Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Marketing Cost, Market Margin and Price Spread in Fig


Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Latur (M.S.), India
2 Department of Agricultural Extension Education, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad (Karnataka), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Three marketing channels were noticed in sale of fig viz., Channel-I: Producer-Consumer, Channel-II Producer-Commiss ion agent-Retailer-Consumer and Channel-II I Producer-Commiss ion agent-Wholesaler-Retailer-Consumer. Quantity sold through Channel-III was higher. Per quintal marketing cost incurred by producer was worked out to be Rs. 617.53 which was high because of heavy charges by commission agent followed by transport and packing material. From the various items of the marketing cost, major contributing factors were commission charges which was highest (40.75 per cent) followed by packing material (22.93 per cent), transport charges (17.54 per cent) and grading and packing charges (10.67 per cent). Marketing cost incurred by wholesaler in Mumbai market, retailer in Mumbai market and retailer in Pune market was Rs. 79.30/quintal, Rs. 588.24/quintal and Rs. 463.01/quintal, respectively. The total marketing cost incurred by retailer was more because of high transport charges and more losses during transport. Price spread of fig in Pune and Mumbai markets have been studied. In the process of marketing of fig in Pune and Mumbai markets, producers were getting only 64.29 per cent and 51.80 per cent of the consumer’s rupee, respectively. The rest of the rupee was swallowed by the market expenses incurred by producer, expenses and margins of retailer in Pune market and Mumbai markets.

Keywords

Fig, Marketing, Market Margin, Consumer’s Rupee, Price Spread.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


Abstract Views: 297

PDF Views: 0




  • Marketing Cost, Market Margin and Price Spread in Fig

Abstract Views: 297  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

M. Y. Bhosale
Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Latur (M.S.), India
R. D. Shelke
Department of Agricultural Extension Education, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad (Karnataka), India
V. K. Aher
Department of Agricultural Extension Education, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad (Karnataka), India
B. A. Shenewad
Department of Agricultural Extension Education, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad (Karnataka), India

Abstract


Three marketing channels were noticed in sale of fig viz., Channel-I: Producer-Consumer, Channel-II Producer-Commiss ion agent-Retailer-Consumer and Channel-II I Producer-Commiss ion agent-Wholesaler-Retailer-Consumer. Quantity sold through Channel-III was higher. Per quintal marketing cost incurred by producer was worked out to be Rs. 617.53 which was high because of heavy charges by commission agent followed by transport and packing material. From the various items of the marketing cost, major contributing factors were commission charges which was highest (40.75 per cent) followed by packing material (22.93 per cent), transport charges (17.54 per cent) and grading and packing charges (10.67 per cent). Marketing cost incurred by wholesaler in Mumbai market, retailer in Mumbai market and retailer in Pune market was Rs. 79.30/quintal, Rs. 588.24/quintal and Rs. 463.01/quintal, respectively. The total marketing cost incurred by retailer was more because of high transport charges and more losses during transport. Price spread of fig in Pune and Mumbai markets have been studied. In the process of marketing of fig in Pune and Mumbai markets, producers were getting only 64.29 per cent and 51.80 per cent of the consumer’s rupee, respectively. The rest of the rupee was swallowed by the market expenses incurred by producer, expenses and margins of retailer in Pune market and Mumbai markets.

Keywords


Fig, Marketing, Market Margin, Consumer’s Rupee, Price Spread.