Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Constraints in Adoption of Integrated Pest Management Practices by Cotton Growers in Nimar Region of Madhya Pradesh


Affiliations
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (R.V.S.K.V.V.), Dewas (M.P.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is a pest management system that in the context of the associated environment and the population dynamics of the pest species, utilizes all suitable techniques and methods in as compatible manner as possible and maintain the pest population at level below these causing economic injury. This approach has been globally accepted for achieving sustainability in agriculture and maintaining the agro-eco-system. Cotton being a major commercial crop of the Nimar region in Madhya Pradesh and keeping in view the importance of IPM to manage the insects and pests of cotton crop, the present study was carried out to assess the present status of adoption of IPM practices by cotton growers in Barwani district of Nimar region. The multistage sampling technique was employed to select 140 respondents from seven blocks of the district for present study. The perusal of data indicated that the majority of respondents adopted recommended chemical control measure (95.33%). The great majority of the farmers are using chemicals to protect their cotton crop along with other cultural practices like grazing by sheep and goat in cotton field after last picking (79.16%), use of certified seed (85.66%) and use of recommended dose of fertilizers (66.33%). The findings also indicated that the majority of cotton growers faced problems that inadequacy of labours and high wage rate for undertaking the manual work like handpicking (87.85%), adoption of biological control measures and mechanical control (82.14%). The lack of knowledge about yellow sticky traps for control of white fly (74.28%), lack of knowledge about use of pheromone trap (82.14%), lack of knowledge about intercropping of cotton with cowpea/maize/lady finger as trap crop (73.57%), lack of knowledge about use of bio-agent (58.57%) and lack of knowledge about procedure of preparing extract of neem seed kernel (52.14%) were the major constraints in adoption of IPM programme.

Keywords

Integrated Pest Management, Sustainability, Intercropping, Constraints.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Chander, Subhash and Singh, S.P. (2003). Constraints in adoption of integrated pest management practices in cotton. Indian J. Extn. Edu., 39 (182) : 41-49.
  • Katole, R.T., Nikhade, D.M., Ingle, P.O. and Wankhade, P.P. (1997). Extent of adoption of plant protection measures in hybrid cotton AHH-468. J.Soils & Crops, 7(2) : 160-162.
  • Krishnamurthy, B. and Veerabhadraiah, V. (1999). Impact of farmer field school on integrated pest management in rice farmers in Karnataka, India. Tropical Agric. Res., 11 :174-189.
  • Nema, K.K. and Verma, S.N. (2000). Integrated management of gram pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera Hub.) in chickpea. In souvenir annual workshop of AICRP on chickpea and MULLARP (Agrawal, S.C., Prasad, K.V.V. and Yadav, H.S. ed.) Held at CIAE Bhopal, Sept., 10-13, 2000.
  • Sharma, V.B., Sharma, T.N. and Singh, R.L. (1997). Adoption behaviour of cotton growers with special reference to knowledge status and constraints. Crop Res., Hissar, 13(1): 199-203.
  • Shinde, P.S., Bhople, R.S. and Vaidya, V.R. (1997). Adoption of integrated pest management practices by cotton growers. Maha. J. Extn. Edu., 16 : 167-173.

Abstract Views: 299

PDF Views: 0




  • Constraints in Adoption of Integrated Pest Management Practices by Cotton Growers in Nimar Region of Madhya Pradesh

Abstract Views: 299  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Neerja Patel
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (R.V.S.K.V.V.), Dewas (M.P.), India
Manish Kumar
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (R.V.S.K.V.V.), Dewas (M.P.), India
Nishith Gupta
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (R.V.S.K.V.V.), Dewas (M.P.), India
Ankita Pandey
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (R.V.S.K.V.V.), Dewas (M.P.), India

Abstract


Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is a pest management system that in the context of the associated environment and the population dynamics of the pest species, utilizes all suitable techniques and methods in as compatible manner as possible and maintain the pest population at level below these causing economic injury. This approach has been globally accepted for achieving sustainability in agriculture and maintaining the agro-eco-system. Cotton being a major commercial crop of the Nimar region in Madhya Pradesh and keeping in view the importance of IPM to manage the insects and pests of cotton crop, the present study was carried out to assess the present status of adoption of IPM practices by cotton growers in Barwani district of Nimar region. The multistage sampling technique was employed to select 140 respondents from seven blocks of the district for present study. The perusal of data indicated that the majority of respondents adopted recommended chemical control measure (95.33%). The great majority of the farmers are using chemicals to protect their cotton crop along with other cultural practices like grazing by sheep and goat in cotton field after last picking (79.16%), use of certified seed (85.66%) and use of recommended dose of fertilizers (66.33%). The findings also indicated that the majority of cotton growers faced problems that inadequacy of labours and high wage rate for undertaking the manual work like handpicking (87.85%), adoption of biological control measures and mechanical control (82.14%). The lack of knowledge about yellow sticky traps for control of white fly (74.28%), lack of knowledge about use of pheromone trap (82.14%), lack of knowledge about intercropping of cotton with cowpea/maize/lady finger as trap crop (73.57%), lack of knowledge about use of bio-agent (58.57%) and lack of knowledge about procedure of preparing extract of neem seed kernel (52.14%) were the major constraints in adoption of IPM programme.

Keywords


Integrated Pest Management, Sustainability, Intercropping, Constraints.

References