Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Resource Productivity and Resource Use Efficiency in Soybean Production


Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture (V.N.M.K.V), Parbhani (M.S.), India
2 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture (V.N.KM.K.V.), Parbhani (M.S.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Investigation was carried out during the year 2014-15. About 48 non-residential farms were randomly selected from sixteen villages of two tehsils in Parbhani district of Maharashtra. Data were related to soybean output and input like area under crop, hired human labour, bullock labour, machine labour, seed, nitrogen, phophorus, potash, plant p rotection and family human labour. The result revealed that, partial regression co-efficient of area under crop was 0.385 followed by that hired human labour was (0.110) and family human labour (0.165) which were positive and singficant at 1 per cent and 5 per cent level, respectively. Patrial regression co-efficient of bullock labour, manchine labour, phosphorus and potash were positive but non-significant. Marginal product of area under soybean was 5.399 quintals followed by that of bullock labour (0.370q), machine labour (0.220 q) and family human labour (0.142 q). MVP to price ratio with respect to family human labour was 2.16 followed by bullock labour (1.70) and machine labour (1.34). Optimum use of area under soybean was found to be 1.94 hectares and optimum use of phosphorus was 60.24 kg.

Keywords

Soybean, Resources Productivity, Resource Use Efficiency, Optimum Resources.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Asmatoddin, M J.,Ghulghule, N., Jawale, S.V. and Tawale, J.B. (2009). Resource productivity and resource use efficiency in pulses production on medium farm in Marathwada. Internat. J. Agric. Sci., 5(2): 359-362.
  • Bansode, P.S. (2008). Economic analysis of marginal farm in Marathwada region of Maharashtra. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Marathwada Agricultural University, Parbhani, 93p.
  • Bhagwat, M.Z. (2008). Economic analysis of small farm in Marathwada region of Maharashtra. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Marathwada Agricultural University, Parbhani, 102p.
  • Jadhav, M.S. (2008). Economic analysis of medium farm in Marathwada region of Maharashtra state. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Marathwada Agricultural University, Parbhani, 108p.
  • Kumar, S. and Kumar, S. (2004). Resource productivity and retuns from selected foodgrain crops of Himachal Pradesh. Agric. Situ India, 61(7) : 475-485.
  • Saini, G.R. (1969). Resource use efficiency in agriculture. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 24 (2): 1-18
  • Tawale, J.B. (2007). Economics of production and marketing of rainfed and irrigated Rabi jowar in Osmanabad district. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Marathwada Agricultural University, Parbhani, 66p.
  • Tawale, J.B. (2010). Economics of production and marketing of soybean in Latur disrict of Maharashtra. Ph.D. (Ag.) Thesis, Marathwada Agricultural University, Parbhani, 230p.

Abstract Views: 245

PDF Views: 0




  • Resource Productivity and Resource Use Efficiency in Soybean Production

Abstract Views: 245  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

D. B. Pawar
Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture (V.N.M.K.V), Parbhani (M.S.), India
K. V. Deshmukh
Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture (V.N.KM.K.V.), Parbhani (M.S.), India
P. U. Kauthekar
Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture (V.N.KM.K.V.), Parbhani (M.S.), India

Abstract


Investigation was carried out during the year 2014-15. About 48 non-residential farms were randomly selected from sixteen villages of two tehsils in Parbhani district of Maharashtra. Data were related to soybean output and input like area under crop, hired human labour, bullock labour, machine labour, seed, nitrogen, phophorus, potash, plant p rotection and family human labour. The result revealed that, partial regression co-efficient of area under crop was 0.385 followed by that hired human labour was (0.110) and family human labour (0.165) which were positive and singficant at 1 per cent and 5 per cent level, respectively. Patrial regression co-efficient of bullock labour, manchine labour, phosphorus and potash were positive but non-significant. Marginal product of area under soybean was 5.399 quintals followed by that of bullock labour (0.370q), machine labour (0.220 q) and family human labour (0.142 q). MVP to price ratio with respect to family human labour was 2.16 followed by bullock labour (1.70) and machine labour (1.34). Optimum use of area under soybean was found to be 1.94 hectares and optimum use of phosphorus was 60.24 kg.

Keywords


Soybean, Resources Productivity, Resource Use Efficiency, Optimum Resources.

References