Agriculture Update

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Independent Household and Farm Factors in Adoption of Different Agroforestry Types:Experience from Haridwar District, North India


Affiliations
1 Extension Division, Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (Uttarakhand), India
2 Forest Extension Division, Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (Uttarakhand), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This study accesses the individual, house hold and farm factors that are not associated with adoption of four major kinds of agroforestry practices in Haridwar district, India. Random sampling technique was used for the purpose. All three tehsils were selected and 12 villages were randomly selected from each of the tehsils. 12 farmers' households were randomly selected from each of the village. Primary data were collected through semi structured questionnaire with 426 farmers out of which 365 farmers were agroforestry adaptors. Data from agroforestry adopters only is analyzed in this study. The results of the study shows that there were a number of determinants which although being a part of household conditions, did not influence an agroforestry adopter's decision on what types of agroforestry he should practice his field. Chi2 test (p=0.05) shoes that there is no significant association between different household conditions determinants and a farmers choice on types of agroforestry practices in all three tehsils of the studied district. The adopted agroforestry practices in the study area include agri-silvi and pastoral based practices, horticulture tree species based like orchard plantation or home gardens; multipurpose tree species woodlots and live fences in form of planting trees on farm boundaries.

Keywords

Adoption, Agroforestry, Chi2-Test, Factors, Practices.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Adedayo, A.G. and Sobola, O. (2014). Farmers perception and adoption of agroforestry practices in Osun state, Nigeria. Forest Res., 3 : 127. Doi 10.4172/2168-9776.1000127, accessed on 24. 12. 2016.

  • Dhyani, S.K., Karemulla, K., Ajit and Handa, A.K. (2009). Agroforestry potential and scope for dry land across agro climatic zones in India. Indian J. Agroforestry, 32 (2): 181-192.

  • Dwivedi, R.P., K aremulla, K., Singh, R., Rizvi, R.H. and Singh, J. (2007). Socio-economic analysis of agroforestry systems in Western Utter Pradesh. Indian Res. J. Extn. Edu., 7 (2& 3): 18-12

  • Kabwe, G.,Bigsby, H. and Cullen, R. (2009).Factors influencing adoption of agroforestry among smallholder farmers in Zambia. Paper presented at the NZARES conference aug. 27-28, Nelson, New Zealand. pp. 1-22.

  • Kant, S. and Lehrer, E.D. (2004). Institutional analysis framework. In : Valuing agroforestry systems: methods and applications (JRR Alavalapati and DE Mercer) Kluwer academic publishers, Dordecht, U.S.A. pp 280-302

  • Madiwalar, S.L., Channabasappa, K.S. and Deshmukh, R.C. (2007). Survey and documentation of agroforestry models in Bidar, Gulbarga and Raichur districts. Karnataka J. agric. Sci., 20 (1): 93-95.

  • Mugure, A., Oino, P.G. and Sorre, B. (2012). Land ownership and its impact on adoption of agroforestry practices among rural households in Kenya: a case of Busia county. Internat. J. Innovation & Applied Studies, 4 (3) : 552-559.

  • Nair, P.K.R. (1993). An introduction to agroforestry. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.

  • Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th Ed.). New York: the free press.

  • Sabastian, G.,Kanowski, P., Race, D., Williams, E. and Roshetko, J. M. (2014). Household and farm attributes affecting adoption of small holder timber management practices by tree growers in Gunungkidul region, Indonesia. Agroforestry Systems, 88 (2): 257-268.

  • Sinclair, F.L. (1999). A general classification of agroforestry practices. Agroforestry Systems, 46: 161-180.

  • Singh, D.K., Singh, A.K., Yadav, V.P., Singh, R.B., Baghel, R.S. and Singh, M. (2009). Association of socio-economic status with economic motivation of the farmers. Indian Res. J. Extn. Edu., 9 (2) : 53-56.

  • Tewari, S., Kaushal, R. and Purohit, R. (2007). Agroforestry in Uttarakhand. In Agroforestry: system and practice (S.Puri and P. Panwar, Eds.) New India publishing agency, India. 66-94.

  • Baliyan, K. (2014). Factors affecting participation of women in household decision making: implication for family welfare and agriculture development. Socio-economic Voices, 1-14. Retrieved from http://www.indiastat.com/SOCIO_PDF/103/fulltext.pdf on 12.10.2016

  • F.S.I. (2011). Indian state of forest report. Forest survey of India, Dehradun, India. pp. 236-240. http://fsi.nic.in/cover_2011/uttarakhand.pdf accessed on 25.12.2016

  • http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/97 13 5/2/ 2009_9_Zambian%20Agroforestry%20Adoption_KabweG.pdf

  • Oino, P. and Mugure, A. (2013). Farmer-oriented factors that influence adoption of agroforestry practies in Kenya. Experience from Nambale district, Busia county. Internat. J. Sci. & Res., 2 (4): 450-456. http://www.ijsr.net/archive/v2i4/IJSRON2013677.pdf retrieved on 12.10.2016

  • Uttarakhand population census data (2011). www.census.co.in/census/state/uttarakhand

  • District census (2011). www.census.co.in. retrieved 14.04.2015

  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uttarakhand

  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haridwar_district


Abstract Views: 240

PDF Views: 0




  • Independent Household and Farm Factors in Adoption of Different Agroforestry Types:Experience from Haridwar District, North India

Abstract Views: 240  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Himshikha
Extension Division, Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (Uttarakhand), India
Charan Singh
Forest Extension Division, Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (Uttarakhand), India

Abstract


This study accesses the individual, house hold and farm factors that are not associated with adoption of four major kinds of agroforestry practices in Haridwar district, India. Random sampling technique was used for the purpose. All three tehsils were selected and 12 villages were randomly selected from each of the tehsils. 12 farmers' households were randomly selected from each of the village. Primary data were collected through semi structured questionnaire with 426 farmers out of which 365 farmers were agroforestry adaptors. Data from agroforestry adopters only is analyzed in this study. The results of the study shows that there were a number of determinants which although being a part of household conditions, did not influence an agroforestry adopter's decision on what types of agroforestry he should practice his field. Chi2 test (p=0.05) shoes that there is no significant association between different household conditions determinants and a farmers choice on types of agroforestry practices in all three tehsils of the studied district. The adopted agroforestry practices in the study area include agri-silvi and pastoral based practices, horticulture tree species based like orchard plantation or home gardens; multipurpose tree species woodlots and live fences in form of planting trees on farm boundaries.

Keywords


Adoption, Agroforestry, Chi2-Test, Factors, Practices.

References