Agriculture Update

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Effectiveness of NAIP in Strengths of NAIP with Special Reference to Livestock Based IFS Interventions among the Tribal Beneficiaries


Affiliations
1 Department of Extension Education, RCA Campus, Surajpal, Udaipur (Rajasthan), India
2 Department of Extension Education, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur (Rajasthan), India
3 Department of Agriculture Statistics and Computer Application, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur (Rajasthan), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Six year ambitious agricultural research Programme was launched in India on 6th July, 2006, which is known as National Agricultural Innovation Project (NAIP), the project focused on innovations in agricultural technology. Four districts of Rajasthan viz., Udaipur, Banswara, Dungarpur and Sirohi figure prominently as the disadvantaged districts identified by the planning commission, based on income, tribal population, their resources, state of agriculture, etc. Keeping in view the challenges of food and nutritional security, National Agricultural Innovation consortia project was initiated by the ICAR in MPUAT, Udaipur. The NAIP was implemented in four districts of southern Rajasthan state viz., Banswara, Dungarpur, Sirohi and Udaipur. Two clusters of Dungarpur district were selected for the present study. These were (a) Faloj and (b) Bichhiwara. Total 10 villages out of 15 villages (under NAIP) were selected proportionately on random basis for inclusion in the study. Total size of sample was of 104 respondents. It was found the strengths that 95 (91.35 %) of the farmers were of their face values expressing strengths of NAIP with moderate extent. Negligible respondents 5 (4.81 %) and 4 (3.84 %) could be observed falling under high and low strengths of NAIP, respectively. Furthermore, data clearly show strong aspects of NAIP with special reference to livestock based IFS were "green fodder production", "milk production", "use of agricultural implements", "feeding pattern of animals", "artificial insemination" and "use of processing equipments" as per the perception of tribal beneficiaries. These were ranked from 1 to 6 in sequential order in the hierarchy of 14 aspects of strengths. On the other hand, the aspects viz., saving, use of biogas plants, fish production, use of mangers, water management and composting / vermin-composting were perceived by the farmers as comparatively less strong for deriving benefits out of NAIP.

Keywords

NAIP, Beneficiaries, Livestock Based IFS, Strengths, Interventions.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Awasthi, H.K., Singh, P.R., Khan, M.A. and Sharma, P.N. (2002). Knowledge and attitude of dairy farmers towards improved dairy practices. Indian J. Extn. Edu., 38 : 104-105.

  • Paul, N. (2004). Problems and prospects of poultry enterprise in Kathua district of Jammu and Kashmir. Ph.D. Thesis, Maharana Pratap University of Agricultural and Technology, Udaipur, RAJASTHAN (INDIA).

  • Rathore, R.S. and Kalla, P.N. (2002). Attitude of beneficiaries towards National Watershed Development Programme (NWDP) in tribal areas of southern Rajasthan. Rajasthan J. Extn. Edu., 11 : 99-101.

  • Sawant, A.G., Bhairamkar, M.S. and Sagvekar, V.V. (2000). Impact of trining and visit system on farmers. Maharashtra J. Extn. Edu., 21: 118-123.

  • Sagar, M.P. and Singh, R. (1999). Impact of integrated tribal development project on Tharu. Indian J. Extn. Edu., 35: 220 225.

  • Upadhyaya, R. (2000). Comparative study of knowledge, attitude and impact of DWCRA programme on tribal and non-tribal beneficiaries of Udaipur district (Rajasthan). Ph.D. Thesis, Maharana Pratap University of Agricultural and Technology, Udaipur, RAJASTHAN (INDIA).


Abstract Views: 278

PDF Views: 0




  • Effectiveness of NAIP in Strengths of NAIP with Special Reference to Livestock Based IFS Interventions among the Tribal Beneficiaries

Abstract Views: 278  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

R. K. Damor
Department of Extension Education, RCA Campus, Surajpal, Udaipur (Rajasthan), India
K. L. Dangi
Department of Extension Education, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur (Rajasthan), India
H. K. Jain
Department of Agriculture Statistics and Computer Application, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur (Rajasthan), India
R. L. Khatik
Department of Extension Education, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur (Rajasthan), India

Abstract


Six year ambitious agricultural research Programme was launched in India on 6th July, 2006, which is known as National Agricultural Innovation Project (NAIP), the project focused on innovations in agricultural technology. Four districts of Rajasthan viz., Udaipur, Banswara, Dungarpur and Sirohi figure prominently as the disadvantaged districts identified by the planning commission, based on income, tribal population, their resources, state of agriculture, etc. Keeping in view the challenges of food and nutritional security, National Agricultural Innovation consortia project was initiated by the ICAR in MPUAT, Udaipur. The NAIP was implemented in four districts of southern Rajasthan state viz., Banswara, Dungarpur, Sirohi and Udaipur. Two clusters of Dungarpur district were selected for the present study. These were (a) Faloj and (b) Bichhiwara. Total 10 villages out of 15 villages (under NAIP) were selected proportionately on random basis for inclusion in the study. Total size of sample was of 104 respondents. It was found the strengths that 95 (91.35 %) of the farmers were of their face values expressing strengths of NAIP with moderate extent. Negligible respondents 5 (4.81 %) and 4 (3.84 %) could be observed falling under high and low strengths of NAIP, respectively. Furthermore, data clearly show strong aspects of NAIP with special reference to livestock based IFS were "green fodder production", "milk production", "use of agricultural implements", "feeding pattern of animals", "artificial insemination" and "use of processing equipments" as per the perception of tribal beneficiaries. These were ranked from 1 to 6 in sequential order in the hierarchy of 14 aspects of strengths. On the other hand, the aspects viz., saving, use of biogas plants, fish production, use of mangers, water management and composting / vermin-composting were perceived by the farmers as comparatively less strong for deriving benefits out of NAIP.

Keywords


NAIP, Beneficiaries, Livestock Based IFS, Strengths, Interventions.

References