Agriculture Update

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Association of Personal, Social and Economic Attributes of Farmers on Demonstrated Groundnut Production Technology


Affiliations
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (J.A.U.), Nana-Kandhasar (Chotila), Surendranagar (Gujarat), India
2 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (J.A.U.), Nanakandhasar (Chotila), Surendranagar (Gujarat), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present study was conducted in 4 villages of Banaskantha district of Gujarat to know personal, social and economic characteristics of the beneficiary and non-beneficiary farmers of demonstrated groundnut production technology. Results revealed that maximum number of the respondents from beneficiary and non-beneficiary groups were middle aged (47.14% and 51.43%) and having primary education (37.14% and 47.14%). Majority respondents from beneficiary and nonbeneficiary farmers were medium size of family (65.71% and 71.43%) and social participation with membership in one organization (48.57% and 55.71%). There was non-significant difference between beneficiary and non-beneficiary farmers with respect to their age, education and size of family. Maximum number of respondents from beneficiary and non-beneficiary groups had semi-medium farm size (44.29% and 48.57%), medium annual income (80.00% and 82.86%) and had medium market orientation (70.00% and 60.00%). Social participation, size of farm, annual income and market orientation were found to be significant indicating there was significant difference between beneficiary and non-beneficiary farmers.

Keywords

Groundnut Production Technology, Front Line Demonstration, Socio-Economic Analysis.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Chhodavadia, H.C. (2001). Impact of front line demonstration on groundnut-pigeon pea relay cropping system in Saurashtra region of Gujarat state.M.Sc.(Ag.) Thesis, Gujarat Agricultural University, Junagadh, GUJARAT (INDIA).

  • Hadiya, Bharat and Deshmukh, Girish (2014). Study on personal, socio-economic, communication, situational characteristics and constraints of adopting recommended practices of Kharif groundnut growers in Saurashtra zone of Gujarat. Internat. J. Home Sci. Extn. & Comm. Manage., 1 (2): 80-86.

  • Kanani, P.R. (1998). Indigenous practices of groundnut cultivation followed by the farmers of South Saurashtra Zone in Gujarat state. Ph.D. (Ag.) Thesis, Gujarat Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar, GUJARAT (INDIA).

  • Kosambi, S.R. (1997). A study of technological gap in summer groundnut cultivation in Panchmahal district of Gujarat state. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Gujarat Agricultural University, Anand, GUJARAT (INDIA).

  • Pareek, U. and Trivedi, G. (1965). Factors analysis of socioeconomics status of farmers in India, Rural Sociol., 30: 311-321.

  • Patel, B.M. (1995). Impact of front line demonstration on groundnut growers’ knowledge, adoption and yield with respect to groundnut production technology. Ph.D. Thesis, Gujarat Agricultural University, Junagadh, GUJARAT (INDIA).

  • Patel, V.M. (2005). A study on adoption of Kharif groundnut production technology by the farmers of Sabarkantha district of Gujarat state. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar, GUJARAT (INDIA).

  • Pokar, M.V., Javia, R.M., Sapara, G.K. and Solanki, K.D. (2014). Adoption of improved groundnut production technology under front line demonstration. Agric. Update, 9(2): 186-189.

  • Prajapati, M.R. (1993). Socio-economic impact of social forestry programme on beneficiaries in Kheda district of Gujarat state. Ph.D. Thesis, Gujarat Agricultural University, Anand, GUJARAT (INDIA).

  • Prajapati, R.S. (2006). Impact of front line demonstrations on knowledge and adoption of improved pulse production technology by the farmers of North Gujarat. Ph.D. (Ag.) Thesis, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar, GUJARAT (INDIA).

  • Samanta, R.K. (1977). A study of some agro-economic, sociopsychological and communication variables associated with repayment behaviour of agricultural credit users of Nationalized Bank. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Agricultural Extension, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Nadia,W. B. (INDIA).

  • Solanki, K.D. (2002). Entrepreneurial behaviour of potato growers of North Gujarat Agro-climatic Zone of Gujarat state. Ph. D. Thesis, Gujarat Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar, GUJARAT (INDIA).

  • Vijayaraghavan, K. (1977). A critical analysis of functioning of integrated dry land agricultural development project. M.Sc.(Ag.) Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, T. N. (INDIA).


Abstract Views: 422

PDF Views: 0




  • Association of Personal, Social and Economic Attributes of Farmers on Demonstrated Groundnut Production Technology

Abstract Views: 422  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

M. V. Pokar
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (J.A.U.), Nana-Kandhasar (Chotila), Surendranagar (Gujarat), India
R. M. Javia
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (J.A.U.), Nanakandhasar (Chotila), Surendranagar (Gujarat), India
B. C. Bochaliya
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (J.A.U.), Nana-Kandhasar (Chotila), Surendranagar (Gujarat), India

Abstract


The present study was conducted in 4 villages of Banaskantha district of Gujarat to know personal, social and economic characteristics of the beneficiary and non-beneficiary farmers of demonstrated groundnut production technology. Results revealed that maximum number of the respondents from beneficiary and non-beneficiary groups were middle aged (47.14% and 51.43%) and having primary education (37.14% and 47.14%). Majority respondents from beneficiary and nonbeneficiary farmers were medium size of family (65.71% and 71.43%) and social participation with membership in one organization (48.57% and 55.71%). There was non-significant difference between beneficiary and non-beneficiary farmers with respect to their age, education and size of family. Maximum number of respondents from beneficiary and non-beneficiary groups had semi-medium farm size (44.29% and 48.57%), medium annual income (80.00% and 82.86%) and had medium market orientation (70.00% and 60.00%). Social participation, size of farm, annual income and market orientation were found to be significant indicating there was significant difference between beneficiary and non-beneficiary farmers.

Keywords


Groundnut Production Technology, Front Line Demonstration, Socio-Economic Analysis.

References