Atithya: A Journal of Hospitality

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

An Importance - Performance Analysis of Destination Attributes by Women Travellers within the City of Pune


Affiliations
1 AISSMS College of Hotel Management and Catering Technology, Pune (Affiliated to Savitri Bai Phule Pune University), Maharashtra
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


In this paper researcher has used the Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) scheme in order to analyse tourist destination satisfaction from various tourism attributes. On the basis of various service and tourism marketing literatures, the basic components of the destination typically referred to as A’s of tourism were selected and broken down into various micro parameters. The IPA scheme was applied on the responses collected from 100 respondents typically women travellers with in the city of Pune. Although the IPA scheme1 has been used in past research in the tourism field, only a few studies have applied this tool from a destination perspective. Based on the results, the paper concludes with outcomes and conclusions to help in framing the tourism strategy.


Keywords

Destination, Travel Motivations, Attributes, Accessibility, Accommodation, Amenities, Ancillary Services, Comfort, Convenience, Safety, Hygiene, Government Support.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Wilson, E., & Little, D. E. (2005). A relative escape? The impact of constraints on who travel solo. Tourism Review International, 9, 155-175.

  • Collins, D., & Tisdell, C. (2002). Gender and differences in travel life cycles. Journal of Travel Research, 41(2), 133-143.

  • Craik, J. (1997). The culture of tourism. In C. Rojek & J. Urry (Eds.), Touring cultures: Transformations of travel and theory (pp. 113–136). London: Routledge.

  • Crawford, D. W., & Godbey, G. (1987). Reconceptualizing barriers to family leisure. Leisure Sciences, 9, 119-127.

  • Crawford, D. W., Jackson, E. L., & Godbey, G. (1991). A hierarchical model of leisure constraints. Leisure Sciences, 13, 309-320.

  • Davidson, P. (1996). The holiday and work experiences of with young children. Leisure Studies, 15(2), 89-103.

  • Davidson, P., & McKercher, B. (1993). Gender issues and commercial adventure travel: Do commercial opportunities help overcome gender constraints for women? Paper presents to ANZALS inaugural conference, 14-16 April, Brisbane.

  • Dellaert, B. G. C., Ettema, D., & Lindh, C. (1998). Multifaceted tourist travel decisions: A constraintbased conceptual framework to describe tourists’ sequential choices of travel components. Tourism Management, 19(4), 313-320.

  • Denzin, N. K. (1989). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  • Denzin, N. K. (1992). Symbolic interactionism and cultural studies: The politics of interpretation. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Dolan, B. (2001). Ladies of the grand tour. London: Harper Collins. Elsrud, T. (1998). Time creation in traveling: The taking and making of time among backpackers. Time and Society, 7(2), 309-334.

  • Elsrud, T. (2001). Risk creation in traveling: Backpacker adventure narration. Annals of Tourism Research, 28(3), 597–617.

  • Ghose, I. (1998). travelers in colonial India: The power of the women gaze. Delhi: Oxford University.

  • Gibson, H. (2001). Gender in tourism: Theoretical perspectives. In Y. Apostolopoulos, S. Sonmez, & D. J. Timothy (Eds.), as producers and consumers of tourism in developing regions (pp. 19–43). Westport, CT: Praeger.

  • Gibson, H., & Jordan, F. (1998). Shirley Valentine lives! The experiences of solo travelers. Paper presented at the Fifth congress of the World Leisure and Recreation Association, Sao Paulo, Brazil, October 26-30.

  • Gilmartin, P. (1997). The dangers of independent travel: A century of advice for ‘lady travelers.’ Journal of Interdisciplinary Gender Studies, 2(1), 1–13.

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.

  • Henderson, K. A. (1997). A critique of constraints theory: A response. Journal of Leisure Research, 29(4), 453-458.

  • Henderson, K. A. (2000). Gender inclusion as a recreation trend. In W. C. Gartner & D. W. Lime (Eds.), Trends in outdoor recreation, leisure and tourism (pp. 17-27). Oxon, UK: CABI.

  • Hillman, W. (1999). Searching for authenticity in touristic experience: Women backpackers in North Queensland. Unpublished master’s thesis, James Cook University, Queensland.

  • Hinch, T. D., & Jackson, E. L. (2000). Leisure constraints research: Its value as a framework for understanding tourism reasonability. Current Issues in Tourism, 3(2), 87-106.

  • Hudson, S. (2000). The segmentation of potential tourists: Constraint differences between men and. Journal of Travel Research, 38(4), 363-368.

  • Krippendorf, J. (1987). The holiday makers: Understanding the impact of leisure and travel. Oxford: Heinemann Professional.

  • Leiper, N. (2003). Tourism management (2nd ed.). French’s Forest, NSW: Pearson SprintPrint.

  • Lett, J. W. (1983). Ludic and liminoid aspects of charter yacht tourism in the Caribbean. Annals of Tourism Research, 10(1), 35-56. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

  • Little, D. E. (2000). Negotiating adventure recreation: How can access satisfying adventure experiences throughout their lives. Society and Leisure, 23(1), 171-195.

  • Little, D. E. (2002). Women and adventure recreation: Reconstructing leisure constraints and adventure experiences to negotiate continuing participation. Journal of Leisure Research, 34(2), 157-177.

  • Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H. (1995). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis (3rd ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.

  • Searle, M. S., & Jackson, E. L. (1985). Recreation non-participation and barriers to participation: Considerations for the management of recreation delivery systems. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 3, 23-36.

  • Shaw, S. M. (1994). Gender, leisure, and constraint: Towards a framework for the analysis of ’s leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 26(1), 8-22.

  • Shaw, S., Bonen, A., & McCabe, J. F. (1991). Do more constraints mean less leisure? Examining the relationship between constraints and participation. Journal of Leisure Research, 23(4), 286-300.

  • Sheffield, C. J. (1995). Sexual terrorism. In J. Freeman (Ed.), a feminist perspective (5th ed., pp. 1-21). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.


Abstract Views: 319

PDF Views: 1




  • An Importance - Performance Analysis of Destination Attributes by Women Travellers within the City of Pune

Abstract Views: 319  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Shweta Chandra
AISSMS College of Hotel Management and Catering Technology, Pune (Affiliated to Savitri Bai Phule Pune University), Maharashtra

Abstract


In this paper researcher has used the Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) scheme in order to analyse tourist destination satisfaction from various tourism attributes. On the basis of various service and tourism marketing literatures, the basic components of the destination typically referred to as A’s of tourism were selected and broken down into various micro parameters. The IPA scheme was applied on the responses collected from 100 respondents typically women travellers with in the city of Pune. Although the IPA scheme1 has been used in past research in the tourism field, only a few studies have applied this tool from a destination perspective. Based on the results, the paper concludes with outcomes and conclusions to help in framing the tourism strategy.


Keywords


Destination, Travel Motivations, Attributes, Accessibility, Accommodation, Amenities, Ancillary Services, Comfort, Convenience, Safety, Hygiene, Government Support.

References