1991-1992 to 2011-2012 at constant prices. Inter-state comparison perceives that the states of Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, economically and educationally backward, registered a negative growth rate in expenditure on technical education. Empirical results show that per student expenditure has risen appreciably in the 1990s, while after 2001-2002 it declined at both current and real prices. The per student expenditure is lower in the poor states which engrossed consideration toward more public spending in the destitute regions of the nation.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.21648/arthavij%2F2017%2Fv59%2Fi3%2F167643