Artha Vijnana: Journal of The Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Poverty and Inequality: Role of Social Protection Programmes in a Backward Region of West Bengal


Affiliations
1 Department of Economics, VidyasagarUniversity, Midnapore 721102, West Bengal, India
2 Department of Economics, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore 721102, West Bengal, India
3 Bhagwanpur High School, Purba Medinipur 721601, West Bengal, India
4 UGC SAP, DRS-I Department ofEconomics, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore 721102, West Bengal, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present paper examines the impact of social protection programmes on poverty and inequality in the backward region of West Bengal. The benefits from social protection programmes (SPPs) have reduced the incidence of poverty to the extent of 3.7 percentage points. It seems that in the case of relatively less poor households, the decreasing rate of poverty gap (PG) and square poverty gap (SPG) are less than in relatively poorer households. That indicates that relatively less poor households are more deprived (especially, double deprived) than relatively more poor households. The benefits of social protection programmes have also reduced the income inequality in both absolute and relative senses. In addition, the income of relatively poorer households has increased to a greater extent than of relatively less poor households. Absolute inequality in the presence of social protection is larger than absolute inequality in its absence. The study suggests that social protection programmes can be used as important tools for reducing inequality in the backward region of West Bengal.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Ambasta, P., P.S.V. Shankar and M. Shah (2008), Two Years of NREGA: The Road Ahead, Economic and Political Weekly, 43(8): 49-50.

  • Barrientos, A. and D. Hulme (Eds.) (2008), Social Protection for the Poor and Poorest: Concepts, Policies and Politics, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.

  • Bose, N. (2017), Raising Consumption through India’s National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, World Development, 96.

  • Dreze, J. (2007), MGNREGA: Dismantling the Contractor Raj, The Hindu, 20th November, 2007.

  • Foster, J., J. Greer, E. Thorbecke (1984), A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures, Econometrica, 52(3): 761–776

  • Gehrke, E. (2017), An Employment Guarantee as Risk Insurance? Assessing the Effects of the NREGS on Agricultural Production Decisions, The World Bank Economic Review.

  • Gini, C. (1936), On the Measure of Concentration with Especial Reference to Income and Wealth, Cowles Commission.

  • Government of India (2012), Press Note on Poverty Estimates, 2009-10, New Delhi: Planning Commission, March 19.

  • Kolm, S-C. (1976), Unequal Inequalities I, Journal of Economic Theory,12 (3): 416-442

  • Kumar, M. (2007), Political Economy of Poverty: A Micro-Level Study, Deep and Deep Publication Pvt. Ltd.

  • Lorenz, M.O. (1905), Methods of Measuring Concentration of Wealth, Journal of American Statistical Association, 9(70): 209-219.

  • Mondal, D. and A. Kayet (2018), Trends and Patterns of CombinedInequality in India: An analysis across Major States from 1983 to 2011-12, Sarvekshana(Journal of National Sample Survey Office, Govt. of India), PDOS 57 XXXIII(3 & 4): 61-83.

  • Nair, K.S., V.K. Tiwari and Sherin Raj (2015), Vouchers for Reproductive and Child Health Services: Demand Side Financing Scheme in Uttarakhand, India, Artha Vijnana, 57(1): 21-36.

  • Nirmala and Yepthomi (2014), Self-Help Groups: A Strategy for Poverty Alleviation in Rural Nagaland, India, International Research Journal of Social Sciences, 3(6): 23-32.

  • Okun, A. (1975), Equality and Efficiency: The Big Tradeoff,Washington, D.C. Brookings Institution.

  • Ostry, Jonathan D., Andrew Berg and Charalambos G. Tsangarides (2014), Redistribution, Inequality and Growth, IMF Staff discussion note SDN 14/02, International Monetary Fund, https://www.imf.org/ external/pubs/ft/sdn/2014/sdn1402.pdf (accessed November 2, 2016).

  • Pathak, Durgesh C. and Srijit Mishra (2013), Poverty in India and Its Decompositions: A Critical Appraisal of the New Method, India Development Report 2012-13, Oxford University Press, New Delhi.

  • Schubert, B. (2005), The Pilot Social Cash Transfer Scheme, Kalomo District, Zambia, Working Paper 52, Chronic Poverty Research Centre, Manchester.

  • Sen, A. (1973), On Economic Inequality, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

  • ---------- (1985), Commodities and Capabilities, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

  • ---------- (1993), Capability and Well-being, In M. Nussbaum and A. Sen (Eds.), The Quality of Life, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  • ---------- (1999), Development as Freedom, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  • Singh, P.K. (2007), NREGA: A New Hope for Rural Employment Generation, Southern Economist, 46(4): 27-31.


Abstract Views: 571

PDF Views: 0




  • Poverty and Inequality: Role of Social Protection Programmes in a Backward Region of West Bengal

Abstract Views: 571  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Debasish Mondal
Department of Economics, VidyasagarUniversity, Midnapore 721102, West Bengal, India
Pinaki Das
Department of Economics, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore 721102, West Bengal, India
Aniruddha Kayet
Bhagwanpur High School, Purba Medinipur 721601, West Bengal, India
Jagabandhu Mandal
UGC SAP, DRS-I Department ofEconomics, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore 721102, West Bengal, India

Abstract


The present paper examines the impact of social protection programmes on poverty and inequality in the backward region of West Bengal. The benefits from social protection programmes (SPPs) have reduced the incidence of poverty to the extent of 3.7 percentage points. It seems that in the case of relatively less poor households, the decreasing rate of poverty gap (PG) and square poverty gap (SPG) are less than in relatively poorer households. That indicates that relatively less poor households are more deprived (especially, double deprived) than relatively more poor households. The benefits of social protection programmes have also reduced the income inequality in both absolute and relative senses. In addition, the income of relatively poorer households has increased to a greater extent than of relatively less poor households. Absolute inequality in the presence of social protection is larger than absolute inequality in its absence. The study suggests that social protection programmes can be used as important tools for reducing inequality in the backward region of West Bengal.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.21648/arthavij%2F2020%2Fv62%2Fi2%2F196366