Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Constraints Encountered by the NAIP Beneficiaries in Adoption of Recommended Wheat Interventions


Affiliations
1 Department of Extension Education, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur (Rajasthan), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


National Agricultural Innovation Project (NAIP) focuses on four components which aimed at ICAR as the catalyzing agent for the management of change in the Indian National Agricultural Research System; Research on Sustainable Rural Livelihood Security; and Basic and Strategic Research in Frontier Areas of Agricultural Sciences, multiple technology options in holistic and integrated manner in order to increase their productivity and profitability. In Rajasthan, consortia NAIP were in operation in four tribal populated districts namely, Udaipur, Banswara, Dungarpur and Sirohi. Total size of sample was of 152 respondents, combining beneficiaries and non – beneficiaries. Conclusion can be drawn that “shattering with over maturity” and “susceptible to diseases” were the most severe constraints expressed by farmers which were assigned first and second rank with 86.12 and 85.01 MPS, respectively. “Lack of knowledge about use of Azotobacter/Rhizobium culture” and “lack of knowledge about right proportion of seed rate for mixed cropping” were the most severe constraints expressed by farmers of area which were assigned first and second rank with MPS 88.31 and 85.80, respectively withX, XI and XII ranks with 64.00, 61.40 and 60.72 MPS, respectively. “Lack of FYM/vermin-compost and other organic sources”, “acidic/saline/alkaline soil”, “lack of knowledge about use of quantity of NPK fertilizers”, “lack of knowledge about combination of organic and inorganic source”, “expenditure on fertilizers are more risky” and “high cost” were expressed as the most severe constraints expressed by the respondents which were placed at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 ranks with 82.33, 81.05, 80.10, 79.50, 77.62 and 75.00 MPS, respectively, in the rank hierarchy of technical constraints.

Keywords

NAIP, HYVs, Beneficiary, Non Beneficiary.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Brar, K.S. (2001). Problems and prospects of cotton cultivation in Sriganganagar district of Rajasthan. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur (Rajasthan) India.
  • Choudhary, P.C. and Sharma, N.K. (2008). Constraints in adoption of onion interventions introduced under IVLP in Ajmer region. Rajasthan J. Extn. Edu., 16 : 63-68.
  • Sharma, R. and Sharma, S.K. (2001). Constraints of KVK in making expected impact on the farmers. Indian J. Soc. Res., 13: 85-88.

Abstract Views: 316

PDF Views: 0




  • Constraints Encountered by the NAIP Beneficiaries in Adoption of Recommended Wheat Interventions

Abstract Views: 316  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Santosh Devi Samota
Department of Extension Education, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur (Rajasthan), India
K. L. Dangi
Department of Extension Education, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur (Rajasthan), India

Abstract


National Agricultural Innovation Project (NAIP) focuses on four components which aimed at ICAR as the catalyzing agent for the management of change in the Indian National Agricultural Research System; Research on Sustainable Rural Livelihood Security; and Basic and Strategic Research in Frontier Areas of Agricultural Sciences, multiple technology options in holistic and integrated manner in order to increase their productivity and profitability. In Rajasthan, consortia NAIP were in operation in four tribal populated districts namely, Udaipur, Banswara, Dungarpur and Sirohi. Total size of sample was of 152 respondents, combining beneficiaries and non – beneficiaries. Conclusion can be drawn that “shattering with over maturity” and “susceptible to diseases” were the most severe constraints expressed by farmers which were assigned first and second rank with 86.12 and 85.01 MPS, respectively. “Lack of knowledge about use of Azotobacter/Rhizobium culture” and “lack of knowledge about right proportion of seed rate for mixed cropping” were the most severe constraints expressed by farmers of area which were assigned first and second rank with MPS 88.31 and 85.80, respectively withX, XI and XII ranks with 64.00, 61.40 and 60.72 MPS, respectively. “Lack of FYM/vermin-compost and other organic sources”, “acidic/saline/alkaline soil”, “lack of knowledge about use of quantity of NPK fertilizers”, “lack of knowledge about combination of organic and inorganic source”, “expenditure on fertilizers are more risky” and “high cost” were expressed as the most severe constraints expressed by the respondents which were placed at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 ranks with 82.33, 81.05, 80.10, 79.50, 77.62 and 75.00 MPS, respectively, in the rank hierarchy of technical constraints.

Keywords


NAIP, HYVs, Beneficiary, Non Beneficiary.

References