Agriculture Update

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Adoption of Recommended Interventions of Wheat among the Respondents of RKVY


Affiliations
1 Department of Extension Education, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agricultural University, Udaipur (Rajasthan), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present study was conducted in which two tribal (Jhadol and Sarada) and two non-tribal (Bhinder and Mavli) panchayat samities of Udaipur district of Rajasthan. Four beneficiary villages and two non-beneficiary villages from each selected panchayat samiti were taken and 10 respondents were selected randomly from each selected village for the study. Data were collected through pre-structured interview schedule. The findings revealed that majority of beneficiary and non-beneficiary farmers belonged to medium adoption group. It was found that there was a significant difference in level of adoption between beneficiary and non-beneficiary farmers about recommended wheat interventions.

Keywords

Adoption, Interventions, Demonstration, Seed Minikits, Beneficiary Respondents, Non-Beneficiary Respondents, RKVY.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Geengar, H.K. (2006). Knowledge and adoption of maize production technology by the tribal and non-tribal farmers in Jahazpur Panchayat Samities of Bhilwara district (Raj.). M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner, RAJASTHAN (INDIA).

  • Gupta, B.S., Tiwari, K.P., Thomas, M. and Singh, N.K. (2004). Status of niger production technology demonstrated in the Maikal range of Satpura hills. Compendium on 2nd National Extension Education Congress, May 22-24, 2004, Society of Extension Education Agra and Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, Rajasthan. pp. 35-36.

  • Kothari, A. (2000). Knowledge and adoption of post harvest technology (PHT) related to food grain of wheat and maize among the cultivators of zone IV-A of Rajasthan. Ph.D. Thesis, Maharana Pratap University of Agricultural and Technology, Udaipur, RAJASTHAN (INDIA).

  • Kumar, R. (2012). Effectiveness of National Food Security Mission in relation to recommended interventions of wheat crop in Udaipur District of Rajasthan. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, RAJASTHAN (INDIA)..

  • Patel, A.J. and Tanwar, M.A. (2004). Evaluation of front line demonstrations on groundnut. Gujrat J. Extn. Edu., 15: 77-78.

  • Saharan, H. and Pundhir, G.S. (2004). Krishi Vigyan Kendra Sardarshahar: Vision and Impact: A chapter under section 2nd of book published by Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Sardarshahar. pp. 126-136.

  • Samota, S.D. (2011). Evaluation of NAIP with special reference to interventions introduced in wheat cultivation in Banswara district of Rajasthan. M.Sc. Thesis, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, RAJASTHAN (INDIA).

  • Solanki, D. (2001). Impact of Central Sector Scheme “Women in agriculture” on empowerment of farm women of Udaipur district of Rajasthan. Ph.D.(Ag.) Thesis, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, RAJASTHAN (INDIA).


Abstract Views: 240

PDF Views: 0




  • Adoption of Recommended Interventions of Wheat among the Respondents of RKVY

Abstract Views: 240  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Sunita Kumari
Department of Extension Education, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agricultural University, Udaipur (Rajasthan), India
F. L. Sharma
Department of Extension Education, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agricultural University, Udaipur (Rajasthan), India

Abstract


The present study was conducted in which two tribal (Jhadol and Sarada) and two non-tribal (Bhinder and Mavli) panchayat samities of Udaipur district of Rajasthan. Four beneficiary villages and two non-beneficiary villages from each selected panchayat samiti were taken and 10 respondents were selected randomly from each selected village for the study. Data were collected through pre-structured interview schedule. The findings revealed that majority of beneficiary and non-beneficiary farmers belonged to medium adoption group. It was found that there was a significant difference in level of adoption between beneficiary and non-beneficiary farmers about recommended wheat interventions.

Keywords


Adoption, Interventions, Demonstration, Seed Minikits, Beneficiary Respondents, Non-Beneficiary Respondents, RKVY.

References